Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"....So while it pays to be vigilant about threats to U.S. sovereignty, this one is not the threat that Monckton's rhetoric suggests. So Lord Monckton earns a special ruling — Britches on Fire!"
Do you not know that the only thing about this treaty that The Obama is prepared to sign is to give governmental control to the UN or the government they set up from this treaty? Of course, it would take 67 votes in the Senate to ratify the treaty but the others involved don't really understand that. They think that Obama has the power to give our sovereignty away and signing that thing will amount to that since that international body can force us to cut our use of "bad" fuels while allowing China and India to continue what they are doing.
Gore won't debate Monckton because he knows his knowledge, or lack of it, would become so apparent and then too many people would back off from this subject.
"....So while it pays to be vigilant about threats to U.S. sovereignty, this one is not the threat that Monckton's rhetoric suggests. So Lord Monckton earns a special ruling — Britches on Fire!"
LOL I didn't see the 'r' in the Britches on Fire part at first glance!
Did someone tell you two cry babies you had to open the threads you don't like?
Oh, fascists only may post? Nope, sorry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
I see lots more mention of the Algore than about Lord Monckton. In fact the only mention of Monckton I saw came from the video.
See the Politifact link above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
It is past time to force Algore to debate someone publicly to prove that his science is as settled as he says it is. Talking with his buddies always makes him look good and talking with others makes him look bad.
Do you not know that the only thing about this treaty that The Obama is prepared to sign is to give governmental control to the UN or the government they set up from this treaty? Of course, it would take 67 votes in the Senate to ratify the treaty but the others involved don't really understand that. They think that Obama has the power to give our sovereignty away and signing that thing will amount to that since that international body can force us to cut our use of "bad" fuels while allowing China and India to continue what they are doing.
Gore won't debate Monckton because he knows his knowledge, or lack of it, would become so apparent and then too many people would back off from this subject.
Oh, is that why?
Dont argue with me, argue with the facts in the Politifact link.
If you aren't a liberal Monckton is right on and if you are Algore is the man. That is all there is to this.
Oh how I wish it were so simple there, roysoldboy, but I've never been a fan of Al, I've never even seen an Inconvenient Truth and I still haven't ever forgiven his wifey Tipper for the whole music censorship (PMRC) back in the 80's, pal.
He ain't no scientist, just like fake lord Monckton....And I think this whole bizarre 'nemesis' thing is just funny as all hell!
Al Gore refuses to debate anybody. He's said the global climate change is a "closed science".
Nothing to debate, nothing left to discover. Nothing will evolve from his experts findings.
If that's Gore's position it just proves that he knows his position is indefensible.
Guess what?
He's a free citizen to do what he pleases.
He can or cannot debate anyone as he chooses.
Ain't America great?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.