Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you try them in a military court you are giving them POW Status, that makes us guilty of mistreating POWs under International Law. We hung Japanese Interrogators for Waterboarding our flyers they captured
I think it's Democrats' personal vendetta against George W. Bush more than it is a vested interest in fairness and justice.
If GWB was a supporter, then Democrats' certainly can't be in support of it also. That's what's happening here. Military tribunals vs. District Court. Of course Democrats will go with District Court because GWB supported military trials. Nothing more, nothing less.
Why should there be a military trial? Were the perpetrators of 9/11 in an army from a country that we were officially at war with?
Why should there be a military trial? Were the perpetrators of 9/11 in an army from a country that we were officially at war with?
Of course you say that now, but if Obama and Democrats were pushing for military trials, I highly doubt you'd be asking why these guy's arent' being tried in Manhattan.
If you try them in a military court you are giving them POW Status, that makes us guilty of mistreating POWs under International Law. We hung Japanese Interrogators for Waterboarding our flyers they captured
They are NOT POW's and are not covered by the Geneva Convention rules.
They are terrorist and should not get any rights whatsoever under international laws.
Nice try to make an excuse for this huge mistake, but that is ok, the American people will see the clown act going on and know that it is Obama who was behind this all the way.
Obama and the dems will pay the price for this mistake.
And some idiots believe they should have been read miranda rights? You got to be kidding me, they have ZERO rights.
Of course you say that now, but if Obama and Democrats were pushing for military trials, I highly doubt you'd be asking why these guy's arent' being tried in Manhattan.
I would wonder why there would be military trials when the first WTC attackers were tried and sentenced in civilian courts the way these are going to be. Don't assume that you know what I would think in a given situation. Our thinking is not even remotely similar. Think and speak for yourself, thank you.
I think it's Democrats' personal vendetta against George W. Bush more than it is a vested interest in fairness and justice.
If GWB was a supporter, then Democrats' certainly can't be in support of it also. That's what's happening here. Military tribunals vs. District Court. Of course Democrats will go with District Court because GWB supported military trials. Nothing more, nothing less.
I think that our Supreme Court told Bush, while he was still IN office, that they were entitled to a trial under our legal system, based on American jurisprudence--not indefinite detention, not military tribunal.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do don't spend much time in court rooms, do you? But I do bet you may have watched some of those old Perry Mason re-runs! lol lol
