Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-10-2010, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,069,526 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by red red rose View Post
Keep your racist crap to yourself.
See who your bed fellows really are Red?


 
Old 05-10-2010, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,069,526 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Now if you know that can you tell me why they were created and why only the United States has such thing?
Well there you go.

The United States is not the only nation that "has such a thing." There are more than a dozen other countries too. Mexico and Canada among them.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 12:04 PM
 
180 posts, read 202,646 times
Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
But the 14th Amendment doesn't say anything about the parents at all. It does not say (as you mistakenly paraphrase above) that their parents must be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." It says that they must be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

As as the US Supreme Court has so clearly explained, the phrase is meant to exclude the children of foreign diplomats and occupying armies, and no other class of people.

Since illegal immigrants are neither foreign diplomats nor occupying armies, their children (if born here) are natural born American citizens.
I stand corrected.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 12:28 PM
 
1,503 posts, read 1,155,524 times
Reputation: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by wranglerdavis View Post
I think the key phrase as far as if someone is born here is if their parents were "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Since an illegal immigrant isn't subject to our laws (here illegally) their children shouldn't technically be citizens according to the 14th ammendment. However, since it is granted by assumption, this is a moot point.
An illegal as well as legal immigrant is subject to our laws when in our country. If not we couldn't try them for crimes. Those with diplomatic immunity are not subject to our laws, nor are their children who are not citizens.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,824,896 times
Reputation: 699
"If the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court . . . the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal." Lincoln

For all those quoting Wong and other cases regarding a natural born citizen.

The first President who is considered a natural born citizen after the Constitution was approved is Polk. He was born to US citizen parents. That is the standard.

There is no way Obama can be a natural born citizen if his father is an African. That makes Obama half African and half American (if he was born in Hawaii).

Millions of people think this.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,041,135 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
"If the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court . . . the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal." Lincoln

For all those quoting Wong and other cases regarding a natural born citizen.

The first President who is considered a natural born citizen after the Constitution was approved is Polk. He was born to US citizen parents. That is the standard.

There is no way Obama can be a natural born citizen if his father is an African. That makes Obama half African and half American (if he was born in Hawaii).

Millions of people think this.
Millions of people are wrong about that, too.

All the requirement is for one to be a natural born citizen is to be born on US soil. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 07:23 PM
 
Location: NW Houston
229 posts, read 241,224 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langlen View Post
Millions of people are wrong about that, too.

All the requirement is for one to be a natural born citizen is to be born on US soil. Nothing more, nothing less.
Sad but true. So when the mexican mother who de-hydrates herself crossing the desert her child has a great chance of being brain damaged or a whole host of other things.

This is unfair to that child that will live a lifetime with a handi-cap and it is unfair for the rest of us to support that child through social programs.

That takes away from seniors and children born from two legal US citizens.
It hurts everyone else ...

They should have just spelled it out. Slaves and thier children are citizens. No natural born, ... once you can speak english and pass a test .... Bingo!! Your a citizen. After lawful entrance of course and after restitution is paid in full is the entry was not legal.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Long Island
1,147 posts, read 1,898,428 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by deturmind View Post
Sad but true. So when the mexican mother who de-hydrates herself crossing the desert her child has a great chance of being brain damaged or a whole host of other things.

This is unfair to that child that will live a lifetime with a handi-cap and it is unfair for the rest of us to support that child through social programs.

That takes away from seniors and children born from two legal US citizens.
It hurts everyone else ...

They should have just spelled it out. Slaves and thier children are citizens. No natural born, ... once you can speak english and pass a test .... Bingo!! Your a citizen. After lawful entrance of course and after restitution is paid in full is the entry was not legal.

What does any of that have to do with being a natural born citizen?
 
Old 05-10-2010, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,041,135 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIOC View Post
What does any of that have to do with being a natural born citizen?
I think what they're saying is that the requirements to become a "natural born citizen" are too open.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langlen View Post
I think what they're saying is that the requirements to become a "natural born citizen" are too open.
The constitution is what it is. Too bad for some of these birthers, but they don't get to make up their own personal version of the constitution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top