Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2009, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Way,Way Up On The Old East Coast
2,196 posts, read 1,993,970 times
Reputation: 1089

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Well....if the first one was such a rousing success, why would we need another? This confirms what many have known for months now - $1 Trillion already down the toilet - accomplished little if any of it's goals set out by obama.

EPIC fail.

Pelosi Refuses to Call New Spending Another Stimulus Package - Roll Call



Utter disaster.

What a gift for 2010.
Greetings,

Indeed .... How much more ? How much more can America withstand ?

Truly "Staggering" .... are the "Savage Blows" leveled against this beloved nation from within and without !

Where is the desperately needed effective "Leadership" that should be coming from the current occupants of the White House ???

And what of the U.S. Treasury ? ..... At the unprecedented rate that "Trillions" are being spent, how much longer until the building is "Padlocked" and out of business ?

If these are the much advertised "Changes" so vehemently promised during the Presidents extremely elaborate campaign ..... We "The American People" are most definitely "In For It" !!!

Think About It ! ..... But Please, don't take very long !

Thank you / Lamar
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2009, 07:48 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,467,877 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
They went about it the wrong way - instead of putting the stimulus into the hands of those who would spend it directly (consumers), they put it in the hands of bureaucrats.
Completely false. Go back and read the bill. $288 billion in tax cuts. $83 billion in benefits to low-income workers and retirees. $87 billion to Medicaid. $25 billion to pick up 65% of COBRA payments for those forced into them. $45 billion in budget support to local school districts. $15 billion in Pell grants. $13 billion for Head Start and IDEA. $9 billion in direct state budget support. Once again, you don't know what you are talking about...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,450,777 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Completely false. Go back and read the bill. $288 billion in tax cuts. $83 billion in benefits to low-income workers and retirees. $87 billion to Medicaid. $25 billion to pick up 65% of COBRA payments for those forced into them. $45 billion in budget support to local school districts. $15 billion in Pell grants. $13 billion for Head Start and IDEA. $9 billion in direct state budget support. Once again, you don't know what you are talking about...
Is there anything that you believe the current administration isn't doing right ?
You defend this administration more than the administration does themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 07:53 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
How utterly ignorant. How many paychecks are those $13 in? How many times to biweekly paychecks get sent out? Do you know why the tax cut was disbursed this way? I'll tell you...because when Bushie sent out those lump-sum stimulus checks, bozos used them to add to savings or pay down down debt. Both of those actions serve to undercut the stimulus effects of the stimulus checks. Brilliant!!! So, we had to break the payments up into little tiny pieces so that you wouldn't have much choice but just to spend them as they came, which of course is the whole point. I actually do know 34th-graders who understand this crap and right-wingers don't...what's to be done with these people...
$52 a month is NOT the kind of spending that will spur a recovery in the economy. That kind of money, especially to those who are in dire need, is used for subsistence ONLY.

When I got my stimulus check of $800 dollars a few years back - I bought a saddle, a very nice saddle - that is the kind of spending that will spur the economy.

Last edited by Reads2MUCH; 10-22-2009 at 03:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 07:57 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
$83 billion in benefits to low-income workers and retirees. $87 billion to Medicaid. $25 billion to pick up 65% of COBRA payments for those forced into them. $45 billion in budget support to local school districts. $15 billion in Pell grants. $13 billion for Head Start and IDEA. $9 billion in direct state budget support. Once again, you don't know what you are talking about...
On the contrary, virtually none of this list creates jobs.

The aid to the states has already been shown to not of had the effect that was intended. They used the money instead to close budget gaps.

Benefits to low-income workers and retirees - does not create jobs.
Medicaid - no jobs.
COBRA - no jobs.
Local school district - probably saved some jobs that might have been cut...or maybe not.

All that in bold? Just what I said - into the hands of bureaucrats. Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118
Oh saggy, obama and his "uniquely qualified" team used that chart to show us what the stimulus would prevent - UE rising above 8%. What the stimulus would accomplish, job creation. You just can't get around those basic facts. It is their chart, their report, their numbers, all wrong, wrong, wrong.

He said much more than that saggy, much more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 08:40 PM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,902,760 times
Reputation: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
There is a saying when you are in a hole stop digging, clearly Obama hasn't heard it.

Judging from your post the left is out of gas all they have is name calling and enemies lists.

By the way Obama assured us unemployment wouldn't rise above 8% if stimulus was passed. How did that work out? I guess he didn't snap his fingers hard enough.
Nobody thought the recession would be as deep as it was.

The CBO thought unemployment would not top 8.3% as of January 2009.

Its time to let go of that talking point.
Nobody had it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 08:45 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,467,877 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Surely this is a joke post ? Did the right-wing also make up that chart the President showed to get his stimulus passed ? Or was that all a fake as well ? That chart was done by Obama's team..not some right-wing fairy tale cartoon factory.
I realize you don't have the time or inclination to go out and get a degree in stat econ, so PAY ATTENTION: The original chart is from a projection done in late December 2008 using the most recent data available at that time. The purpose of the projection (which was done by what would become staff at the CEA) was to show the future of unemployment rates both with and without a stimulus plan of roughly the magnitude that had been talked about up to that time. It shows that with a stimulus plan, unemployment would peak earlier and at a lower level than without a stimulus plan. That is its only point and its only conclusion.

Now, over at the left-hand side of that chart is a scale. The numbers on it were determined by the data on which the projection was based. Keep in mind that the unemployment rate in November 2008 was 6.7% and that private forecasters were at the time seeing peak rates in 2009 of from 8% to 8.25%. The CEA projection shows unemployment peaking at about 8% with a stimulus bill, and more than a year further out at about 9.2% without a stimulus bill. NEITHER OF THOSE NUMBERS IS A FREAKING PREDICTION OR PROMISE OF ANYTHING AT ALL AND NO ONE EVER SAID THAT THEY WERE!!! They are simply the numbers that resolve at the end of a series of equations based on the data available at the time. If you were to run that very same projection today, the shapes of the two curves would be almost identical, but with the stimulus, unemployment might be shown to peak at 11.0% and without at perhaps 12.2%. Those numbers wouldn't be a prediction or a promise of anything either.

Now, do you think you have that particular toxic asset moved off your balance sheet, or do you still need another bailout???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 08:45 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,087,528 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
So far we have an article saying it has created or saved around 30,000. Less than 1% of what Obama promised.
even worse, 25% of who received jobs, are already unemployed. And thats from Obamas own figures..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2009, 08:48 PM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,902,760 times
Reputation: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Here ya go..Biden admits that "EVERYONE guessed wrong" so that lets them off the hook for the out of whack unemployment estimations. I mean..it was "everyone" so how was the WH to know better ?

Vice President Joe Biden says 'everyone guessed wrong' on jobs number | National News - cleveland.com - - cleveland.com
I'll try to explain this to you.

Your job is to graph out unemployment on a chart for the next two years.
You don't have a working crystal ball, so you use the CBO's numbers.
Or the OMB's numbers.
Or a combination of specialist's predictions.

Nobody was right.
The free market lost more jobs than anyone expected.

But that does not change the number of jobs created directly by the stimulus, so I wonder why people on this forum keep trying to use it as an argument against the stimulus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top