Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
if israel attacks iran the whole middle east will go up in flames
Can you look anyone in the eyes and honestly say that you think Israel would attack Iran? The other way around seems a lot more likely.
And here's another thought: maybe this whole thread is facing in the wrong direction, and Iran is actually preparing to get another shot in at their recent enemy...Iraq. Think about it: Saddam Hussein is gone, Iraq is only a barely functional nation. And it has the additional disadvantage of having been the aggressor the last time it met Iran on the battlefield. Perhaps the Iranian government hasn't forgotten past offenses, and sees an opportunity to take revenge.
Can you look anyone in the eyes and honestly say that you think Israel would attack Iran? The other way around seems a lot more likely.
And here's another thought: maybe this whole thread is facing in the wrong direction, and Iran is actually preparing to get another shot in at their recent enemy...Iraq. Think about it: Saddam Hussein is gone, Iraq is only a barely functional nation. And it has the additional disadvantage of having been the aggressor the last time it met Iran on the battlefield. Perhaps the Iranian government hasn't forgotten past offenses, and sees an opportunity to take revenge.
Funny thing, I was just reading some analysis from late 2001 when talk began about invading Iraq and this was one of the key concerns raised at the time. It fell upon deaf ears then and it will likely fall upon deaf ears now.
If there was a target in mind for Iran, it seems quite clear that Iraq would be the logical choice.
And here's another thought: maybe this whole thread is facing in the wrong direction, and Iran is actually preparing to get another shot in at their recent enemy...Iraq. Think about it: Saddam Hussein is gone, Iraq is only a barely functional nation. And it has the additional disadvantage of having been the aggressor the last time it met Iran on the battlefield. Perhaps the Iranian government hasn't forgotten past offenses, and sees an opportunity to take revenge.
That's one of the most inexplicable theories I've ever seen on CD.
Iraq currently has a Shi'a-controlled government that is in Iran's pocket, courtesy of George W. Bush.
The raw materials needed to make mustard gas are Sulfur, Chlorine and Ethylene.
Iraq used VX nerve gas in the an-Anfal campaign. They also had developed anthrax, having been licensed by the Reagan administration to receive raw materials for that, after their record of use against the Iranians was a settled and sealed fact.
Quote:
As for the rest of your speculation about me, you have never met me and, aside from my posts on this forum, know nothing about me.
You've criticized Carter on so many mutually contradictory grounds, it's hard to keep up. If Carter can be criticized for anything, it's ever opening his trap when the Soviets tried to clear out the fundamentalists in Afghanistan--not for declining to start a war on behalf of the Shah, who nobody wanted.
We are heading to a conflict with Iran today for the same reasons we were in 1979, you are right about that. But the reasons are American arrogance, belligerence, and masochistic devotion to our Israeli "allies".
they ll gona write more amount of american in corpsepool,ME
I do not like more israeli attack nuke centre,it shall hurt them,both But america if want to give a hand it sure can,yu know why?cause its got used to die in eastlost mesopotamia ,Israel!try be a meal fit for king,,hahaha.Persians are superior in war than you throughout lifespan of earth...the rest is up to you,Persians dont fight they hunt,they r'nt Arabs they're something different,ooo if they wanna die hungry of oxygen they'll get the uranium but spread in their smokefilled air....
If Israel can make the case that their security is at risk and strikes, they have my support. I might fall left of center and I don't think there are any angels in the region, but Iran is among the most detestable of regimes.
If Israel can make the case that their security is at risk and strikes, they have my support. I might fall left of center and I don't think there are any angels in the region, but Iran is among the most detestable of regimes.
At risk?? wtf****.... how idiotic are you? A country with illegal nuclear weapons at risk??
I for one would support a strike at Israel's nuclear faciilites...
Funny thing, I was just reading some analysis from late 2001 when talk began about invading Iraq and this was one of the key concerns raised at the time. It fell upon deaf ears then and it will likely fall upon deaf ears now.
If there was a target in mind for Iran, it seems quite clear that Iraq would be the logical choice.
Agreed (and great, interesting, post Fred314X).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
they ll gona write more amount of american in corpsepool,ME
