Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nope. They are quotes made by his supporters and those whom he supports.
Sorry, you cant dodge this as an issue. Find me an example of any politician, dem or repub, accepting funds from and endorsing holocaust deniers, and I will call them the same.
Nope. They are quotes made by his supporters and those whom he supports.
Ron Paul does not support the personal agenda of his Supporters. You are making yourself look ridiculous. Glad you admitted Dr. Ron Paul did not make those remarks. I know no one that thinks Ron Paul denies the Holocaust - except maybe you
Is that really the determining factor when it comes to running the nation? Or even the local bridge club?? I think there are far more important issues to be concerned with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tindo80
Find me an example of any politician, dem or repub, accepting funds from and endorsing holocaust deniers, and I will call them the same.
Paul should not have agreed to be photographed with those wackjobs. Otherwise, Ron Paul is the voice in the wilderness! His window has closed to run in 2012. He's getting too old. But, others are out there who have similar views and in 12 they will come forth. If we make it that far. I think we will as the Bilderbergers have plans up their sleave yet.
Paul should not have agreed to be photographed with those wackjobs. Otherwise, Ron Paul is the voice in the wilderness! His window has closed to run in 2012. He's getting too old. But, others are out there who have similar views and in 12 they will come forth. If we make it that far. I think we will as the Bilderbergers have plans up their sleave yet.
I really get tired of people calling the Germans whackjobs. I would say they took a very practical scientific approach to the outcomes of humanity.
Intelligence is largely genetic, this is a fact that has been proven time and again through genetic research. The problem is, intelligence across racial groupings is usually represented by an average score, but averages generally mean there are people that are far above average and people far below average.
The problem with the Germans wasn't if they were right or wrong from a scientific point-of-view. The problem is in the lack of ethics and morality in their mission to make a more genetically superior world through basically selective human breeding.
Even if it could be proven that some racial groups ON AVERAGE have superior intelligence than others, it can still be argued that a notable percentage of the inferior group would still be more intelligent than the superior group.
The Germans weren't incorrect in their observations in the differences of human abilities caused by genetic differences. They were incorrect in being completely immoral through the extermination of who they considered inferiors.
Of course, you have to put what you consider inferiority into perspective. White men can't jump....
Genetically based, anatomical differences help explain why athletes of primarily West African ancestry hold 97 percent of top sprint times, including 494 of the top 500 100-meter times, yet are not very good at endurance sports, which requires a much different physiology.
The body type of whites falls in between West African descended and East African athletes. They have more natural upper-body strength, which contributes to their domination of weightlifting, field events such as the shot put and hammer (whites hold 46 of the top 50 throws), and the offensive line in football. Where flexibility is key, East Asians shine, such as in diving and some skating and gymnastic events -- hence the term "Chinese splits."
And obviously white men can't run either.
Last edited by Redshadowz; 12-07-2009 at 07:23 PM..
Your rants about why white men can't jump and German practical scientific approach have nothing to do with Ron Paul. To date, Ron Paul has no plans to run for President in 2012.
Ron Paul does not support the personal agenda of his Supporters. You are making yourself look ridiculous. Glad you admitted Dr. Ron Paul did not make those remarks. I know no one that thinks Ron Paul denies the Holocaust - except maybe you
Oh, did you ask about Ron Pauls anti Semetic and neo-nazi racist commentary?
Why We Should Support Ron Paul - Stormfront - Neo Nazi websights forum on why they should support Ron Paul .Many of you here (cough cough red cough cough) know this particular thread and forum well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poster from that site
And not standing up for Ron Paul against the un-American Jewish media and neo-cons who will do anything to stop his nomination is like not standing up to the efforts to force integration, to encourage mass non-White immigration, or to the attack on the USS Liberty.
Straight from the mouths of babes...
But Ok, lets ignore THAT as well as [b]his acceptance and endorsements of white supremacist terrorist organizations like the stormfront/neo nazi movement.
Your 'beg the question' argument isnt working here...
