Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:10 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,663,385 times
Reputation: 2829

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertGibbs View Post
Read the article, it might tell you.
It wasn't Jennings speaking on the recording.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:11 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
1,878 posts, read 2,064,338 times
Reputation: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtoli View Post
It wasn't Jennings speaking on the recording.
It was one of his group's members. It's his baby, he promoted this stuff to be talked about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:12 PM
 
10,793 posts, read 13,545,862 times
Reputation: 6189
Is this true???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:12 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,663,385 times
Reputation: 2829
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertGibbs View Post
Then go ahead and back it up with facts that it didn't happen. Come on big guy, show us what you're made of, or lack thereof.
Media Matters has several cited articles and research on this (which happened 9 years ago). Or have you just ignored the multiple posts with that information?

Is Catcher in the Rye child porn literature?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:14 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
1,878 posts, read 2,064,338 times
Reputation: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtoli View Post
Media Matters has several cited articles and research on this (which happened 9 years ago). Or have you just ignored the multiple posts with that informatin?
I ignored that biased crap, like you are with the other 2 sites that were mentioned. So, here we are 2 sites say it did happen and 1 that says it didn't. It's 2-1 so the consensus is it DID happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:15 PM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,088,985 times
Reputation: 2863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Sniper View Post
What about Brietbart? Are they a credible news source??? Oh yeah, I forgot, anyone who reports anything negative on this administration must be ridiculed and marginalized.....


Big Government » Blog Archive » Fistgate: Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s 2000 Conference Promoted ‘Fisting’ to 14 Year-Olds

The left wingers and the gay organizations don't want people to know of the dangerous degeneracy they are promoting to children in the schools. These people should not be arond ANY children!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:17 PM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,088,985 times
Reputation: 2863
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Yeah I listened to that audio clip about fisting, where's the proof it comes from GLSEN? Maybe I'm just not as gullible as you are....

There was a court case over this dispicable event sponsered by GLSEN who are pure scum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:18 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertGibbs View Post
Then go ahead and back it up with facts that it didn't happen. Come on big guy, show us what you're made of, or lack thereof.
Logically, you cannot prove a negative. You cannot PROVE that something did not happen, you can only prove that something did happen.

As for this story, all you had to do was some very basic research. For instance, some research would have told you that a judge in Massachusetts had determined that the recording, of one of fifty work sessions, was actually a recording of one of the sessions, where participants were promised that they could ask questions in a safe and non-judgmental environment. It also was evidence of illegal activity. Not on the part of GLSEN, but on the part of Mass Resistance. Because it is illegal in Massachusetts, as it is in many other states, to record meetings and conversations without the consent of the participants. Mass Resistance can say they did so to protect children, but they weren't all that interested in protecting children when they released the tapes publicly, when the participants, including the children, had sued to stop them from doing so, and when the courts ordered them not to release the tapes. Mass Resistance didn't care about the harm they did to the people they recorded, including children, did they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Tampa (by way of Omaha)
14,561 posts, read 23,067,590 times
Reputation: 10356
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertGibbs View Post
Then go ahead and back it up with facts that it didn't happen. Come on big guy, show us what you're made of, or lack thereof.
So you want to play that game? Ok, I hear you like to molest small children.

Prove it's not true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2009, 12:19 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,663,385 times
Reputation: 2829
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertGibbs View Post
I ignored that biased crap, like you are with the other 2 sites that were mentioned. So, here we are 2 sites say it did happen and 1 that says it didn't. It's 2-1 so the consensus is it DID happen.
So Media Matters is biased and doesn't count, but WND isn't? You're contradicting yourself here, you attack other posters for not reading the WND article because they are biased, but will not read the Media Matters article? I read both and the WND article is full of speculation and twisting of events.

The Media Matters site's article is fully cited with AP and Boston Globe articles reporting on EXACTLY what happened back in 2000.

WND does not have that. WND simply rehashes what was posted on Gateway Pundit. Just because blogs repeat the same stories does not make the stories accurate.

Do you just want to believe WND or do you want to know the truth? If you want to know the truth, I suggest you check out that Media Matters article along with their cited articles from back in 2000.

If you just want to pull the wool over your eyes and believe whatever you hear, I suggest you just believe everything that WND spoon feeds to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top