Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Unions? Are they a needed security
Unions are needed to fight the unscrupulous employers 25 27.47%
Unions are not needed, as one's individual character & talent determines if they work 36 39.56%
We need both, as a checks and balances to the workforce 30 32.97%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:30 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,308,171 times
Reputation: 7364

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
So no pro-union person ever answered my question as to why you needed a union person to put a plug in an outlet at McCormick Place and a non-union person was not allowed to do it ?

Yes, unions have become their own worst enemy. In a recession that is magnified.
The article you linked makes it sound like it's more than just a person not being allowed to put a plug in an outlet. "A task force of officials from McPier, the convention bureau, the unions that work at McCormick Place, the restaurant industry and the city’s hotels will convene Wednesday to attempt to devise ways to make Chicago more competitive." The article doesn't even say which unions are involved so how can anyone research for an answer to your question, if in fact what you are saying is true. Obviously, none of the pro-union people posting here so far knows anything about the unions that work in the convention center. Unions are not all the same, and they don't all have the same contracts, work rules or leaders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:31 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatwoods View Post
OK, I'm a union member, and that rule is dumb. On the other hand, I strongly doubt anyone actually followed it.
It is that bad.

I couldn't get anything done, as a self employed, working solo on a Union project, doing a craft that was not unionized.

I had to wait to get someone to open a bucket of glue for me. I had to let them run my extension cords. They even had to sweep the floor, as I could not on a Union project. It was a complete chaotic, cluster F
The turned me off to ever doing commercial construction sites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:32 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,388,406 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Nope because he was talking about Americans buying what Americans made.
Consume what we produce. That cannot be said for the third world nations now producing for us. They can produce but they cannot consume what they produce because they cannot afford it. It comes back to us, the American consumer to purchase.

Problem is though that our standard of living is being lowered and soon we won't be able to afford them either.
The problem with that argument though is that in the 1950s the reason Americans consumed what Americans made was because Americans were the only people making things on a large scale. Japan, China, Europe and Russia were reduced to ashes following WWII and most of the rest of the world was fighting for its independence. Those days are gone forever and they probably are not coming back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,323,498 times
Reputation: 2888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatwoods View Post
OK, I'm a union member, and that rule is dumb. On the other hand, I strongly doubt anyone actually followed it.
I guarantee you they follow it. My dad used to do trade shows at McCormick place and had to wait 1.5 hours for the union worker to come and plug in the lighting for their display. No Joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:35 PM
 
716 posts, read 1,119,356 times
Reputation: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
I guarantee you they follow it. My dad used to do trade shows at McCormick place and had to wait 1.5 hours for the union worker to come and plug in the lighting for their display. No Joke.

Alright, I agree that rule should go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:39 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,908,341 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Are you aware that as of the 2007 contract new hire-ins at GM only get $14 to $15 an hour with no pensions rights? The UAW has been making concessions to the auto industry for a decade to help the companies stay solvent. And the $71 an hour figure people like to quote included the value of their health care and benefits. It's not the amount they take home plus health care. Of course, many people don't know that GM no longer even pays health care costs for current employees or retirees because VEBA was accepted by the UAW midway through the last decade. The union takes care of health care now through VEBA which could be grossly be underfunded in the future if GM stock doesn't go up. VEBA was a plan dreamed up by GM to wash their hands of health care. They were to pay the union 3 lump sums of cash in exchange for this concession. They paid the first year's payment and filed for bankruptcy before the second and third payments were made. That is why the federal bankruptcy judge gave the UAW the stock...because they are a major bond holder. The UAW plans to sell the stock as soon as they are able and to diversify.

You're wrong. Unions are NOT their own worst enemy.
unions became their own worst enemy when they started the push for illegal immigration. they gave up american workers for the chance to get more members, and it backfired on everyone. they also became their own worst enemy when they promised employees more than they could deliver and needed to be bailed out by the taxpayers of this country.

we don't have the job base to support all of these service workers, especially with the obliteration of our manufacturing industry and outsourcing of good jobs.

how can people not see that a surplus of workers will drive wages down all by itself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,323,498 times
Reputation: 2888
LOL Floridasandy I love your tag "Things that can't go on forever, don't." You should add to it "unless you are a union-backed company that the government bails out."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:44 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,308,171 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
unions became their own worst enemy when they started the push for illegal immigration. they gave up american workers for the chance to get more members, and it backfired on everyone. they also became their own worst enemy when they promised employees more than they could deliver and needed to be bailed out by the taxpayers of this country.

we don't have the job base to support all of these service workers, especially with the obliteration of our manufacturing industry and outsourcing of good jobs.

how can people not see that a surplus of workers will drive wages down all by itself?
What union are you talking about? I've never heard of a UAW union---who I was talking about---"pushing for illegal immigration." That sounds more like something involving farm workers in California.

http://www.union-organizing.com/unions.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:48 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,908,341 times
Reputation: 4459
part of the problem with the autoworkers union was that they were promising what they could not deliver to their workers. here are just a few facts from 2006, before GM went belly up:

without the UAW, GM would not now be in process of attempting to pay up to $140,000 per man, just to get them to quit. (that is not productive labor)

without the UAW, GM would not now have healthcare obligations that account for more than $1,600 of the cost of every vehicle it produces.

without the UAW, GM would not now have pension obligations which, if entered on its balance sheet in accordance with the rule now being proposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, will leave it with a net worth of MINUS 16 MILLION.

greed and incompetence brought GM and chrysler down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2010, 03:51 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,908,341 times
Reputation: 4459
as far as illegal immigrants, here is the official UAW (united automobile workers) statement:

The UAW believes we urgently need to reform our immigration system to put an end to all these abuses. In our judgment, any immigration reform must:

• Speed up the process for individuals to enter our country lawfully, so they are not faced with lengthy backlogs.


• Ensure full, equal and enforceable workplace rights for all employees, including immigrant workers, both documented and undocumented. This is fair and equitable, and is the only way to ensure that unscrupulous employers do not exploit immigrant workers, and use them to undermine workplace rights, pay and benefits for all employees.

• Establish a well-defined path to allow immigrant and guest workers to adjust their status and eventually become permanent residents and citizens. As a matter of decency and fair play, immigrant and guest workers who have been contributing their labor and have paid taxes for many years in this country should be allowed to become stakeholders in our society. This is essential to prevent the creation of a permanent underclass of indentured workers who will inevitably be exploited and used to undermine the standard of living of all workers.

• Continue to permit international student workers to work for universities, and to become permanent residents and citizens. This will enhance the intellectual and cultural environment at our universities, while also helping to ensure that international student workers are compensated equitably and have equal workplace rights.

they have been NO help trying to get americans to be able to hang onto their own jobs in their own country! what we need is a taxpayer union to protect us from the other unions, big business, and the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top