Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-26-2009, 05:57 AM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,234,421 times
Reputation: 586

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Really? Even when a big old fat southern white man calls some young punk a boy. How about then?



More PC BS and hogwash. Next thing you know, the word "black" will be deemed racist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
The poster used the term "boy", as in inexperienced, which is patently truue.
CAUTION; defending a fellow poster's racial slurs can cost you, but some RIGHTIES will defend other RIGHTIES at any cost, even if they're wrong. Now that's hogwash. Both of you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Quote:
tolerate this boy in President's clothing
In context, it does not appear as if the poster is referring to "inexperience" as you suggest or believe, I will not say think, because you can't.

Attention ladies and gentlemen of the forum! We're now changing the English language: BOY now means inexperience. BLACK really means WHITE.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOKK8mAkiUI
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2009, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Northwest
2,027 posts, read 4,546,236 times
Reputation: 2590
Default What I would do... :thinking:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RareWonder View Post

:: thinking ... RFSilver, let me ask you a question...

if you had complete power to give a direction to the
Republican Party, understanding that our old way of
thinking has proven ineffective and alienating,
about our future goals what would you do?

I want you to use your wildest imagination taking the
skills that you have used in playing strategy games.

I also want you to be as free as possible with your answer
and disregard any thought that would limit your reply.

Who knows, maybe the answer does lie in the youth,
so I want to pick your brain in a very broad way.
And please don't worry thinking you must know all the answers.

Don't be afraid of sounding naive either for I find you a
thoughtful young man.

Just pretend this is a family gathering and imagine an older
relative has asked you your views and is very interested
in your repsonse.


rare

: thinks about it: ok... I'm just gonna say stuff off the top of my head
with little thinking. The first thing I would do is put all effort to
change the image of the party ...

so PR... we got a pr problem nationally AND abroad. I would deal with
the nitty gritty of it without excuse. My goal would be to change
the perception abroad since that is where the new strategy must
be effective.

The new strategy is how to negotiate... the art of negotiation, the
art of influence, the art of cooperation. ok.. now what would I do...

First of all I would cut out all this anti-Obama stuff because first
of all, its ineffective, with marches that have Obama dressed in
african garb with maxist, socialism etc written on cards...

That hurts my international image as a viable, intellectual party.
It insults potential countries I want to do business with and
influence ... and it make me look like a party of dumb bunnies.

What I would do is start co-opting victories Obama make, as
a Republican idea. And have a lot of writers NOT go in lock-step
but cast a broad net of possible steps the Administration can do,
and when he does, Claim it as a victory for AMERICA and
make sure that a Republican/Conservative name stay in front
of the event.

See I know I would want to inherit a certain foundation from
the present adminstration and so would not get people used to
disrespecting the office that I want my party to have.

Also if I could co-opt the victories as Republican ones... then the
extreme left would have to stop their learning right now, how to
work these new strategies and start attacking Obama because we're
not wasting our time like that any more.

See, right now they're learning these arts while we're wasting our time.
So I would be saying good job Obama, do you know our writer
RTY outlined that very same move 2 months ago in her/his article
UIO. See what I mean? We have co-opted the victory as our
own strategy.

Like this UN speech of Obama... if we had had a writer with that view
then we could have said, Obama has taken the direction of our
conservative writer GhI and as GhI outlined, used that direction
to bring China and Russia closer in line to what is good for America...

So you see what i mean? instead of going against that speech, and not
then being able to capitalized on the victory of nations outside of our
alliances moving closer to us, I could capitalize on it.

Rare, see I would have seen the move coming...

Why? Because we have less money... think about this... less money
means we better push non-proliferation... now this economic mess...
did it affect iran economy? If it didn't then how do you stop iran or
any economy from purchasing or getting nuclear tech etc...

if you have less money to spend and they have more, then push
non-proliferation for sure... but you need countries not your ally... see what
I mean?

