Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, when Bush listens to his Generals, and sends a SURGE of 30,000 new troops into Iraq, that is a GOOD THING?
And this action gets CHEERED ON by Republicans.
However, when Obama listens to his Generals, and sends a SURGE of 40,000 new troops into Afghanistan, that is a BAD THING?
Typical Republican HYPOCRITES!
I'm against war. Always have been. It's obvious you're a partisan hack because you're assuming that Republicans are pro-war. But I digress...your defense is that he's the same as Bush, just sending them to a different theatre? Doesn't sound like much of a defense to me. Rush will surely cheer this on, while the paleo-conservative wing of the Republican party, as well as anti-war liberals, will surely boo this. But, it pays to throw liberals under the bus. After all, where else are they going to go, right?
So, when Bush listens to his Generals, and sends a SURGE of 30,000 new troops into Iraq, that is a GOOD THING?
And this action gets CHEERED ON by Republicans.
However, when Obama listens to his Generals, and sends a SURGE of 40,000 new troops into Afghanistan, that is a BAD THING?
Typical Republican HYPOCRITES!
Bush did not recieve the Nobel Peace Prize. Further, Iraq was able to be won. Afganistan will go on forever without victory, as there is not a social or political structure about which a nation can be created.
Bush did not recieve the Nobel Peace Prize. Further, Iraq was able to be won. Afganistan will go on forever without victory, as there is not a social or political structure about which a nation can be created.
Big difference there.
And thanks for your EXPERT military opinion on this matter.
With your kind of EXPERT advice readily available, why should Obama bother listening to his inexperienced know-nothing Generals?
And thanks for your EXPERT military opinion on this matter.
With your kind of EXPERT advice readily available, why should Obama bother listening to his inexperienced know-nothing Generals?
Obama = Bush. Enjoy!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rush will surely cheer this on, while the paleo-conservative wing of the Republican party, as well as anti-war liberals, will surely boo this. But, it pays to throw liberals under the bus. After all, where else are they going to go, right? 
