Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2010, 07:34 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,843,220 times
Reputation: 9283

Advertisements

Its a luxury and in times of deep financial problems it should ALWAYS be put on hold... if I am out of job, I don't go and eat $100 steaks... I agree with Obama, he is doing good on this one...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2010, 07:36 PM
 
Location: just here
1,773 posts, read 1,265,381 times
Reputation: 438
Ok, I know for a fact when I was lurking on this forum that republican posters were talking about how NASA was a waste. And now that Obama has this idea, suddenly you're in love w/NASA? Come on!!! This is a clear example of complete & utter hypocrite BS. What is wrong w/you????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in Kentucky
3,791 posts, read 8,896,286 times
Reputation: 2448
Quote:
Originally Posted by wedjat View Post
Ok, I know for a fact when I was lurking on this forum that republican posters were talking about how NASA was a waste. And now that Obama has this idea, suddenly you're in love w/NASA? Come on!!! This is a clear example of complete & utter hypocrite BS. What is wrong w/you????
I voted for Obama and started this thread. You wrap your head around that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma City
757 posts, read 802,609 times
Reputation: 238
Default Republican direction?

It does appear to be true that the Republicans are just the party of "no" as long as it concerns the Obama Adm.. Regardless of what is best for the Country. For months Republicans have complained of excessive spending and when Obama tries to reduce spending, they complain again. Obvious partisan politics at play. Republicans have said for months now that the main issue is the economy. Americans agree with Jobs and Health care rounding out the top 3. Space exploration and funding for NASA do not make the top 10 of Americans concerns.

Source: Problems and Priorities
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 07:53 PM
 
Location: just here
1,773 posts, read 1,265,381 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by kentuckydad95 View Post
I voted for Obama and started this thread. You wrap your head around that one.
Ok, great. I guess you're not in the majority of people that I was talking about. I have the utmost respect for NASA, I've even defended their programs many many many times when people on the right kept screaming about how NASA was useless. I don't think NASA is useless, I think NASA is great & I'm always interested in it. However, it is something that in the grand scheme of things right now should be cut. Now, if you ask me about the local park system here & the cuts they've gone thru, I'll scream holy terror, lol. I guess I'm a hypocrite...we all have our own interests & what we think is important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 08:15 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,960,211 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by kentuckydad95 View Post
My question is, what happens to all the money that has already been pumped into the Constellation program? Oh that's right...
Sunk cost fallacy.

Has Constellation been a well-run program, delivering on time and on budget? Not really. Ares-I was supposed to be a low-cost platform, using stuff from the parts bin (notably an elongated version of the Shuttle SRBs) to cut down on development cost. Sounds good on paper, but it hasn't worked out so well.

Ares-Ix was a half-billion mock-up launched to "show progress" - looked like an Ares-I, but very much wasn't. Even so, it uncovered serious problems with the entire design.

And Ares-V is paper.

Even on paper, neither of them have sufficient lift to support a moon mission, anyway - the proposed solution is Earth Orbit Rendezvous, launching two rockets and docking in LEO.

Keeping a program like that alive isn't necessarily a great idea. There is serious private development happening in the LEO business - hopefully, we'll see SpaceX rise to the challenge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,031,240 times
Reputation: 1464
Republicans have always been huge supporters of NASA, myself included. Reagan pushed for the GPS system as well as the Space Station Freedom (which would later form the base of the ISS). H.W. Bush was also big on the space program with his [far-fetched] plans for a space station orbiting Mars as part of the SEI. After the fall of the USSR further space endavors fell out of public interest..

India and China are both planning manned Moon missions in the near future..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 08:32 PM
 
1,384 posts, read 2,345,464 times
Reputation: 781
The irony is that NASA is probably one of the government's most successful programs.

My understanding of the moon mission was that it was supposed to be a stepping stone for future travel to Mars. I think it's important for humans to continue expanding into our universe but I understand why funding is being cut short now.

I only wish they'd look into the hundreds of other government programs that waste money hand over fist and bring the ax down on them appropriately as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Bike to Surf!
3,078 posts, read 11,060,181 times
Reputation: 3022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Sunk cost fallacy.

Has Constellation been a well-run program, delivering on time and on budget? Not really. Ares-I was supposed to be a low-cost platform, using stuff from the parts bin (notably an elongated version of the Shuttle SRBs) to cut down on development cost. Sounds good on paper, but it hasn't worked out so well.

Ares-Ix was a half-billion mock-up launched to "show progress" - looked like an Ares-I, but very much wasn't. Even so, it uncovered serious problems with the entire design...

...Keeping a program like that alive isn't necessarily a great idea. There is serious private development happening in the LEO business - hopefully, we'll see SpaceX rise to the challenge.
I agree, thank God someone finally put the last nail in the coffin of the swizzle stick. They would've been calling the Ares I "Widowmaker" had it gone into full-scale production and use. The SRM's have been the cause--directly and indirectly--of both Shuttle disasters. You can't shut them off if there's a problem, you can't bump them on the way to the pad (from UTAH!) lest the propellant grain separate on launch, plug the nozzle, and turn the stack into a gigantic bomb.

So we took the deadliest, least efficient, and most-hated-by-astronauts part of the STS and made everybody ride on that pogo stick? It was a terrible idea from the get-go and 85% of honest AAE's will tell you that they didn't trust the thing. The other 15% being ATK employees.

Solids and people don't mix. I'm sad to see NASA loose the funding, but if something had to die, I'm glad it was Aries I.

I don't believe that private industry beyond SpaceX and government-propped, non-man-rated (or at least not yet) Delta and Atlas have the wherewithal to put people in orbit, but maybe it's time we fell demonstrably behind the Chinese in order to goad us out of our malaise. Or maybe I'm wrong about private space access. Wouldn't that be wonderful?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2010, 12:30 PM
 
Location: The Lone Star State
8,030 posts, read 9,048,116 times
Reputation: 5050
Arrow Obama did an about-face. Surprising? Of course not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Art123 View Post
Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

Fund it = wasteful spending.
Scrap it = letting the rest of the world "beat us in space."

Didn't Bush want us to go to Mars? Seriously.
I'm glad JFK didn't think this way. How differently things would have turned out!


Feb 2009:
Obama backs Moon return in NASA budget - space - 26 February 2009 - New Scientist

Now:
Obama Budget Plan Grounds NASA Despite Increased Funding - TIME


And it's just another example of how he doesn't live up to his promises and can't be trusted....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top