Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-15-2009, 10:09 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

"Healthcare overhaul bills working their way through Congress could jeopardize laws in California and other states that require insurers to pay for treatments such as AIDS testing, second surgical opinions and reconstructive surgery for breast cancer patients.

What's more, the federal legislation could make it virtually impossible for states to enforce other consumer protection laws, such as the right to appeal if an insurer denies coverage for a particular treatment."


Healthcare bills could jeopardize states' consumer protection laws -- latimes.com

Republicans have touted their plan to allow insurance to be sold across state lines. I think it's important for people to realize that this will likely water down consumer protection laws to the lowest common denominator. I doubt most people in New York and California want the same level of protection that Texas gives to its residents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2009, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
We were discussing whether or not this healthcare bill was constitutional on another thread.

One bit though that jumped out at me while I was reading was the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

Congress can regulate and mandate laws over commerce with foreign nations, between states and American Indians.

Up til now, insurance was state regulated. With this national insurance pool though..that would cross state lines, wouldn't it ? If so, then that mean Congress and the Fed could take over and regulate it and mandate rules.

Rather than be subjected to the least common denominator of a state, we may get a whole new agency at the Fed level with a whole new set of rules. When has the government NOT jumped on an excuse to create more bureaucracy and red tape.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top