Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And you still use a racist term for Obama...that makes you a ...???
That didn't take long - the playing of the race card. Fortunately, you've used it so often that it no longer has the impact it once had. Congratulate yourself.
""""Originally Posted by sanrene
There are a variety of sources, including the NYT, the WaPo and other left-wing rags. Are those the only stories you remember?""""
"""So basically, you're just regurgitating information? A blogger for the WaPo? Come on sag, you can back up your claims better than that, can't you?"""
""""It is NOT surprising that ABC/WaPo would put a poll out like this. Unfortunately for them, the huge gap in party affiliation raises questions about bias and objectivity.""""
Is this supposed to make a point having to do with this thread?
I see no relevance at all...please point what you were attempting to reference.
Sullivan has not been a "conservative" for years, if he ever was one.
See, having somebody like Sully pretending to be conservative is just another deceitful tactic from the Left - he is their go-to guy when they want to bash republicans/conservatives and then they have the "cover" narrative - "Oh, this means something, cause he's a conservative and his point is relevant".
It's all just another well-worn page from the Liberal playbook.
Sully is still obsessed with the notion that Trig is not hers - how much more deranged can he get?
His book speaks for itself.
And, sorry, you are confusing him with Patrick Buchanan, the real 'go-to' guy for all things 'conservative.'
If word count and frequency of mention is the only criterion for determining obsession, I would have to say that you are obsessed with liberals.
Actually, yes, both Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Ambinder have done exactly the same sort of examination of the President's speeches, most recently the speech given at West Point.
Good that the WaPo got her on record, they can clobber her with her own words later down the road. Not that she wrote this execrable hack job, it was no doubt written for her by her handlers at the ADF, who take order from Dobson, who she'll suck up to while in town today for her phony book signing.
My first reaction after reading the piece was, who wrote this?
But then I read it again, and found several sentences that convinced me that Palin wrote it herself.
The agenda-driven policies being pushed in Copenhagen won't change the weather, but they would change our economy for the worse.
But while we recognize the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can't say with assurance that man's activities cause weather changes.
Weather! No, no, no - weather is weather, and climate is climate, and the two are NOT the same.
But this was the kicker:
I saw the impact of changing weather patterns firsthand while serving as governor of our only Arctic state.
Gotta ask ... did she see it from her house? Were those "changing weather patterns" coming from Russia?
That didn't take long - the playing of the race card. Fortunately, you've used it so often that it no longer has the impact it once had. Congratulate yourself.
Oh, what's the "new" racist term from the Left?
Oh, that started with the OP referring to Obama as the man/child....the right's not-so-secret word for "boy". The explanation was on the first two pages of YOUR thread...which, of course, you pretended not to see.
Fortunately, you've used it so often that it no longer has the impact it never had.
The Obama administration is warning Congress that if it doesn't move to regulate greenhouse gases, the Environmental Protection Agency will take a "command-and-control" role over the process in a way that could hurt business.
In essence, what they are saying is that the former Vice-Presidential candidate, Governor of Alaska, chair of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, chair of the National Governors Association (NGA) Natural Resources Committee, and head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, doesn't have the right to publish an op-ed on energy related public policy.
The only justification for such an absurd claim is that they are scared to death of how effectively she has lead the opposition to Obama and his plans.
I wonder if the Left realizes how absurd and ridiculous they sound.
The people who are (or should be) scared to death of Sarah Palin are the Republicans. She's doing everything in her power to rip your party apart at the already pulling seams.
And you can mark my words, if Mrs. Palin thought she got roughed up by the media and the Democrats in this last election, she's in for a very rude awakening if she dares try to join the primary race against other Republicans. Think of it like an old-fashioned shredder versus a modern one. The Democrats put her through a straight-cut shredder, where at the end of the day, she could at least still match up all the shreds and put the pieces back together again. The Republicans will put her through a cross-cut shredder and she'll be confetti.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
