Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
By those standards your party should think of him as a god. Those "scandals" are the status quo for the left and could possibly be endearing qualities that they'd look for in an ideal candidate.
Geithner (taxes), Obama (dead beat dad), Rangel (tax fraud), Edwards-Clinton (adultery) and well family values isn't one of them because the left despises family. Sounds like Newt is the perfect candidate for you...
By those standards your party should think of him as a god. Those "scandals" are the status quo for the left and could possibly be endearing qualities that they'd look for in an ideal candidate.
Geithner (taxes), Obama (dead beat dad), Rangel (tax fraud), Edwards-Clinton (adultery) and well family values isn't one of them because the left despises family. Sounds like Newt is the perfect candidate for you...
Yeah right. The Republicans with their broken health care system ruined millions of families over the years.
By those standards your party should think of him as a god. Those "scandals" are the status quo for the left and could possibly be endearing qualities that they'd look for in an ideal candidate.
Geithner (taxes), Obama (dead beat dad), Rangel (tax fraud), Edwards-Clinton (adultery) and well family values isn't one of them because the left despises family. Sounds like Newt is the perfect candidate for you...
Gingrich is all the goodies rolled into one. How does the "left" despise family values? What are family values to the right wingnuts anyway? With all the hypocrisy surrounding it, the party that has made it their own, seems to have made the term a meaningless one. The point is, that Gingrich should not throw stones as he certainly lives in a glass house.
Thank GOD for that! Gee, who would want the MIDDLE CLASS represeted at the White House?
You'd much prefer the Wall Streeter's are the only ones there, so they can discuss how many millions of their billions in bailouts should go to bonuses.
Rush Limbaugh makes hundreds of millions to convince sheeplike listeners to vote against their own economic livelihood. This can only be accomplished if the listener is not good at critical analysis of complex issues
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua
Two reasons he should go:
-It was the most significant event in our lifetimes in which freedom overcame tyranny and he is the leader of the free world.
-It is the most significant event in the life of one of our closest allies, a nation we have bases in btw.
It's laughable people trying to make a case the liberation of one relatively small city has such global signifigance when we continue to ally ourselves with and conduct massive $$$ amounts of trade with major abusers of human rights, China and Saudi Arabia being 2 ready examples, the tunnel vision of the American public is truly amazing.
It's laughable people trying to make a case the liberation of one relatively small city has such global signifigance when we continue to ally ourselves with and conduct massive $$$ amounts of trade with major abusers of human rights, China and Saudi Arabia being 2 ready examples, the tunnel vision of the American public is truly amazing.
No clue about history, have you? There was not just the Berlin wall. The wall also divided Germany and came down. Also, it was the end of the communism in Russia and all the countries Russia occupied were freed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.