Reagan Vs. Obama First Term Polls. (legal, weapon, economy, states)

[nononsenseguy]

Originally Posted by ovcatto

Funny, you can draw them a picture and they still don't get it!

No, YOU don't "get it"! You're still trying to compare Obama to Ronald Reagan!

[nononsenseguy]

Originally Posted by Bosco55David

Because there is no scandal, despite what you'd like to believe.

No scandal? Please. The evidence is irrefutable. They lied. They manipulated (or hid) data to support their theory, in order to advance an a globalist agenda.

This is a huge scandal.

When liberals lie, it's ignored and even covered up. When anyone else lies, it's a scandal, and something that gets a huge amount of press coverage (especially if the liar is a Republican).

[saganista]

Campaign 2010 -- Party of No Preview...

Interviewer: Do you support any of President Obama's initiatives?
Republican: No.
Interviewer: Do you have any actual idea of what to do differently?
Republican: No.

I wonder if it's possible for Republicans to buck history and actually LOSE seats...

[nononsenseguy]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

He is a record setter for sure.

He has set so many records in his first year we won't be able to keep track of them all.

And wait until these numbers drop to the low 40's in the next few months, his followers will be going nuts trying to find out who to blame.

And probably still trying to compare him to Reagan!

[saganista]

Originally Posted by nononsenseguy

No scandal? Please. The evidence is irrefutable. They lied. They manipulated (or hid) data to support their theory, in order to advance an a globalist agenda. This is a huge scandal.

I'm sure this is in all the headlines on your planet. Not so much here on Earth. The CRU papers in our world don't show anything at all. Blog science is still taking the usual beating from real science. Except at the occasional Tea Party, of course...

[burdell]

Originally Posted by nononsenseguy

No scandal? Please. The evidence is irrefutable. They lied. They manipulated (or hid) data to support their theory, in order to advance an a globalist agenda.

This is a huge scandal.

You're of course talking about the illegal weapons sales to an enemy state, and the ensuing cover-up and excuse making, right?

[LexusNexus]

Different times, different values, different problems. Obama followed the worst administration in history and has to deal with the worst problems as well. Far more complex world now. Information much more readily available now with media influence far more prevalent. I could go on, but a comparison of this sort is absolutely meaningless.

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by burdell

To quote one of your heroes, Cheney, about public opinion polls: "SO ?"

And there's this one from Cheney:

"You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter"

Dick Cheney on Budget & Economy

Funny how NOW suddenly they DO.


The truth is, they have ALWAYS mattered, but sometimes OTHER things matter more (at least in the short run).

Ken

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by nononsenseguy

Obama is no Ronald Reagan, and Reagan didn't destroy the economy, he saved it from the destruction of Jimmy Carter.

As Obama is saving it from GW.

House prices have more or less stablized (still falling slightly in some parts of the country, growing in others but overall pretty stable).

The banks are (for the most part) stable and reporting profits and paying back the government TARP.

The jobs cuts are ending (after going on for 2 years straight) and hiring set to resume in the spring.

Cars are selling again with sales UP from this time last year.

The stock markets are UP from where they were when Obama was elected after one of the most dramatic rises in history.

That's MY kind of "destroying the economy".



Ken

[nononsenseguy]

Originally Posted by saganista

I'm sure this is in all the headlines on your planet. Not so much here on Earth. The CRU papers in our world don't show anything at all. Blog science is still taking the usual beating from real science. Except at the occasional Tea Party, of course...

Deny, deny, deny. It's because you people know it's a lie, and refuse to admit it. It always has been known to be a lie; now we have the hard evidence in these so-called "scientists" own emails to one another.

I couldn't care less if the news outlets you look at aren't reporting it. That's their problem. The news is out there, and we all know the truth.

Here's an interesting link for ya:

East Anglia Confirmed Emails from the Climate Research Unit - Searchable (http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=295&filename=1047388489.txt - broken link)

And another:

Willis vs. The CRU: A History of (FOI) Evasion « The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE (http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/willis-vs-the-cru-a-history-of-foi-evasion/ - broken link)

And yet another:

Climate Feedback: CRU data hack


You see, the so-called "Climate change" theory doesn't stand up to scrutiny. There has been no Peer Review, because they have not allowed it, nor have they allowed publication of other critical papers.

Basically all these "scientists" have "agreed to agree", and to hide all inconsistant data from others.

And just to stay on topic, Obam is still going to Copenhagen despite the truth having been exposed, because he is part of the Globalist community.

He's no Ronald Wilson Reagan!! He's nothing but a moron!