Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why would you use racism as the moral pretext to promote degeneracy? This is how western society functions today. Society feels so guilty about dropping the Christian moral law and all of the damage it has brought upon the family that it over reaches in protecting special groups. The guilt of Protestant whites and others who wanted their porn and their out of wedlock transient sex gave birth to the civil rights movement.
Social engineering like affirmative action, hate crimes, school busing and housing projects have been a impotent replacement for the moral order. By dropping the moral law more damage has been done to these poor groups than any Jim Crow law could ever have. The truth is that these liberal concerns have nothing to do with protecting black families and selfishly ensure the sexual revolution can continue so that the powerful can push their degeneracy on the rest of us. That is why homosexuals are often lumped in to the civil rights movement as they have very transient sexual lives that are attractive to those that want to continue the sexual revolution. All of those civil rights laws and other social engineering technologies have been a failure. The moral law is the only protection the poor will ever have in this world and sadly it has been taken away from them.
The primary thing that the civil rights movement was concerned about was co-opting the loose sexual morals of the most unbridled elements of the black community and transposing them on the mainstream. The civil rights social engineering was the moral (but weak)justification for the crime of subverting moral law. They promoted the worst of African American culture while ignoring the best of it. The black family has suffered the most.
This is why pop culture is now dominated by images from the black community. This was the Harlem Renaissance and it was more about the guy on the corner getting high or unending transient relationships, than any productive segment of the black community educating themselves and climbing the social ladder. Black people in media are promoted as the gangster, the sexual Mandingo and masters of Dionysis. It is a portrayal that is mostly fiction and has ruined the fiber of the black community. Read Norman Mailer's "The White Negro" or Kerouac's "On The Road" to see the birth of what was known as "spade kicks" to be integrated into the mainstream.
The stable elements in black society were not helped by the civil rights movement. In fact they were crushed by the civil rights movement. Before the civil rights movement the legitimacy rate in the black community was 70%+; now it is down below 20%. This ruination of the family will do more to hurt community than any other social aspect. The civil rights movement has destroyed these people by crushing the moral law and co-opting the worst parts of the black mores; transient sexual relationships, use of drugs, and selling them to the mainstream as normal. The civil rights movement has been an abject failure for the black community precisely because it was more about enslaving all of us to the worst of the African Passions than freeing anyone. While all of our children have suffered the poor blacks have suffered the most under this regime.
Using racism as a pretext to giving license to sexual degeneracy is not a valid argument. When moral law is once again mainstream progress can be made, until then the decent into the moral abyss will continue.
Can I use "the Worst of the African Passions" as my status line?
Ahh yes, because everyone equates the Civil Rights Movement with the Sexual Revolution?!? I think someone is afraid the "African passion" will be directed at white women. The OP is obviously deranged and I am not going to continue to provide a forum for this hate speech.
dear OP
are you saying that liberal elements come out of the closet from the 60' s in the AA community and unmined many of the good moral church based ethics that made the AA community stong and stable? because if you are that would also be very true of the white community.
Yes this is one of the primary tenets of the post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948
dear OP
are you saying that liberal elements come out of the closet from the 60' s in the AA community and unmined many of the good moral church based ethics that made the AA community stong and stable? because if you are that would also be very true of the white community.
Yesterday about everning time, NPR black reporter was interviewing some black harvard graduate star guest for his childhood trouble.
When he mentioned about in his 4th grade he hit his PREGNANT teacher because the teach hit him as punishment for incompetent school performance, all the audience laugh out cute.
Very awkward feeling, I was about to throw up ... ...
A smug response containing tainted numbers. This type of smug pragmatic little characters are often the shepards that occumpany the duious numbers that have little corrolaction to reality.
One walk down the street in the Camden's, Newarks and Detroits of America will tell the real story. The use of these numbers is how groups like LTCM won the Nobel in economics based on the numbers and promptly lost $4 billion two years later in disgrace. These are enron type numbers that do not tell the real story of the destruction of the AA family.
These numbers hardly are a direct indicator of the strength of the AA family and community. One walk down the street in Detroit will reveal the real toll of the Civil Rights Movement and the sexual Revolution it was meant to justify.
Does a high school diploma of 2003 really equate to the high school diploma of 1966? Hasn't social engineering introduced thing like "no child left behind" and "social promotion". Back in 1966 a high school diploma meant you mastered English, math and the classical study of history. Now it means you showed your face enough and can likely read. Back then elementary education ended after 8th grade, often those going into the vocations left school, once again number skewed to justify the social failures of liberalism.
College enrollments have swelled not because of some great intellectual Renaissance in learning but because jobs in the vocations have been outsourced over seas. In 1964 a young person could look forward to a profitable job in the manufacturing industry's of the north those jobs are now offshore. Now these people are going to college, often while behind bars or only to end up working in the service industry. Not to mention billions yearly have been dumped into government programs to ensure growth in these numbers. Does a college degree really mean the same thing in 1964 as it does in 2009? College has become a place to become indoctrinated and where good minds go to die.
The real proof is in the family and on the corner. The civil rights movement has been a disaster of institutionalized degeneracy and moral decay based on racial eugenics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto
Ah, the daily blacks thread...
Let's see. Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Poverty rate for African Americans
1966 - 41.8%
2006 - 23.9%
African Americans with a high school diploma
1966 - 26%
2003 - 80%
College Students and Graduates
1964 - 306,000
2002 - 2.3 million
Elected Officals
1970 - 1,469
2001 - 9,101 including the President of the United States.
You were saying?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
