Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-24-2009, 07:05 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,476,088 times
Reputation: 4013

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber Queen View Post
Oh......My.....God!!!!! What is the difference how much? The topic was Tax dollars paying for the public option and you have it in pretty colors right in front of you how we will be paying for it. Yet you still can not admit it. Can we PLEASE get a banging head against wall icon!!!! PLEASE!!!
Actually, it makes a BIG difference how much it is, because if it is NONE (which happens to be the case), then FOX was lying...

...or if you want to grant them their cutesy little CYA's, then merely deliberately misleading the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2009, 07:17 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,476,088 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Making any progress on these brick walls?
From time to time. But it is like trying to take away a baby's security blanket. There is so much emotional investment that the nonsensical clingy thing may never actually be overcome. However, there is always the chance that others might be kept from falling into the same abyss...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 07:21 AM
 
Location: united states of america
240 posts, read 437,292 times
Reputation: 120
Default hmmmm

Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Fox Host: Public Option Would Be Tax-Payer Funded Government Health Care Program

"The reason that the public option is so controversial is, it's a government-run health option. So if you can't get health care anywhere else, this is the idea, that you could get it from this government-offered plan, which of course would be paid for by the taxpayers."

In reality, the public option would be available, as one option among many other private options, to people shopping in the health insurance exchange.

Fox Host: Public Option Would Be Tax-Payer Funded Government Health Care Program | TPMDC



those Fox always spoils the vine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
From time to time. But it is like trying to take away a baby's security blanket. There is so much emotional investment that the nonsensical clingy thing may never actually be overcome. However, there is always the chance that others might be kept from falling into the same abyss...
Keep at it, not for those that are blindly oblivious to facts, but those that are reading the posts and may get some recognition of the misinformation effect. You do appear to have a lot of patience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,483 posts, read 11,282,562 times
Reputation: 9002
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Fox Host: Public Option Would Be Tax-Payer Funded Government Health Care Program | TPMDC

While you are on the site, check out the part about Fox News!
And Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are simply two mortgage providers.

You people really have your blinders on don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 07:40 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
No, neither the CBO nor anyone else who knows what they are talking about (obviosuly FOX News is not among that group) has said that the Public Option will receive any support at all from taxpayers after the startup costs, because there is no provision in any bill for it but rather proscriptions against it.

HR 3200 - Sec 222(b)(2)(C):
LIMITATION ON FUNDING- Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing any additional appropriations to the [Public Option] Account, other than such amounts as are otherwise provided with respect to other Exchange-participating health benefits plans.

Can you read that? After the start-up costs, nothing may be appropriated into the public option except as appropriations may be made to all exchange participants. Too many big words again, or did it sink in this time?
Mind finding me the section in the senate bill that says the same, or are you taking part in your typical selective reading of bills?

edited: ooh wait, you are being dishonest again, section 222,b2c, deals with ONLY startup funding. Nothing appropriates anything other than $2Billion for a startup account.

Have something all of those additional taxes cant be used to fund healthcare, or do you think we are to stupid to be able to checkout the accuracy of your postings?

Last edited by pghquest; 11-24-2009 at 08:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:04 AM
 
921 posts, read 1,132,186 times
Reputation: 1599
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
After a rash of mistakes and apologies over the past weeks, Fox News has sent a memo to employees announcing a new "zero tolerance" policy for on-screen errors.

FishBowlDC obtained the memo, sent last Friday, which warns mistakes could lead to written warnings, suspensions and termination.

"Please know that jobs are on the line here. I can not stress that enough," the memo reads.

Fox News Threatens Pink Slips For On-Screen Errors | TPM LiveWire
If they really threatened pink slips for on-screen errors, then they would have to hire a whole new brodcast team on order to stay honest or just turn all of their station into an entertainment only network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:10 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,934,013 times
Reputation: 12828
Too bad we can't serve Obama up with a pink-slip for on-screen errors. Of course, any errors by Obama will always be assigned as TOTUS's fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:13 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,583,949 times
Reputation: 2606
Lightbulb FOX Caught Lying AGAIN

The term "again" Implies that they'd stopped lying at some point.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by imalert View Post
If they really threatened pink slips for on-screen errors, then they would have to hire a whole new brodcast team on order to stay honest or just turn all of their station into an entertainment only network.
You mean it's not just an entertainment only network now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top