Should Glen Beck be taken off the air? (dictators, compare, financial)

[Greatday]

Originally Posted by compJockey

No, they are not.
He'll give you a little piece of truth and then launch into a paranoid fantasy.

To the contrary - Beck documents (well documents) his positions - and they are all available for review on his website.

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by USNRET04

If a movie producer makes dozens of ax-murdering sorority killer movies and eventually, someone kills a college girl with an ax, should we defend the right for movie producers to continue making those kind of movies, or should we ask for a complete shutdown of Hollywood?

Why isn't slander protected by the first amendment?

Why did Dr. Tiller get shot by a Fox fanatic?
Can you connect a dot or two, or should I help you out with that?

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by Greatday

To the contrary - Beck documents (well documents) his positions - and they are all available for review on his website.

Because his fantasies are documented you take them for fact.
Great logic there.

[Greatday]

Originally Posted by compJockey

Because his fantasies are documented you take them for fact.
Great logic there.

Because his FACTS are verifiable with credible sources and resources - I will then consider Becks facts as credible.

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by Greatday

Because his FACTS are verifiable with credible sources and resources - I will then consider Becks facts as credible.

When you don't know about a subject, you won't be able to tell what information Beck IS NOT GIVING YOU.

You are not getting anywhere close to the full story from his little entertainment show.

But hey, delusions are fun.
By all means, help yourself to some more Beck hallucinations.

[Greatday]

Originally Posted by compJockey

When you don't know about a subject, you won't be able to tell what information Beck IS NOT GIVING YOU.

You are not getting anywhere close to the full story from his little entertainment show.

But hey, delusions are fun.
By all means, help yourself to some more Beck hallucinations.

Isn't it "strange" how some of those "hallucinations" are proving to be factual - and causing some intense discomfort for the Obama Administration?

I mean, where is Van Jones? And, how about the Acorn investigations? And, much more.

You continue to hallucinate that Becks facts are hallucinations. ROFLMAO!!!!!

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by Greatday

Isn't it "strange" how some of those "hallucinations" are proving to be factual - and causing some intense discomfort for the Obama Administration?

I mean, where is Van Jones? And, how about the Acorn investigations? And, much more.

You continue to hallucinate that Becks facts are hallucinations. ROFLMAO!!!!!

You probably believe the latest Jennings smears as well.

That you take those Acorn investigations seriously is telling.
That you take Beck seriously is telling.

Anything Fox feeds you, you lap up.

[Greatday]

The fact that Jones left in the middle of the night is telling

The fact that Acorn is taking the allegations seriously is telling

ROFLMAOOOOO

[robbobobbo]

Well, I was going to answer "no, he shouldn't be taken off the air" which is the thread subject, but the poll was "do you think he's nuts?" which I would have to answer "yes".

[Yeledaf]

Originally Posted by Greatday

The fact that Jones left in the middle of the night is telling

The fact that Acorn is taking the allegations seriously is telling

ROFLMAOOOOO

Guess Jones and Acorn are lapping, too.