Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2009, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Do not fear, liberalism is on its way out.

Obama has just destroyed that.

The last election is NOT a way to believe the country is because the election of ObamAcorn was only caused by independents and left side republicans voting for Obama.

Without those groups the dems are hurting.

The dems have had their chance, control of congress for 3 years and Obama for 10 months and people see they are total failures.

Do not use your maps for anything of value, it is a false ideal map.

Things will change in time, the end of liberalism is very near.


four straight polls have Obama's approval at 56%, a higher % than what he got last year on Election Day. Yet people see him as a failure?? Interesting math skills there......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,739,062 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Ok, a little more than just the south as portions of the Plains States & Rocky Mountain west (minus Colorado) but it isn't 50/50. They are basically done for in the mid-atlantic, north east, midwest & west coast.
too many are forgetting, what happened in 2008 isn't indictative of much, plus registration and voting are two totally differnt things. Let's see what happens 12 and 1/2 months from now??

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,739,062 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by halleda View Post
Maybe it's because we place the interests of our children and grandchildren over our own selfish interests. They will be paying for that government intrusion long after we are all dead. But then this government has, almost since its conception, been all about taking power from individuals or states and placing them in the federal government's hands.
exactly, that has been my point all along. I care for the future of my kids, grandkids and my one great grandchild. Too many, especially some of the very young on here do not have a clue. They haven't lived long enough to experience life as it is and will be.
'
Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,739,062 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
You're putting the health of your children and grandchildern at risk, for your own interest. Too many assume that their offspring will be able to afford health care in the future. The Wal-mart of the Future won't be offering it, as it's been deemed un-necessary by the conservatives in government and the people.
First of all, this is totally off the subject of the south and conservatism and second, most Americans are not oppossed to health reform, we just want to make it fair for all, not just those who don't pay anything or very little. But again, you and Purple lOve are off the subject.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
too many are forgetting, what happened in 2008 isn't indictative of much, plus registration and voting are two totally differnt things. Let's see what happens 12 and 1/2 months from now??

Nita


I'm not just talking about the 08 election, though it does show the GOP's problem, but the overall down turn of the GOP outside of the south over the past 15 years.

The fact that during the last 5 Presidential elections, the Dems have swept the entire mid-atlantic, north-east & New England (minus New Hampshire once in 2000, which was Nader related), have swept the upper mid west in the last 5 as well (including Iowa in 4 of the last 5, with the loss being less than 1 point) swept the west coast as well. That is a problem for the GOP. The fact that the GOP has no members of Congress in ALL of New England, 2 of the 28 members of Congress from NY (one is vacant with an upcoming Special Election).

The GOP has some very severe problems outside of the south, and granted while things may not be like 08 forever, the problems the GOP has outside of the south wasn't just 2008, but something which has been moving in that direction over time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,033,943 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Ehh the GOP was only relevant in the south argument wasn't made prior to Reagan's victory...
Actually it was.. Sunbelt Conservatives were a major voter demographic in the 70s and 80s. It was proven beginning in 1976 that the South had gained considerable ground in national elections, and it was the first time in over 100 years that the South decided an election. At the time, Southern voters were mostly suburban whites, which included refugees from the Rust Belt/Northeast.

Personally, I always felt people should be allowed to vote for whoever they want without being reprimanded..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:31 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,000,893 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
The last time the Dems went on a big kick about how the GOP was only relevant in the south anymore, a man by the name of Ronald Reagan turned the electoral map red. I wouldn't get too caught up on pushing the "southern party" thing again.
Whole different era. Americans are very polarized and vocal now due to the endless baiting by limbaugh, hannity, beck & co.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
Actually it was.. Sunbelt Conservatives were a major voter demographic in the 70s and 80s. It was proven beginning in 1976 that the South had gained considerable ground in national elections, and it was the first time in over 100 years that the South decided an election. At the time, Southern voters were mostly suburban whites, which included refugees from the Rust Belt/Northeast.

Personally, I always felt people should be allowed to vote for whoever they want without being reprimanded..
Your missing the point. A poster suggested that the current talk that the GOP isn't all that relevant outside of the south was made prior to Reagan. That simply isn't the case. No one made that suggestion prior to Reagan. Hell looking at the 76 election, the GOP did quite well in the northeast, upper mid west & west coast. It was the south where they had problems due to Carter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:51 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,306,908 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
Whole different era. Americans are very polarized and vocal now due to the endless baiting by limbaugh, hannity, beck & co.

This was already being done because of Clinton. Long before Hannity and Beck were superstars.

There is no more vocal people then those who idolized Clinton and when Bush came into office the left wing kooks came out of hiding to become extremely vocal and full of hate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 07:56 PM
 
Location: ✶✶✶✶
15,216 posts, read 30,558,979 times
Reputation: 10851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
and when Bush came into office the left wing kooks came out of hiding to become extremely vocal and full of hate.
Then 9/11 happened and the Bush critics were easily marginalized as traitors and terrorist sympathizers. Then Obama becomes president and the rules changed again.

For the record, I despise both parties, although there are certain individuals in both I don't mind too much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top