Homosexuals indoctrinating our children (amendment, constitution, enemies, statistics)

[Zimbochick]

Originally Posted by sailordave

Missionary is best if the woman's hips are elevated on a cushion to the height of a man's hips when he's up on his knees.

Late night sex talk from Sailordave! Who knew. Would be a great title for a late night radio show.

[karfar]

Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale

You are now free to go out and have as much oral and anal sex as you want without fear of being arrested.

Of course, those laws were never used against heterosexuals, so you have nothing to worry about. (Yes, I'll always be a little bit bitter about it!)

Yeah, in the back of my mind I was always like "This just ain't right, my fellow best friend could get arrested for this"...The laws can simply bite me.

[moonshadow]

Originally Posted by karfar

I do believe that sodomy is still considered a crime in some states.....

...Of America?

I think the last state to decriminalize it here was Tassie in 1997. Not that long ago really.

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Originally Posted by sailordave

Missionary is best if the woman's hips are elevated on a cushion to the height of a man's hips when he's up on his knees.

As long as the lighting is good and the camera can capture everything, it works for me.

[Reads2MUCH]

Originally Posted by Zimbochick

Late night sex talk from Sailordave! Who knew. Would be a great title for a late night radio show.

He's right though, the cushion thing does work well.

[momonkey]

Originally Posted by Bluefly

The difference is that one is constructed (the religious argument) and one is inherently embedded in the individual (the sexuality).

To give both equal footing would be like saying "most people think black people are human but others think they are sub-human".

Obviously, the latter group is a bunch of racists with a social agenda while the former group ackknowledges the realities of nature. We can't let every radical social agenda infect our educational system, so we must let nature take the lead. If children are clearly gay when they are 5, 6, 7 years old, then it is part of their nature and must be respected as natural.

I've just known too many individuals like that and this oppression of their rights and liberties has to stop. This is the land of the free.

So it's OK for an anti-religious gay organization to teach their values to young children in the public school system?

When has Focus on the Family called anyone sub-human?

[Smash255]

Originally Posted by momonkey

So it's OK for an anti-religious gay organization to teach their values to young children in the public school system?

When has Focus on the Family called anyone sub-human?

Teaching tolerance does not = anti-religious gay organization

Serious where the hell do you come up with this crap??

[momonkey]

Originally Posted by Smash255

That is one of the absurd leaps in logic I have ever heard.

You do realize that not everyone that doesn't hold the views that gay people are evil are anti-religious correct??

Fix the second line then get back to me about my logic.

[Zimbochick]

Originally Posted by Reads2MUCH

He's right though, the cushion thing does work well.

On that note I'm off to wake up the missionary. Night all.

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Originally Posted by Smash255

Teaching tolerance does not = anti-religious gay organization

Serious where the hell do you come up with this crap??

It's like I said. There are those who believe that anyone who is not anti-gay must be gay, mentally deranged, anti-religious, or some combination of the three.