Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then go ahead and back it up with facts that it didn't happen. Come on big guy, show us what you're made of, or lack thereof.
Media Matters has several cited articles and research on this (which happened 9 years ago). Or have you just ignored the multiple posts with that information?
Media Matters has several cited articles and research on this (which happened 9 years ago). Or have you just ignored the multiple posts with that informatin?
I ignored that biased crap, like you are with the other 2 sites that were mentioned. So, here we are 2 sites say it did happen and 1 that says it didn't. It's 2-1 so the consensus is it DID happen.
What about Brietbart? Are they a credible news source??? Oh yeah, I forgot, anyone who reports anything negative on this administration must be ridiculed and marginalized.....
The left wingers and the gay organizations don't want people to know of the dangerous degeneracy they are promoting to children in the schools. These people should not be arond ANY children!
Then go ahead and back it up with facts that it didn't happen. Come on big guy, show us what you're made of, or lack thereof.
Logically, you cannot prove a negative. You cannot PROVE that something did not happen, you can only prove that something did happen.
As for this story, all you had to do was some very basic research. For instance, some research would have told you that a judge in Massachusetts had determined that the recording, of one of fifty work sessions, was actually a recording of one of the sessions, where participants were promised that they could ask questions in a safe and non-judgmental environment. It also was evidence of illegal activity. Not on the part of GLSEN, but on the part of Mass Resistance. Because it is illegal in Massachusetts, as it is in many other states, to record meetings and conversations without the consent of the participants. Mass Resistance can say they did so to protect children, but they weren't all that interested in protecting children when they released the tapes publicly, when the participants, including the children, had sued to stop them from doing so, and when the courts ordered them not to release the tapes. Mass Resistance didn't care about the harm they did to the people they recorded, including children, did they?
I ignored that biased crap, like you are with the other 2 sites that were mentioned. So, here we are 2 sites say it did happen and 1 that says it didn't. It's 2-1 so the consensus is it DID happen.
So Media Matters is biased and doesn't count, but WND isn't? You're contradicting yourself here, you attack other posters for not reading the WND article because they are biased, but will not read the Media Matters article? I read both and the WND article is full of speculation and twisting of events.
The Media Matters site's article is fully cited with AP and Boston Globe articles reporting on EXACTLY what happened back in 2000.
WND does not have that. WND simply rehashes what was posted on Gateway Pundit. Just because blogs repeat the same stories does not make the stories accurate.
Do you just want to believe WND or do you want to know the truth? If you want to know the truth, I suggest you check out that Media Matters article along with their cited articles from back in 2000.
If you just want to pull the wool over your eyes and believe whatever you hear, I suggest you just believe everything that WND spoon feeds to you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.