Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NewsMax, WorldNetDaily, FOX, the Examiner. Not quite MSM and thoroughly NOT either fact-checked or as much as clearly thought through by you and your laughable gaggle of confrères. Wagyu beef, death panels, Air Force One, Martha's Vineyard, date night. First Lady's law license revoked, acccessing CARS.com lets feds own your computer, Obama throws out Free Speech clause. Give me an excuse for that kind of mindless crap.
There are a variety of sources, including the NYT, the WaPo and other left-wing rags. Are those the only stories you remember?
How about continuing bush wiretapping policies, mandating a "new" tax for all Americans, politicizing the NEA, an administration filled to the brim with unconfirmed radical czars.
OK so every time you post the NSA gets a copy along with your IP address.
Thanks to the Patriot Act
**************************************************
Gravity is a Socialist plot to keep us all down
That doesn't quite answer my question, does it sanrene?
Bush and Palin attacked others. They therefore set themselves to play that game. Obama attacked no one. My question to you is therefore perfectly credible.
You can't answer the question truthfully, because the truth would expose you. But that's okay. The truth is evident, anyway.
When did bush attack anyone? Or Palin?
And obama hasn't? He has demonized CEO's, tea party protesters, insurance companies, Chrysler and GM investors/creditors...please, the list is long of the people he has practiced divisive partisan politics.
You know there has never, ever been an instance of you ever admonishing one of your own when they use derogatory names for bush.
The truth and you know it.
In light of that FACT, you don't have any credibility asking the question.
Oh, this is an easy one. Just go look at the house bills put forth by the democrats in 2007 and 2008 to cut funding for the troops.
There aren't any. The Dems ran in 2006 on a promise NOT to defund the troops under any circumstances. I suspect that you now want to hide behind a claim that "cut" and "defund" refer to any attempt at or even discussion of providing Bush with one dime less than what he requested. That isn't what the words mean, dishonest one. It's not nice to fool Mother Funk & Wagnall's. Now, unless you've got otherwise -- as in an actual example of Democrats seeking actual defunding -- well...
Last edited by saganista; 09-26-2009 at 07:10 PM..
Oh. Haven't you heard? Obamacare will mandate you have insurance (a tax), if you don't do that, you will be fined (taxed) by the IRS and possible jailed.
You know, a few months in jail might be a nice vacation! JK!
And obama hasn't? He has demonized CEO's, tea party protesters, insurance companies, Chrysler and GM investors/creditors...please, the list is long of the people he has practiced divisive partisan politics.
You know there has never, ever been an instance of you ever admonishing one of your own when they use derogatory names for bush.
The truth and you know it.
In light of that FACT, you don't have any credibility asking the question.
Again: LMAO. Obama has "demonized"? Pathetic--really, really pathetic dip into the world of unreality, sanrene.
It's a simple question. Seems like a straightforward answer would be easy: Why do you call Obama denigrating names? Yet, you repeatedly hide behind smoke screens, questioning the question's "credibility." I guess your understanding of "credibility" is on par with your understanding of "supplication."
Oh well. Some people don't have the courage of their convictions, I guess.
dear good hearted OP.
the people your call conservatives are fascists. go watch pre WWII films same behavior same anger same appearance. the one leading them who calls himself a true american is fat, all in black bald and angry. his followers-- 20 million-- imitate him and adore him. they feed on his hate. look at the films same same same.
Yes, I seem to recall Saggy was very upset over $500 Billion deficit - a $9 Trillion deficit and he is happy as a clam. What could be the difference?
Nine years, actual versus projected, plus one Republican-bred near-depression to deal with? Any of that ring a bell? Would you know what it meant if it did?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
