Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually if the Supreme Court rules that, it is constitutional, by definition.
When the Third Reich court ruled that Jews were to be held under "protective custody", it was considered constitutional as per the Reichstag's version, so I don't disagree.
When the Third Reich court ruled that Jews were to be held under "protective custody", it was considered constitutional as per the Reichstag's version, so I don't disagree.
When the Third Reich court ruled that Jews were to be held under "protective custody", it was considered constitutional as per the Reichstag's version, so I don't disagree.
I only recognize Godwin's law as it applies to referring to others as Nazis.
***** to Mike Godwin not me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
Usenet Message-ID: <1991Aug18.215029.19421@eff.org>, 18 Aug 1991
LOL Did you really say that? Oh no the guys carrying the gun are just peaceful citizens. I'm sure they never use them to shoot anything.
I'll pass your advice along to the Secret Service.
The Secret Service is well aware already. That's why there was little concern in Phoenix with several people carrying firearms in an area where the President was giving a speech.
The Secret Service is well aware already. That's why there was little concern in Phoenix with several people carrying firearms in an area where the President was giving a speech.
They were far removed from the President's location. In addition, I'm sure the Secret Service has someone who had a clear shot of each of theses yahoos. Armed public are not allowed near the president regardless of local law.
They were far removed from the President's location. In addition, I'm sure the Secret Service has someone who had a clear shot of each of theses yahoos. Armed public are not allowed near the president regardless of local law.
I doubt they'd always have a clear shot. He's around other people so their heads get in the way. I think you just want to believe that they had full control of the situation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think you just want to believe that they had full control of the situation.
