Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2010, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
626 posts, read 993,023 times
Reputation: 141

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
your not getting the point.
I get your point. I disagree. There is a difference.

Quote:
but how can you equate taxing all 'big' banks/thrifts etc, with the FACT that most (minus 2) have paid back all or most with PROFIT....why would this or anyother admin want to raise another tax on the people when most of the money to the PRIVATE banks has been repaid....funny how I dont see the administration looking to put this kind of tax on fanny/freddy (you know barney franks slush fund)
Because they are also responsible for the economic downturn. They don't just owe Americans the TARP money. They owe much, much more.

Quote:
yet you call BOA irrisponsible yet they have already paid back over 50%
Yes, they are irresponsible. They took on billions of dollars worth of bad loans. That is irresponsible. BOA executives were more worried about the day-to-day stock fluctuations than long-term, sustainable growth. They still are. Wall Street is still playing its game, using computer models to make profit out of nothing.

This tax will help to decentralize bank deposits. I'm all for decentralization. That makes it more difficult for Wall Street to screw us.

Quote:
btw I have two banks
one is a community bank...but it will get hit with the tax
the other is Andrews Federal Credit Union, it wont
Then your path is clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2010, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,483,709 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aqualung View Post
I
Then your path is clear.
my path is very clear, I retire with 2 pensions in 5 years at the ripe old age of 56, and I am moving to Panama. which have very low taxes and my pension will not be taxed at all. I have already bought a house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
626 posts, read 993,023 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
my path is very clear, I retire with 2 pensions in 5 years at the ripe old age of 56, and I am moving to Panama. which have very low taxes and my pension will not be taxed at all. I have already bought a house.
I hope you won't be filling out any absentee ballots. The fewer baby boomers that vote, the better. It's time for your generation to step aside. Baby boomers have screwed up the country enough, already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:04 PM
 
1,902 posts, read 2,468,342 times
Reputation: 543
President Ercle will probably not only get all the money back but he might even get more by changing the rules to suit his wants. Big deal.

Ercle borrows money by signing your kids name to the note, gets paid back and then some but instead of paying back the obligation, he spends it on himself.


And we are supposed to thank him for this? I would rather not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
626 posts, read 993,023 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by coastalrap View Post
President Ercle will probably not only get all the money back but he might even get more by changing the rules to suit his wants. Big deal.

Ercle borrows money by signing your kids name to the note, gets paid back and then some but instead of paying back the obligation, he spends it on himself.


And we are supposed to thank him for this? I would rather not.
Who is "President Ercle"? The president of BOA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:08 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,914,172 times
Reputation: 4459
obama's plan has about as good a chance as our banking "czar" recovering the bonuses. (which did not happen by the way)

maybe obama should have looked the bailout bill over before he voted for it in the first place. that would have been a good time to bring up any objections. just saying.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:09 PM
 
Location: New York (liberal cesspool)
918 posts, read 816,969 times
Reputation: 222
Default Ha! delusianne kiddo...you're a laugh riot!

So things are lookin better on Wall Street are they? Forecasts all rosy...are they? If that's so then how come the Oba-jerk is screamin' at Wall Street..,

"We want our money back, and we're going to get it."

What's with the WE...all of a sudden? Doesn't that strike you as a bit strange and out of character? We suggests that WE ARE committed to something together. Not so. Usurping this form of government was not what the American people voted for. WE didn't want that! Drop the WE act Oba-doofus. It's only applicable when the people say WE have had enough of YOU!

It's because his health care mess is in trouble and he's about to be embarrased up in Massachusetts tonight and he finally senses the groundswell of rage that is gathering up in this country to envelope him, so he's bein' cute and wants to be one of us. Hell! he was always so far above us until now. HA!

He wants to make it 'appear like' he's the champion of WE The People goin' after the big, bad greedy capitalists who stole their money. Not quite true though. Oh the Goldman-Sachs and the rest of the greed Street engineers along with their Oba-buddy demonRATic political henchman stole away our resources alright, but he...Obama, gave them OUR MONEY as I recall.

Y' see this is the warmup to draggin' his favorite whipping boy, Little Georgie-boy Bush up to try to shift ALL THE BLAME on him for the mess that the Oba-jerk only claims he inherited.

Now wait on there Oba-goofus! You can't have it both ways. You knew the mess you had when you ran for the Office and now , when first the goin' gets rough you're looking to blame Bush...AGAIN? Give America a break..will ya!

Holy Moley folks. This clown, if he's anything is at least consistent.

I can hear that old Oba-refrain now...

Whine, whine whine. Da fault ain't mine.
Whine, whine whine. Da fault ain't mine.

Chorus:
Whine, whine whine. Da fault ain't mine.

Will it ever end...

Last edited by doctorhugo; 01-19-2010 at 12:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
626 posts, read 993,023 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
obama's plan has about as good a chance as our banking "czar" recovering the bonuses. (which did not happen by the way)

maybe obama should have looked the bailout bill over before he voted for it in the first place. that would have been a good time to bring up any objections. just saying.....
Actually, it has a much better chance since it would be a tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:18 PM
 
1,902 posts, read 2,468,342 times
Reputation: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aqualung View Post
Who is "President Ercle"? The president of BOA?
Maybe you know him as Urkle.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
626 posts, read 993,023 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctorhugo View Post
So things are lookin better on Wall Street are they? Forecasts all rosy...are they? If that's so then how come the Oba-jerk is screamin' at Wall Street..,
This is flawed logic. The state of Wall Street is not the issue, it's the tactics used by Wall Street, tactics that provide no tangible economic benefit, but cause harm to middle and lower class Americans.

Quote:
"We want our money back, and we're going to get it."

What's with the WE...all of a sudden? Doesn't that strike you as a bit strange and out of character? We suggests that WE ARE committed to something together. Not so. Usurping this form of governemnt was no what the American people voted for. WE didn't want that!
Drop the WE Oba-doofus. It's only applocable when the people say WE have had enough of YOU!
He may not speak for you, but he does speak for a lot of people. Not everyone is so ideologically aligned as you. Some people are just trying to make it, and they're angry at the banks...and for good reason.

Quote:
...
The rest of your post is pure garbage.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7w64...eature=related
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top