So... if I was in charge of the party, I would see that I need to
have international respect and start working on that... I would make
sure we had writers out there projecting a variety of next logical move...

and as soon as Obama makes it, find the right writer who wrote
that move up and then relate it publicly as a Republican step
already thought about and good for America.

I would also do this so the people can start to associate Republican with
America and not so much with anti anything... the game is persuasion
with a broad influence... and negotiation... frankly thats how Obama
is effective. We can say what we want but to ignore this is to ignore
what works.

I would on a practical level get that law back that separates investment
banking from commercial banking. Right away to convince the American
middle class that we care about their money... I know my banker
associates would think I was the devil but we're talking about influence
now.

They would just have to wait... so that is what I would do. Also I would
point out to them if we're gonna move toward an investment/saving
economy and not a consumer economy, we got to help people feel
their money is safe with banks again.

So those are some of my crazy ideas that I would do.

Oh... I would give free classes to members about global constructs.
And would go as slow as possible... using football references.

Thank you for asking me

RFSilver

Last edited by RFSilver; 09-26-2009 at 07:31 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 07:21 AM
 
817 posts, read 852,926 times
Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
The sharks that I see being the most detrimental to this country are the homegrown fanatics, Corporate Fascism and the hate and lie spewing right wing media shills.
What about the hate and lie spewing left wing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,234,421 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedman View Post
What about the hate and lie spewing left wing?
Name a few instances, and we libs will respond. trust me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 08:10 AM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,115,129 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedman View Post
What about the hate and lie spewing left wing?
Speaking for myself, it is not hate, it is frustration and indignance at the level of ingnorance and denial as to what transpired in this country prior to Obama becoming POTUS. Please examples of the lies that the left is spewing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 08:13 AM
 
2,897 posts, read 20,337,792 times
Reputation: 4819
RFSilver, you're suggesting departing from the path of notoriety and stepping into the spotlight of respectful, dignified prominence.

Good Job! Keep on thinking!!! ... smile ...

Last edited by Topaz_Flowers; 09-26-2009 at 09:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hombre57 View Post
CAUTION; defending a fellow poster's racial slurs can cost you, but some RIGHTIES will defend other RIGHTIES at any cost, even if they're wrong. Now that's hogwash. Both of you should be ashamed of yourselves.

In context, it does not appear as if the poster is referring to "inexperience" as you suggest or believe, I will not say think, because you can't.

Attention ladies and gentlemen of the forum! We're now changing the English language: BOY now means inexperience. BLACK really means WHITE.
Agreed.

I think it is well known, especially by people who live in areas where there are a lot of African-Americans, that "boy" is racist. Anyone, regardless of life experience, can grasp that calling a grown man in his 40s "boy" is derogatory.

There are a number of posters who use these code words for racism, then hid behind the fact by trying to justify them with alternative definitions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,234,421 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by chattypatty View Post
Obama is weak, as weak as Carter ever was; Bibi is strong and experienced and has to tolerate this boy in President's clothing for a couple more years. When the Muslims deal a devastating blow to this country, Obama will go squealing to Bibi for help like a little nerd.
How dare you refer to president Obama as "BOY".


YouTube - In the Heat of the Night (1967) 1/11


YouTube - In the Heat of the Night (1967) 2/11
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,234,421 times
Reputation: 586
Default 1968 Chicago's Mayor Richard J. Daley

Shoot To Kill Order

1968 Chicago Race Riot@Everything2.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
CAUTION; defending a fellow poster's racial slurs can cost you, but some RIGHTIES will defend other RIGHTIES at any cost, even if they're wrong. Now that's hogwash. Both of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
It was not a racial slur - only a race-baiter would come to that conclusion or one who sees race in every criticism of obama.

Quote:
Attention ladies and gentlemen of the forum! We're now changing the English language: BOY now means inexperience. BLACK really means WHITE.
Yeah, "boy" is now a racial slur as defined by the leftists. I can't wait to they same the same for "girl". How utterly preposterous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top