Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
And if one does not exhibit enough of that ability? In Denmark, you lose the freedom to go to college (sorry, "university").
|
People who don't have the ability to get that education don't get it regardless. There is really nothing to be done about that, no matter how much mum and dad spends on it. No matter how many people who had the ability and ambition they squeeze out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
Balanced against the populace's freedom to decide that two dudes sucking face on an altar is not a marriage.
|
There is really
no such thing as the population in generals freedom to decide who consenting adults get to kiss. None. Zilch. Nada. In fact, that is normally referred to as
the opposite to freedom. Namely, other people getting to impose their standards on you, regardless of whether it affects them at all.
This freedom thing -you really have no idea what the word means, do you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
Balanced against the employer's freedom to not lose money and possibly lose their business. How would you feel if you owned a small business and employees were taking a year off and you had to keep them on?
|
Perfectly fine, its not like I haven't run a business under those conditions before, and admired how well it works. It makes for an excellent opportunity for graduates to get their first job, and obviously, there is no competitive disadvantage since all businesses have the same legislative framework.
Seriously, it keeps a lot of talent in the work pool and obviously works better than the idea that you have to compete with the third world in workers conditions. The only way to compete with the third world is to be third world!
Also, long-term it keeps the working, tax-paying people breeding, rather than leaving that to the nonworking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
The vast majority of Americans walk the streets without fear.
|
Not true. Not true at all. The vast majority of Americans don't actually have anything happen to them when walking the streets at night, but the
fear is omnipresent. Driven by media and politicans.
Maybe its not untill you live in a different society, where childern are routinely left outside shops in prams and no-one would even consider that a woman should not walk home alone at night to realize how omnipresent the fear of crime has become in America. Trust me, it is a massive difference in freedom. (look the word up)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
So, we don't have cab drivers and cashiers making a living here?
|
It is a choice between throwing more of your life into work or not having a decent living. A choice other nations often have the fredom not to face.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
The vast majority of American citizens are covered.
|
Many are not. Unlike nations who then by defintion enjoy more freedom.
And more importantly -to be covered, Americans are forced into certain choices and actions when it comes to employment and career...how to spend their lives -that Scandinavians do not have to face, because the possiblity of not being covered do not exist. Having your choices restricted on pain of permanent damage,disability or ruin is being less free.
Can you imagine the level of freedom not having those restrictions bring?
Being free to start a business when you feel that you got the skills for it, without having to drop your and your familys health care, or not even considering COBRA if you contemplate a change of career? To have a baby when your family feels it is right, without worrying about the cost or coverage?
I think you've been so compressed by your lack of freedom that you can't even imagine what it is like not to be constrained like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
Balanced against the employer's freedom from having to lose an employee for extended periods so they can sit on a beach and consequently has to scramble to make up for the deficit.
|
You really do need to look up what "freedom" means! The employer does not have a "freedom" to demand 20 years of constant attendance from his employee. The book definition of that kind of situation is "slavery". The employer does not suffer any competitive disadvantage, because every other employer is working under the same set of rules.
The individual who can do this is by defintion more free than the individual who can't.
I really, honestly feel that you don't have a good grip on the
concept of freedom here. You are arguing that inchoate entities such as "the populace" and "employers" should have the "freedom" to overide the wishes of individuals...thats...
not freedom as the word is undrestood by anyone.
It is the opposite!