Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2009, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hombre57 View Post
Oh please, you can't be serious????!!

Do you actually believe Glen Beck?

That's not news, that's entertainment! and laughable when he cries like a baby in public in front of a camera!

Some channels are still showing billy mays commercials, who is deceased. I'd rather watch him instead of beck.

You fox watchers are funny. You're going to keep us libs giggling for the next 3.5 years! Is that what is called right wing media? because if it is, the repubs are definitely in trouble for 2012.
Since you are so sure that Beck is never right about the things he reports about the far left and who is what in that group maybe you would try to defend some of them to me when I point out some of what good old Glenn says about them. Now to do that you are going to have to watch some of him, either daily, or on GlenBeckClips.com and I don't think you want to do any of that. You don't and never have watched him but you are wililng to take the words of far left talkers about what he says. You shouldn't be talking about whether he talks truth or not when you don't know from personal knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2009, 10:57 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,215,542 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Would you say that all the controversy about Van Jones and not ACORN and SEIU aren't news? Well of course you would because they don't work in the interests of Our Glorious Leader, who you have been so supportive of all this time. As long as all that is reported is the kind of crap that Robert Gibbs puts out when he says what he thinks the president thinks is news, you will be happy.
You have no idea what will make me happy. As for Van Jones, ACORN and SEIU, roy, those topics have indeed been reported by other media outlets than FOX. Your "Glorious Leader" Glenn Beck is not the only entertainer on TV.

I did indeed support Obama for President. I have not been happy with everything he has done since the election, although I still do support his Presidency, and I never, ever think of him as "Our Glorious Leader," roy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nativechief View Post
You know why Glenn beck doesnt come on during the real news programs? Its because what he has to say isnt the real news. He is just another media comedian like Rush LIMpballs with no proven credibility,, Little more than a circus clown wearing a big red nose and giant floppy shoes.thats all. LOL
Actually I would like to challenge you to prove that set of statements with something other than all that knowledge you have picked up from others of your group of believers. I would do so but I don't think you would be willing to take apart what he says from not knowing about it from direct contact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 11:02 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,215,542 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I used to watch Russert although I thought he leaned left. Even Stephanopoulus wasn't bad but when I realized that the head man at ABC, Charlie Gibson, admit that he just heard about ACORN early last week I decided that they weren't much for news. Of course, any group that would attempt what Rather did isn't very good and Couric is nothing more than an old used to be pretty fact with no depth to her as a reporter, at all.

I guess that leaves me out of the news business on Sunday. I have watched Wallace for over 4 years because I always got him at 10:00 am instead of the Fox News time of 1:00.

Oh well, better to be uninformed by watching ABC, where you are concerned.
"Couric is nothing more than an old used to be pretty fact".......OMG! That is just out and out sexist, roy!! I don't care for Couric's eveing news, but it isn't because she is an, as you say, "old used to be pretty fact".....dear god!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin13 View Post
"He is great giving a speech with is [sic] teleprompters but not so hot at answering questions" = YOUR OPINON.

I disagree with your opinion. I think President Obama is very intelligent, well educated and informed, and is, in fact, very good at "answering questions" off the cuff.
I wonder what would happen if he got a question from Wallace what trades the Russians offered for him to take out the promises to Eastern Europe about the missile shield. I think he couldn't have answered that question very truthfully, but then I don't understand why he did that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 11:08 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,215,542 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I wonder what would happen if he got a question from Wallace what trades the Russians offered for him to take out the promises to Eastern Europe about the missile shield. I think he couldn't have answered that question very truthfully, but then I don't understand why he did that.
Of course he could answer that question easily. roy, WHERE is your proof that Obama the Russians offered the US anything to CHANGE the missile shield program?

You don't "THINK" he could answer that question very truthfull = YOUR OPINION (again). Where are your facts to back it up?

Perhaps if you would do some reading about the whole "missile shield" program you would have a better understanding of WHY the program was changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin13 View Post
"Couric is nothing more than an old used to be pretty fact".......OMG! That is just out and out sexist, roy!! I don't care for Couric's eveing news, but it isn't because she, as you say, "old used to be pretty fact".....dear god!
What else, other than what I stated and the fact that she never reports anything that may not push the Obamas can you find about her? Did she really improve the viewership of that show when she took it over? I guess I missed that part.

And you are very right about the sexism. I have been called sexist by better women than you for years. Why, Austin, once a couple of fellow teachers presented me with a beautiful tie with little piggies all over it and the letters MCP under them. I wore it for more than just one year because I liked it so well and so many people knew about why I had it and loved what it stood for.

Oh, BTW, you asked for a list and I am working on it but not finished yet. It takes some doing to get all those things down in one place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin13 View Post
Of course he could answer that question easily. roy, WHERE is your proof that Obama the Russians offered the US anything to CHANGE the missile shield program?

You don't "THINK" he could answer that question very truthfull = YOUR OPINION (again). Where are your facts to back it up?

Perhaps if you would do some reading about the whole "missile shield" program you would have a better understanding of WHY the program was changed.
Yeup, there that old CHANGE thing is again. I am sure he didn't want to take a chance with that one and I know he didn't want to deal with his old employer, ACORN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
We are closer than we were a year ago. Also, most of those Third World countries are dictatorial or socialistic which we aren't, YET but we are gaining and that is what Obama and his shadow government in the White House are aimed at, and you know it.
The third world country I was in is a democracy (Brazil).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
The third world country I was in is a democracy (Brazil).
Very good. I did say most I think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top