This “Special Issue on Racial Terrorism” was hardly the first time one of Paul’s publications had raised these topics. As early as December 1989, a section of his Investment Letter, titled “What To Expect for the 1990s,” predicted that “Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities” because “mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white ‘haves.’” Two months later, a newsletter warned of “The Coming Race War,” and, in November 1990, an item advised readers, “If you live in a major city, and can leave, do so. If not, but you can have a rural retreat, for investment and refuge, buy it.” In June 1991, an entry on racial disturbances in Washington, DC’s Adams Morgan neighborhood was titled, “Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo.” “This is only the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s,” the newsletter predicted. In an October 1992 item about urban crime, the newsletter’s author--presumably Paul--wrote, “I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.” That same year, a newsletter described the aftermath of a basketball game in which “blacks poured into the streets of Chicago in celebration. How to celebrate? How else? They broke the windows of stores to loot.” The newsletter inveighed against liberals who “want to keep white America from taking action against black crime and welfare,” adding, “Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems.”
Ron Paul on South Africa ending apartheid
Quote:
Such views on race also inflected the newsletters’ commentary on foreign affairs. South Africa’s transition to multiracial democracy was portrayed as a “destruction of civilization” that was “the most tragic [to] ever occur on that continent, at least below the Sahara”; and, in March 1994, a month before Nelson Mandela was elected president, one item warned of an impending “South African Holocaust.”
Ron Paul on Martin Luther King
Quote:
The same year, King was described as “a comsymp, if not an actual party member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.”
Ron Paul on Gay people
Quote:
“Homosexuals,” it said, “not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities.” When Marvin Liebman, a founder of the conservative Young Americans for Freedom and a longtime political activist, announced that he was gay in the pages of National Review, a Paul newsletter implored, “Bring Back the Closet!” Surprisingly, one item expressed ambivalence about the contentious issue of gays in the military, but ultimately concluded, “Homosexuals, if admitted, should be put in a special category and not allowed in close physical contact with heterosexuals.”
Ron Paul on AIDS victims
Quote:
, “The ACT-UP slogan, on stickers plastered all over Manhattan, is ‘Silence = Death.’ But shouldn’t it be ‘Sodomy = Death’?” Readers were warned to avoid blood transfusions because gays were trying to “poison the blood supply.”
Ron Paul on batcrap paranoia
Quote:
“You can’t kill a Hydra by cutting off its head,” “Keep the group size down,” “Keep quiet and you’re harder to find,” “Leave no clues,” “Avoid the phone as much as possible,” and “Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.”
And lastly, AGAIN, Ron Paul and his ACCEPTANCE AND ENDORSEMENT OF (see site above) HOLOCAUST DENIER, ANTI SEMITE NEO NAZI SUPPORTER DON BLACK
Quote:
There is more. The Texas-based Lone Star Times October 25 publicly requested a response to questions about whether the Paul campaign would repudiate and reject a $500 donation from white supremacist Stormfront.org founder Don Black and end the Stormfront website fundraising for Paul. The Times article lit up the conservative blogosphere for the next week. Paul supporters packed internet comment boards alternately denouncing or excusing the charges. Most politicians are quick to distance themselves from such disreputable donations when they are discovered. Not Paul.
Daniel Siederaski of the Jewish Telegraph Agency tried to get an interview with Paul, calling him repeatedly but not receiving any return calls. Wrote Siederaski November 9: "Ron Paul will take money from Nazis. But he won’t take telephone calls from Jews." [Update] Finally on November 13 the Paul campaign responded. In a short interview JTA quotes Jim Perry, head of Jews for Paul describing his work on the Paul campaign along side a self-described white supremacist which Perry says he has reformed.
...
Perhaps frustrated by the weasel words, Lone Star Times asked Benton: "Bottom line- Will the Ron Paul campaign be rejecting the $500 contribution made by neo-Nazi Don Black?"
Benton's response: "At this time, I cannot say that we will be rejecting Mr. Black's contribution, but I will bring the matter to the attention of our campaign director again, and expect some sort of decision to be made in coming days."
On October 11 Stormfront Radio endorsed Ron Paul for President saying:
"Whatever organization you belong to, remember first and foremost that you're a white nationalist, then put aside your differences with one another and work together. Work together to strive to get someone in the Oval Office who agrees with much of what we want for our future. Look at the man, look at the issues, look at our future. Vote for Ron Paul, 2008."
(Ron Paul and vehement supporter/Active Neo Nazi and Holocaust denier Don Black)
Again, YOU CANT HIDE FROM THE OBVIOUS.
If he were standing next to hitler, accepting nazi german money and openly espousing nazi racist propaganda, would your argument still be 'Well, hes different than his supporters"
(Well, some 'fronters' around would actually salute him for that)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
