Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2009, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Austin
1,476 posts, read 1,775,094 times
Reputation: 435

Advertisements

Quote:
WASHINGTON -- Less than a year after Inauguration Day, support for the Democratic Party continues to slump, amid a difficult economy and a wave of public discontent, according to a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.
Source: Democrats' Blues Grow Deeper in New Poll - WSJ.com

Hopefully this will lead to increased 3rd party membership. Independents like myself are getting tired of not having a voice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2009, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, IN
839 posts, read 982,162 times
Reputation: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejitsu View Post
Source: Democrats' Blues Grow Deeper in New Poll - WSJ.com

Hopefully this will lead to increased 3rd party membership. Independents like myself are getting tired of not having a voice.
How many times do I have to address this in this forum!? There will never be a viable third party in the US because of the particular structure of our federal electoral system. One of the closest things in political science to a 'natural law of politics' is Duverger's Law which holds that any electoral system which combines single-member districts with first-past-the-post elections will inevitably lead to a stable two-party system, period. In order to create a real multi-party system we'd have to either have run-off elections or, more preferably, multi-member districts. Even better, we'd need both! This law does a great job of explaining why some democracies find themselves having a two party system, why some have a multi-party system with three to five viable parties and why some have multi-party systems with lots of viable parties. The structure of the electoral system is determinative in this regard. Unfortunately, the only way to change the electoral system would require overwhelming support from Republicans and Democrats who hold elected office, the very people who benefit from the current system. That'll never happen so we'll never have a viable third party no matter how much you wish we did. From time to time a third party might get one person into office briefly, but thats about it and that is typically a result of that persons personality rather than their party affiliation. This debate is pointless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 03:52 PM
 
Location: In the Axis of Time
164 posts, read 298,321 times
Reputation: 142
Their polititians. Of course their support is dropping. I, so many problems
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 04:11 PM
 
15,446 posts, read 21,341,511 times
Reputation: 28701
Unless you want to continue to lose everything you believe in elections, the best thing to do is decide is which of the two political parties you hate the most and vote for the other one. In the clearest sense, voting for a third party is a vote for the party you hate the most. The party who will win in the next election, will be the party that learns this lesson best.

The other lesson here is that no amount of discussing this matter in an anonymous political forum makes any difference. People will vote the way they want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:01 PM
 
1,700 posts, read 3,423,174 times
Reputation: 603
Nowhere in that article does it say that Republicans are LOSING support. Nowhere. Another Joejitsu special.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:13 PM
 
952 posts, read 942,121 times
Reputation: 612




The Donkey Party is in charge.....and don't you forget it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:22 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,776,564 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ever Adrift View Post
How many times do I have to address this in this forum!? There will never be a viable third party in the US because of the particular structure of our federal electoral system. One of the closest things in political science to a 'natural law of politics' is Duverger's Law which holds that any electoral system which combines single-member districts with first-past-the-post elections will inevitably lead to a stable two-party system, period. In order to create a real multi-party system we'd have to either have run-off elections or, more preferably, multi-member districts. Even better, we'd need both! This law does a great job of explaining why some democracies find themselves having a two party system, why some have a multi-party system with three to five viable parties and why some have multi-party systems with lots of viable parties. The structure of the electoral system is determinative in this regard. Unfortunately, the only way to change the electoral system would require overwhelming support from Republicans and Democrats who hold elected office, the very people who benefit from the current system. That'll never happen so we'll never have a viable third party no matter how much you wish we did. From time to time a third party might get one person into office briefly, but thats about it and that is typically a result of that persons personality rather than their party affiliation. This debate is pointless.
I disagree. I think enough signatures from ordinary citizens, the 2 party system can be reformed despite them handling such a bill. A proposal on the ballot in every state of the union 3rd party could potentially get an even shot for a change. You've got to want it bad enough and haven't the past 10 yrs alone been enough evidence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:27 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,776,564 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaluce View Post



The Donkey Party is in charge.....and don't you forget it!
Is it better than denying there's an elephant in the room?

Weird how dems call themselves blue dog, yellow dog, cujo. Switch over genus species from equus asinus... can't blame them really.

Third parties could be a herd of spitting llamas. hahahahaa
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
4,002 posts, read 3,903,605 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ever Adrift View Post
How many times do I have to address this in this forum!? There will never be a viable third party in the US because of the particular structure of our federal electoral system. One of the closest things in political science to a 'natural law of politics' is Duverger's Law which holds that any electoral system which combines single-member districts with first-past-the-post elections will inevitably lead to a stable two-party system, period. In order to create a real multi-party system we'd have to either have run-off elections or, more preferably, multi-member districts. Even better, we'd need both! This law does a great job of explaining why some democracies find themselves having a two party system, why some have a multi-party system with three to five viable parties and why some have multi-party systems with lots of viable parties. The structure of the electoral system is determinative in this regard. Unfortunately, the only way to change the electoral system would require overwhelming support from Republicans and Democrats who hold elected office, the very people who benefit from the current system. That'll never happen so we'll never have a viable third party no matter how much you wish we did. From time to time a third party might get one person into office briefly, but thats about it and that is typically a result of that persons personality rather than their party affiliation. This debate is pointless.
Sure .. the debate is only pointless until the Congress is filled with 3rd party representatives ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 06:50 PM
 
519 posts, read 688,428 times
Reputation: 153
Democrats have plenty more to lose than Republicans. Too bad the Left doesn't have the structural integrity to get out the vote in an off-year election....an election that they will need as much momentum as they can get. The first black President is in office, so it's back to the Couch Of Apathy for most of the 2008 Democratic voters in 2010.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top