Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Where Should The First High Speed Train Be Built?
Boston to Richmond 32 18.82%
San Diego to San Fransisco 23 13.53%
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-Palm Beach-Orlando-Jacksonville 11 6.47%
Milwaukee to New Orleans 10 5.88%
Los Angeles to Las Vegas 9 5.29%
Dallas-Austin-San Antonio-Houston-New Orleans 18 10.59%
Other 19 11.18%
Don't Build Any High Speed Rail 48 28.24%
Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:23 PM
GLS
 
1,985 posts, read 5,380,148 times
Reputation: 2472

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
OK so we are going to build a high speed train. So the question is where should it be built? I am not against speedy rail service but it seems that the best place to start such a thing would be in highly congested areas with a medium to high population density. I would say Boston to Richmond VA would be the ideal place to start on the east coast and San Diego to San Fransisco on the west coast. But there are other proposals. What do you think?
In Napa Valley so we can go wine-tasting at 300mph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpNort View Post
Who is paying for this? This country is broke and unemployment is sky high. Tell me why we need these rails at this point in time?
You are! By the way, thanks. I travel from Tampa to Orlando quite a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:28 PM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,344,990 times
Reputation: 2901
Inter coastal? To compete with the planes, in which case I suppose it should pass through Dallas, considering how much of a hub it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:31 PM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,241,172 times
Reputation: 4622
Back in the GOOD OLD DAYS of trains I took a train from Houston, Texas to Portland, Oregon..Up to 100 miles per hour....It took three days to get there........Never again even at up to 200 miles per hour...I'll fly....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:37 PM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,241,172 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
We provide subsidies for federal interstates , state highways , county
highways and local city streets...why not light and heavy rail & (Bullets
Trains)?????
Because once you build the highway using tax dollars you don't have to buy a ticket to travel on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:37 PM
 
Location: NorthTexas
634 posts, read 1,558,705 times
Reputation: 327
I think high speed rail systems should be built everywhere! They are the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Jackson, MS
1,008 posts, read 3,392,184 times
Reputation: 609
I have read that most of the trains will not exceed 110 mph and some will be maxed at 79 mph, with the only trains exceeding 110 mph being in California [the area where earthquakes occur... go figure].

If this system is going to work and be the most efficient, ie maximize ridership, then the speeds need to be much higher than vehicular traffic. Personal vehicles are convenient, so you have to make the pro's of the rail system greatly outweigh the pro's of vehicles - which is why all of the main trains need to exceed 200 mph. Regional trains should travel at app. 150 mph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:48 PM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,564,801 times
Reputation: 5018
actually the high speed trains in Florida will exceed 168 mph which should be easy to do since the Florida route is basically flat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:49 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,583,593 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Houston3 View Post
Because once you build the highway using tax dollars you don't have to buy a ticket to travel on it.
Oh yes you do , Department Of Motor Vehicles , Auto Insurances , Repairs , cost of an automobile etc. etc. etc.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 02:52 PM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,564,801 times
Reputation: 5018
^ I guess he has never heard of tolls! We retired the bonds for the Florida Turnpike decades ago and yet it is a toll road! They are now tolling Interstates here in Florida as well! Remember they were supposed to be free??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top