Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2009, 02:01 PM
 
8,762 posts, read 11,572,548 times
Reputation: 3398

Advertisements

Administration plans big pay cuts at bailout firms - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091021/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama_executive_pay - broken link)


"The Obama administration plans to order companies that received huge government bailouts last year to sharply cut the compensation of their highest paid executives, according to a person familiar with the decision."

Excellent. Why should executives and CEO's be getting bailed out when they are in business because of OUR tax money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
LOL..most of the really big ones paid back that TARP so they wouldn't have to abide by that.
They are borrowing government money from other avenues that don't require "approval" on pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:41 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
Obama thinks he is the emporor it seeems. That should have been in teh original bailout rules but like evryhting else he can't get it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:45 PM
 
8,762 posts, read 11,572,548 times
Reputation: 3398
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Obama thinks he is the emporor it seeems. That should have been in teh original bailout rules but like evryhting else he can't get it right.
Ok I will bite.

What did he not get right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:56 PM
 
Location: The Great State of Texas, Finally!
5,476 posts, read 12,244,635 times
Reputation: 2825
Wait until he offers bailouts for small business and then hangs that over their heads by dictating their pay as well. Isn't tyranny wonderful?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,281,090 times
Reputation: 3826
The moneychangers own Mr. Obama. There will be loopholes and workarounds for these people, or the moneychangers will see to it that Mr. Obama will not see a 2nd term, either by election loss or otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:58 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,452,545 times
Reputation: 9596
They never should have asked for OR TAKEN a federal bailout.

Now that they have it simply gives a reason for the federal government to assert power over private companies.

Those companies should have gone through bankruptcy and reorganized.

Come back leaner and meaner. Instead they wimped and whined and got the US taxpayers to bail their tails out of the trench. Laughing all the way to the bank and having lavish parties and giving each other bonuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
So here are the 7..the others paid back:

"The seven companies are: Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial."

None of those 7 are in any financial position to be paying out millions so it becomes a moot point.
Notice GS and JPM are not listed ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 04:01 PM
 
596 posts, read 889,779 times
Reputation: 1090
As a stockholder, I think this is a lousy idea. Now every company that is thinking about getting into bed with the government, will want to risk failure instead, rather than risk their best talent going somewhere else with better pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top