The theory is now a conspiracy and facts don't lie, do they? (Pelosi, Canada)

[roysoldboy]

Pretty darned good reading and it does give the grounds for the next set of court cases involving the status of The Great One as a candidate for election of President of the US. It is a fairly long read but a good one at that. Now if it is too long let me suggest that you skip over all the writing and go to the forms that have been reproduced to show what actually did happen which is not what should have happened. I see Nancy Pelosi's signature on a paper that claims to be something but really isn't.

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie

[Greatwoods]

The heading and signature line of those documents are exactly the same. Someone could have altered the main paragraph with a word processor. Not saying it's fake, but it sure ain't proof of anything either. For this to mean anything, you'd have to see the actual document and verify the stamp and signature.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Greatwoods

The heading and signature line of those documents are exactly the same. Someone could have altered the main paragraph with a word processor. Not saying it's fake, but it sure ain't proof of anything either. For this to mean anything, you'd have to see the actual document and verify the stamp and signature.

I see that you surely did look at the forms that Nasty Nancy affixed her name to. You did, didn't you.

I am very sorry that I didn't change a word or two in the title of the thread if it really bothers you so much. Now you get down to the copies of those forms that Nancy did affix her name to.

[Bluefly]

Roy... you do realize how old this is, don't you?

You do realize how hatefully biased the source is, don't you? I mean, just read the hate-monger's introduction before getting to his "evidence". For that matter, just look at the whole website!

You do realize that because someone posts something on the internet (or says something on your TV) that it doesn't make it true, don't you?

Come on, man. You're better than this. People have been making fake documents about Obama since all the credible efforts at discrediting him failed. Some guy claims to have a notarized copy and you believe him? You should demand proof if you're going to believe these people.

Let us know what Beck thinks about this so we can know what you think about it.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Bluefly

Roy... you do realize how old this is, don't you?

You do realize how hatefully biased the source is, don't you? I mean, just read the hate-monger's introduction before getting to his "evidence". For that matter, just look at the whole website!

You do realize that because someone posts something on the internet (or says something on your TV) that it doesn't make it true, don't you?

Come on, man. You're better than this. People have been making fake documents about Obama since all the credible efforts at discrediting him failed. Some guy claims to have a notarized copy and you believe him? You should demand proof if you're going to believe these people.

Let us know what Beck thinks about this so we can know what you think about it.

I see that you didn't see the documents that were discussed here. Right? I would say that your refusal to look at things from that source may be about like me looking at things from Kos, HuffPo, or MediaMatters because of the source. I never look at any of those places unless someone links them here and I do that so I can argue with some knowledge of what is going on. I often mention the source but never until I see what has been linked. I do try very hard to be what I ask from others.

Do you know where we can get hold of the documents that are real, if these aren't real?