Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why not just admit you have a problem with a black guy being president?
yay... another racist.
AGAIN, for those of you who have difficulty getting past your racism, the precedent for this type of questioning was set over 100 years ago with Chester Arthur.
Fuss over Obama birthplace evokes Chester A. Arthur citizenship debate | North America > United States from AllBusiness.com (http://www.allbusiness.com/government/elections-politics-politics-political-parties/12681667-1.html - broken link)
My birth certificate certainly doesn't include my mother's or my father's residence. Doesn't name the hospital. Doesn't have a doctor's signature. Doesn't list any witnesses. If yours has all this info, it must be a very long birth certificate, indeed.
No, it's just one page. That's really not a lot of info.
AGAIN, for those of you who have difficulty getting past your racism, the precedent for this type of questioning was set over 100 years ago with Chester Arthur.
Fuss over Obama birthplace evokes Chester A. Arthur citizenship debate | North America > United States from AllBusiness.com (http://www.allbusiness.com/government/elections-politics-politics-political-parties/12681667-1.html - broken link)
The precedent for asking the question may have started with Arthur but the precedent for not accepting the authentication of a state on the validity of a birth document started with Obama. The state authorities---Republicans at that---have no reason to lie.
AGAIN, for those of you who have difficulty getting past your racism, the precedent for this type of questioning was set over 100 years ago with Chester Arthur.
Fuss over Obama birthplace evokes Chester A. Arthur citizenship debate | North America > United States from AllBusiness.com (http://www.allbusiness.com/government/elections-politics-politics-political-parties/12681667-1.html - broken link)
President Arthur is irrelevant. Obama has produced a birth certificate, and that birth certificate has been upheld by the State of Hawaii. The so-called doubts, therefore, have to depend on an allegation that the State of Hawaii is lying. No court in the United States is going to arrive at such a conclusion.
No, it's just one page. That's really not a lot of info.
Example shown here (note: it's not a pamphlet):
That document in #283 is questionable and looks to have been made in Word. Note how the lines horizontal lines don't match up on the left with the vertical line. Typical frustration for Word users trying to make a form like that. You would never find that on an official document.
Translation: SLCPUNK knows he doesn't have an airtight case, so he resorts to insults and name-calling.
Could that possibly be any more obvious?
Pot, meet Kettle:
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Why wouldn't you know the difference between the hospital's commemorative certificate and a state-issued birth certificate (complete with state seal) with same said information on it? It seems odd that you would be so underinformed as to what you actually had on hand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
