Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2009, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Higher taxes will produce inflation anyway, since higher taxes will make Americans less productive by having the rich either abandon employment expansion plans or close up and retire. That reduced productivity will reduce demand for the dollar. To understand monetary inflation, you have to see both sides of the equation: supply AND demand.
Not really. Taxes take money out of ciculation causing fewer dollars to chase goods and lower inflation.

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/04/051904.asp

"When inflation is too strong, the economy may need a slow down. In such a situation, a government can use fiscal policy to increase taxes in order to suck money out of the economy."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2009, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Not really. Taxes take money out of ciculation causing fewer dollars to chase goods and lower inflation.

What Is Fiscal Policy?

"When inflation is too strong, the economy may need a slow down. In such a situation, a government can use fiscal policy to increase taxes in order to suck money out of the economy."
Yes, the supply is decreased, but lower productivity caused by more taxation also reduces the demand for those dollars. That's what I'm saying: some of the deflationists only concentrate on supply and not demand. If 25% of money is dropped from circulation, but demand for those dollars drops 50% due to reduced productivity and well because it's just worthless paper, how much are those dollars worth?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevemorse View Post
Explain the process of what happens? I am reading some posts and would like to know what exactly happens to the economy? What can one do to protect themself? Some say eventually riots in the streets is this over the top?

Where are we headed?

Thank You,

Marilyn
It depends. If you print a million dollars, and loan it to a bank, and when then bank pays it back, the Fed eliminates it, then nothing will happen. But if it is not withdrawn, then it will inflate themoney supply. We have been printing like crazy since the 1970s, and inflation is thousanfold because the money was not drawn back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Yes, the supply is decreased, but lower productivity caused by more taxation also reduces the demand for those dollars. That's what I'm saying: some of the deflationists only concentrate on supply and not demand. If 25% of money is dropped from circulation, but demand for those dollars drops 50% due to reduced productivity and well because it's just worthless paper, how much are those dollars worth?

No is is money in circulation is by far the the greatest cause not the demand for dollars for inflation. Please back up your assertion with any evidence. I think it would be difficult since none exists.

Last edited by shorebaby; 11-01-2009 at 06:37 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
No is is money in circulation is by far the the greatest cause not the demand for dollars for inflation. Please back up your assertion with any evidence. I think it would be difficult since none exists.
Allow me to use an example to illustrate my point. Let's assume that buggy whips are a form of currency and we're in the late 1800's. When the car was invented, buggy whips immediately lost much of its value due to the reduced need of horses for transportation. Even though buggy whips were being destroyed due to their reduced need, their intrinsic value still became relatively worthless (except as a collector's item in extremely limited numbers). Now let's take my example and apply it towards dollars. As the dollar is dumped as an exchange for oil around the world, its value will necessarily decline even if taxes are increased and fewer are left in circulation. Yes, you are partially correct in that supply of dollars necessarily creates inflation. However, the same is true for demand destruction. But, it's undetermined which has the greater impact and neither you nor I have evidence to suggest that either the supply increase or demand decrease will be the deciding factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 07:28 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJoey View Post
How much more money are we printing now compared to 5 years ago?

And just to clarify, the printing machine started in 2008..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 07:33 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
It depends. If you print a million dollars, and loan it to a bank, and when then bank pays it back, the Fed eliminates it, then nothing will happen. But if it is not withdrawn, then it will inflate themoney supply. We have been printing like crazy since the 1970s, and inflation is thousanfold because the money was not drawn back.
Wow, you have something correct.

Indeed thats what is currently going on. The fed is printing TONS of money and loaning it to the banks which they sit on, which results in no inflation. (which is why we havent seen any).

If/when the banks pay it back it simply removes money from money supply that wasnt available to the consumer to begin with.

If/when the banks begin to loan it back out then indeed inflation is the outcome because money is to "easy" to obtain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Allow me to use an example to illustrate my point. Let's assume that buggy whips are a form of currency and we're in the late 1800's. When the car was invented, buggy whips immediately lost much of its value due to the reduced need of horses for transportation. Even though buggy whips were being destroyed due to their reduced need, their intrinsic value still became relatively worthless (except as a collector's item in extremely limited numbers). Now let's take my example and apply it towards dollars. As the dollar is dumped as an exchange for oil around the world, its value will necessarily decline even if taxes are increased and fewer are left in circulation. Yes, you are partially correct in that supply of dollars necessarily creates inflation. However, the same is true for demand destruction. But, it's undetermined which has the greater impact and neither you nor I have evidence to suggest that either the supply increase or demand decrease will be the deciding factor.

The dollar is and for as long as China is swimming in dollars the dominant currency in the world and your thesis has no relevence in this inflation discussion. By the way every economist talk about increase in dollars in circulation as a threat to the economy, not the fall of the dollar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Wow, you have something correct.

Indeed thats what is currently going on. The fed is printing TONS of money and loaning it to the banks which they sit on, which results in no inflation. (which is why we havent seen any).

If/when the banks pay it back it simply removes money from money supply that wasnt available to the consumer to begin with.

If/when the banks begin to loan it back out then indeed inflation is the outcome because money is to "easy" to obtain.
Well, a lot of the banks have already paid back the money, so the question is what happens to the money now. If is eliminated, or is it added to the circulation.

Yes, I know I am correct. Perhaps one day you will be correct about something too.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/95/Components_of_the_United_States_money_supply2.svg/620px-Components_of_the_United_States_money_supply2.svg. png (broken link)

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 11-01-2009 at 08:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2009, 08:04 AM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,742,907 times
Reputation: 1336
A small group of "legal" private counterfeiters were put into business by "our" government in 1913.

Original dollar = 1/20 oz. gold.
Current dollar = 1/1044 oz. gold

Apart from everything else that can be discussed about counterfeiting currency, it is the private monopoly over "our" currency that has destroyed the value of the dollar more than anything else. Where did that value go? Primarily into the pockets of those who own the "Federal Reserve".

The simplest analogy would be something like this:

There are 100 dollars total in the economy valued at two eggs each.

The Morgan Reserve counterfeits an additional 100 dollars.

Now all dollars are worth just one egg each.

So half of the wealth of everyone holding the original dollars has just been cut in half and transfered to those holding the "new" dollars.

A drastic real example was the "bailout" of the banks.

The Morgans counterfeited nearly a trillion dollars. (Essentially taking a trillion dollars from the people indirectly.)
The Morgans gave these counterfeits to themselves and their friends.
The Morgans sent the people a bill for a "debt" for their counterfeiting service.
The Morgans collect "interest" on this "debt" for their counterfeiting service.

Soooo...when the Morgans, uh the "Federal Reserve", counterfeit currency they are actually just charging you for being mugged by them. Simplest terms.

Counterfeit (Steal)
"Donate" the plunder to themselves and friends. (Wallow in the stolen wealth.)
Bill everyone else for the "loan". (Steal again)
Charge everyone else interest on the "debt". (Steal yet again)

Welcome to the Morgan Plantation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top