Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2010, 05:13 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,856,305 times
Reputation: 10371

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by lipschitz
Obama's out of control spending and giving billions to Wall St frauds is making another bubble, is all. Watch it all come crashing down again in 2010.
Good luck with that.

Ken
I agree about the malinvestment. Not as bad as the 1937 to 1938 dip but it will be bad.

1935-April 109 low point dow climbs from here
1936-April 146
1937-April 174
1938-April 112 march was the low point
1939-April 128
1940-April 148


1935 - 20.1 percent high point
1936 - 16.9 percent
1937 - 14.3 percent
1938 - 19.0 percent
1939 - 17.2 percent
1940 - 14.6 percent

I wonder if FDR had a made up chart about how unemployment is better off with a recovery act.

I guess in the late 30's there was no lag between unemployment and the dow
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2010, 05:14 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,910,188 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I think you may need to go back to school. Or, if your in school, start paying attention.
how is that an actual response to a question? i don't see an answer to the question in there at all.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 05:20 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,856,305 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I think you may need to go back to school. Or, if your in school, start paying attention.

lmao Maybe YOU should have payed attention in school.
It's you're, not your.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 06:42 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,323,407 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
I agree about the malinvestment. Not as bad as the 1937 to 1938 dip but it will be bad.

1935-April 109 low point dow climbs from here
1936-April 146
1937-April 174
1938-April 112 march was the low point
1939-April 128
1940-April 148


1935 - 20.1 percent high point
1936 - 16.9 percent
1937 - 14.3 percent
1938 - 19.0 percent
1939 - 17.2 percent
1940 - 14.6 percent

I wonder if FDR had a made up chart about how unemployment is better off with a recovery act.

I guess in the late 30's there was no lag between unemployment and the dow
You know, I see the Wingnuts use the fact that 1938 fell back into recession (and the market retreated) as "proof" that the New Deal didn't work and can't help but laugh at their ignorance and/or their gall.

You are aware aren't you that the REASON 1938 had such bad numbers is not BECAUSE of the New Deal policies but BECAUSE in 1937 FDR - who was under increasing pressure from Republicans (and members of his own cadre of advisers who shared opinions with the GOP) to cut back on the New Deal because of their concern about the deficit (any of that sound at all familiar) - reversed his New Deal policies prematurely (cutting and canceling various stimulus type programs). The result was that (as might be predicted) the economy fell back in recession - with both the stock market AND unemployment giving up the hard-fought gains FDR had achieved over 1936 and 1937.

Wingnuts then have the gall use the fact that 1938 showed little improvement over 1935 as "proof" the New Deal didn't work - conveniently overlooking the fact that 1936 & 1937 showed lots of improvement (both for the stock market and for unemployment) - and that the reversal in 1938 was NOT due to the FDR's New Deal policies but rather reflected the fact that action was taken in late 1937 to REVERSE those policies and institute policies more focused on deficit reduction that were more palatable to the GOP.

Prior to FDR reversing course and caving in to the GOP the markets were rising and unemployment was falling. When he changed course and agreed to do as the GOP wanted and focus on the deficit instead of the economy then BOTH the stock market and the unemployment rate reflected a turn for the worst.

The fact is, FDR's original policies had be working JUST FINE prior to him reversing course in 1937 - with the markets recovering and unemployment dropping 5 percentage points in just 2 years (that's a HUGE drop).

"By the spring of 1937, economic indicators had regained the production, profits, and wage levels of 1929, except for unemployment, which remained high, although it was considerably lower than the 25% unemployment rate seen in 1933. In June 1937 some of Roosevelt's advisors urged spending cuts to balance the budget. WPA rolls were drastically cut and PWA projects were slowed to a standstill.[4] The American economy took a sharp downturn in mid-1937, lasting for 13 months through most of 1938. Industrial production declined almost 30 per cent and production of durable goods fell even faster.

Unemployment jumped from 14.3% in 1937 to 19.0% in 1938, rising from 5 million to more than 12 million in early 1938.[5] Manufacturing output fell by 37% from the 1937 peak and was back to 1934 levels.[6] Producers reduced their expenditures on durable goods, and inventories declined, but personal income was only 15% lower than it had been at the peak in 1937. In most sectors, hourly earnings continued to rise throughout the recession, which partly compensated for the reduction in the number of hours worked. As unemployment rose, consumers' expenditures declined, leading to further cutbacks in production."


Recession of 1937–1938 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Timeline of the Great Depression

It was not the New Deal policies that caused the recession of 1938 but rather the REVERSAL of those policies. Changing his focus from the economy to the deficit was the worst decision FDR ever made. There are times to focus on the deficit and there are times to IGNORE the deficit and focus on the economy. Right NOW - as in 1937 - is NOT the time to worry about the deficit, it's time to worry about the ECONOMY. The deficit can be dealt with LATER - once the economic crises has passed.

Ken

Last edited by LordBalfor; 01-01-2010 at 07:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,608,156 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feel The Love View Post
I made a killing this year, while I watched all the Beck types run out and buy gold at the top of the market. Way to go yahoos.
I also had my best year ever, and a lot of the gains are yet to come because some sectors like real estate stocks haven't even rebounded yet. They were cheaper than dirt back in Feb, March when I bought some.

Happy new year all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,850,288 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
lmao Maybe YOU should have payed attention in school.
It's you're, not your.
Your absolutely correct, I am glad you're paying attention, now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 07:49 AM
 
1,535 posts, read 1,633,535 times
Reputation: 385

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE0IAhjEstk

Here is how the Dow Jones faired compared to real goods, cost of milk, gold, wheat, 2 minute video gives the real numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 07:50 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
4,085 posts, read 8,784,782 times
Reputation: 2691
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
After an absolutely HORRIBLE 2008, stocks saw terrific gains in 2009 - this in SPITE of claims by the Obamabashers that if Obama was elected the stock market would crash. From their March lows, the DOW and the S&P were up nearly 60% and the NASDAQ nearly 80%.



Ken
It's always this way - Republicans muck up the economy, Democrats come around to fix it. Obama has done a great job, the stimulus and bailouts are working, we are indeed recovering from this bad recession. It will be slow and gradual over several years, but I shudder to think what the war-mongering, tight-fisted (when it comes to spending on Americans) Republican regime would have done had they been in office. We'd all be speaking Chinese by now if it were up to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 08:16 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,605,811 times
Reputation: 18521
It is a house of cards, bracing for a breeze to come knock it all down.

You will see the collapse of our dollar in less than 2 years(They are predicting in a year), if we keep doing what were are doing.
Interest rates are going to have to come up, which will kill any housing recovery.

Just like the Great Depression of the 30's, and our administration, not learning what went wrong then, will also cause the bubble to burst. They are traveling down that same path.

It took a World War to get us out of the last one.

The economy did not just have a heart attack; we are suffering from financial appendicitis. Instead of doing the necessary surgery, Congress is prescribing potent addictive painkillers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,454,776 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feel The Love View Post
I made a killing this year, while I watched all the Beck types run out and buy gold at the top of the market. Way to go yahoos.
That's the herd mentality. I bought some GLD at $70 and then sold it at $105. Took my profit and then moved elsewhere.

By the time the herd starts buying something it's usually at its peak and that's when you get out.

The key is to get in early. It's not just the Beck types that do this; its the people that follow MSM advice of what to buy and sell. Heck just look at Cramer and all the damage he's done to people's portfolio.

Never buy something when it's being touted by any MSM financial guru as a good buy. That means it's at the top and you should be selling it instead if you want a profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top