Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2009, 04:31 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,129,736 times
Reputation: 11095

Advertisements

With the White House zeroing in on the insurance-industry practice of discriminating against clients based on pre-existing conditions, administration allies are calling attention to how broadly insurers interpret the term to maximize profits.

When Getting Beaten By Your Husband Is A Pre-Existing Condition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2009, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
With insurance practices like that, we may as well have the Taliban distributing healthcare benefits!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 04:37 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,231,338 times
Reputation: 2857
And then there are the married couples who have to divorce in order to protect the well spouse from being wiped out financially from medical bills.

This is the status quo the Right is protecting and the Tea Partiers are insisting we keep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Don't forget the married couples who can't divorce because a spouse will lose medical benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 04:42 PM
 
683 posts, read 825,074 times
Reputation: 408
This is the reason we should be debating health INSURANCE reform not government run healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Sniper View Post
This is the reason we should be debating health INSURANCE reform not government run healthcare.
How do you reform a company that puts profit before people!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,701,378 times
Reputation: 9980
So is Pregnancy........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 06:51 PM
 
Location: ✶✶✶✶
15,216 posts, read 30,563,119 times
Reputation: 10851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Sniper View Post
This is the reason we should be debating health INSURANCE reform not government run healthcare.
And the only way to reform insurance is through the government. Sucks, but that's the way it is. The insurers have no impetus to change anything on their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC
299 posts, read 635,368 times
Reputation: 313
I think one of the saddest circumstances I've ever seen was a couple who had been married several years, finally had the child they'd been hoping for and who was born with several medical problems. The husband was a Nevada State Trooper and after fighting with the insurance companies for a couple of years trying to get things paid for that they truly needed, the state government turned down a provision that would have allowed the necessary items to be covered, for a state trooper no less, someone who puts his life on the line daily.

They applied for Medicaid because the State Troopers insurance company changed, actually they were dropped because of this individual's high expenses. They were not covered because they were married. They were actually told they should divorce because then both mother and child could be covered by Medicaid. This advice was quoted to them by several government officials!! Instead of trying to solve the problem by instituting mandatory insurance guidelines, they told this great couple to get a divorce. Yet they could still live together and raise their child, and he would be insured. Now what about all those people who say we have the best coverage in the world??? What would you tell this couple? And for all those insurance executives making multimillion dollar bonuses, how the hell do you sleep at night? Is insurance only for the healthy and wealthy??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2009, 07:45 PM
LML
 
Location: Wisconsin
7,100 posts, read 9,112,238 times
Reputation: 5191
I have a friend who lost his insurance when his wife had a nervous breakdown. Couldn't get any after that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top