Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2009, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Earth Wanderer, longing for the stars.
12,406 posts, read 18,978,568 times
Reputation: 8912

Advertisements

It is amazing to me that the very folks who want a free market capitalistic solution to our problems are also those who are for tort reform.

The biggest proponents of the free market, Libertarians, think that even environmental problems should be solved by people pressing law suits upon offending companies, and most certainly that some of our medical problems should be addressed in such a manner.

It used to be common knowledge that unnecessary medical testing was due to hospitals telling their associated doctors to order such tests to help pay for the expensive equipment.

Later, it became more 'convenient' to use tort as an excuse for all those tests, but I don't think that's the whole truth because this preponderance of testing started way before tort reform became an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2009, 01:45 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,328,875 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldengrain View Post
It is amazing to me that the very folks who want a free market capitalistic solution to our problems are also those who are for tort reform.

The biggest proponents of the free market, Libertarians, think that even environmental problems should be solved by people pressing law suits upon offending companies, and most certainly that some of our medical problems should be addressed in such a manner.

It used to be common knowledge that unnecessary medical testing was due to hospitals telling their associated doctors to order such tests to help pay for the expensive equipment.

Later, it became more 'convenient' to use tort as an excuse for all those tests, but I don't think that's the whole truth because this preponderance of testing started way before tort reform became an issue.
I'll take a jury over a lobbyist-congress any day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:10 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
745 posts, read 1,438,726 times
Reputation: 426
What does Lawyers lining their pockets have to do with improving health care?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:15 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
745 posts, read 1,438,726 times
Reputation: 426
Hey goldengrain- This OpEd in today's WSJ might answer your question.
Kim Strassel: The President’s Tort Two-Step - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,069,811 times
Reputation: 954
Tort reform is such a red herring. Malpractice is 1/2 % of overall medical costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:32 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
745 posts, read 1,438,726 times
Reputation: 426
Would I be incorrect to guess that you guys are lawyers? Or perhaps lobbyists for Lawyers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,450,481 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
Tort reform is such a red herring. Malpractice is 1/2 % of overall medical costs.
But I wouldn't mind if something were thrown into the health care reform legislation if it meant the bill would make it out of the Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,069,811 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
But I wouldn't mind if something were thrown into the health care reform legislation if it meant the bill would make it out of the Congress.
Give me the list of Republican who will vote for a public option if tort reform is included.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 02:58 PM
 
6,822 posts, read 14,041,292 times
Reputation: 5760
Well the trial lawyers have the Democrats in there pocket while the big insurance companies have the Republicans. Neither is good for the American public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 03:01 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,929,235 times
Reputation: 13807
I work in public accounting and our firm spends $300 million on "practice protection" every year as well as having a huge General Counsel department. As far as I am concerned this is wasted and non-productive money and all part of the "lawyers full employment act".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top