Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2009, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,246,649 times
Reputation: 4937

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
I suppose right-wingers would have felt better if we had simply nationalized all health insurance companies. That would have worked too. And faster.
Doing so would have made the banking bailout look like nothing financially. In other words, we could not afford it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2009, 01:40 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,387,780 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
That's huge, considering Democrats need Lieberman's vote to make a full 60 vote, filibuster-proof majority. If the RINO's from Maine crater, it's still possible, but who's to say that all the Blue Dogs are on board with the final bill? Health Care Reform is far from certain at this point, it seems.
The question is not whether Lieberman votes for the final passage of a healthcare bill, but whether he will vote with the democrats for cloture. All that is needed to pass a bill on the final vote is 50 + Biden it is only the procedural vote that needs sixty. On top of that there is the standing threat that, while people are free to vote their conscience on bills they owe loyalty to their party for procedural votes, and if someone goes against the party on a procedural vote they lose their committee assignments also while Lieberman is technically an "independent" he caucuses with the Democrats and relies on them for committee assignments...So while Lieberman may be against the Baucus bill it is questionable whether he will vote against cloture and risk his chairmanship of the Homeland Security sub-committee to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,800,800 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
That's huge, considering Democrats need Lieberman's vote to make a full 60 vote, filibuster-proof majority. If the RINO's from Maine crater, it's still possible, but who's to say that all the Blue Dogs are on board with the final bill? Health Care Reform is far from certain at this point, it seems.
Don't count on "traiter Joe" !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 01:46 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,908,341 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
I suspect that Lieberman WILL NOT vote with the Democrats on the final vote. Nor I suspect, will Senator Snowe.

There are also other Democrats who are opposed to these reforms or are leaning against reforms - especially the so-called public "option".
snowe voted for the bank bailout and the auto bailout. she favors cap and trade as well. she will vote for this insurance industry handout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 01:49 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
The question is not whether Lieberman votes for the final passage of a healthcare bill, but whether he will vote with the democrats for cloture. All that is needed to pass a bill on the final vote is 50 + Biden it is only the procedural vote that needs sixty. On top of that there is the standing threat that, while people are free to vote their conscience on bills they owe loyalty to their party for procedural votes, and if someone goes against the party on a procedural vote they lose their committee assignments also while Lieberman is technically an "independent" he caucuses with the Democrats and relies on them for committee assignments...So while Lieberman may be against the Baucus bill it is questionable whether he will vote against cloture and risk his chairmanship of the Homeland Security sub-committee to do so.
And Snowe's voting with the Democrats to get this bill out of committee could indicate her openness to voting with the Democrats on cloture as well. Just today's switch put her committee assignments in jeopardy, the question she has to deal with is really more about her constituents at home and her re-election chances. Given Maine's healthcare problems, she might just improve her re-election chances by going with the Democrats on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 02:02 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,464,947 times
Reputation: 4013
Sen. Snowe already has astronomically high approval ratings from her constituents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 02:07 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,964 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13677
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
And Snowe's voting with the Democrats to get this bill out of committee could indicate her openness to voting with the Democrats on cloture as well. Just today's switch put her committee assignments in jeopardy, the question she has to deal with is really more about her constituents at home and her re-election chances. Given Maine's healthcare problems, she might just improve her re-election chances by going with the Democrats on this.
...until they get the bill for it.
Dem Senator Warns of 'Big, Big Tax' on Middle Class in Baucus Bill - The Note
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 02:10 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,464,947 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Doing so would have made the banking bailout look like nothing financially. In other words, we could not afford it.
You think health insurance companies need to be recapitalized? Liquidity is somehow their big problem?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 02:12 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I think, though, that Maine already has problems with soaring healthcare costs. The people of Maine may consider the bill a bargain compared with their current situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2009, 02:52 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,964 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13677
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I think, though, that Maine already has problems with soaring healthcare costs. The people of Maine may consider the bill a bargain compared with their current situation.
How so? Those high-priced Maine insurance policies are going to be hit with a 40% excise tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top