Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-29-2010, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,264,475 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

When Scott Brown won the Senatorial election in Massachusetts last week many Democrats in DC made some severe changes in how they perform their duties. A Republican winning one seat in the Senate that gives the party 41 seats really changed things for many of them.

I think that the very reason for those changes is the fact that politicians really can read the numbers in polls, and the most serious polls for them are election results.

Great Scott! by Thomas Sowell on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2010, 01:06 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,383,703 times
Reputation: 18436
Default A mirage win for Regressives desperate for relevancy

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
When Scott Brown won the Senatorial election in Massachusetts last week many Democrats in DC made some severe changes in how they perform their duties. A Republican winning one seat in the Senate that gives the party 41 seats really changed things for many of them.

I think that the very reason for those changes is the fact that politicians really can read the numbers in polls, and the most serious polls for them are election results.

[url=http://www.creators.com/opinion/thomas-sowell.html?columnsName=tso]Great Scott! by Thomas Sowell on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent[/ur
An unlikely win like this fails to do two things:

1) It fails to erase the knowledge this country has that after 8 years of Bush and Republican control, Republicans are clueless across the board on all issues foreign and domestic. Regressives are no longer qualified to be a major political party. When you are in office, you send the country into near Depressions, run up record deficits, get into people's pockets NOT by more taxes but by deregulation so that businesses and banks can charge more fees, pay less for more of your time. When you are in control and required to help the country, you lie to go to war,apply the incorrect kind and amount of force during the war, and ultimately cause this country to bleed to death by the losing effort. So Brown's win merely means that there is yet another clueless conservative senator now.

2) It fails to diminish president Obama in any way. Obama is a man who reaches across the table, listens to the other side, develops solutions that work. He's now successfully digging this country out of a hole that took the Republicans 8 years to get us into. A win by Brown does nothing to hamper Obama.

...so dream on Regressives. Over 8 years, you were clueless and to no one's surprise, you all still are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 01:28 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexus View Post
An unlikely win like this fails to do two things:

1) It fails to erase the knowledge this country has that after 8 years of Bush and Republican control, Republicans are clueless across the board on all issues foreign and domestic. Regressives are no longer qualified to be a major political party. When you are in office, you send the country into near Depressions, run up record deficits, get into people's pockets NOT by more taxes but by deregulation so that businesses and banks can charge more fees, pay less for more of your time. When you are in control and required to help the country, you lie to go to war,apply the incorrect kind and amount of force during the war, and ultimately cause this country to bleed to death by the losing effort. So Brown's win merely means that there is yet another clueless conservative senator now.

2) It fails to diminish president Obama in any way. Obama is a man who reaches across the table, listens to the other side, develops solutions that work. He's now successfully digging this country out of a hole that took the Republicans 8 years to get us into. A win by Brown does nothing to hamper Obama.

...so dream on Regressives. Over 8 years, you were clueless and to no one's surprise, you all still are.


Coping with Grief and Loss: Support for Grieving and Bereavement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 02:52 AM
 
Location: Hawaii
1,688 posts, read 4,299,250 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
When Scott Brown won the Senatorial election in Massachusetts last week many Democrats in DC made some severe changes in how they perform their duties. A Republican winning one seat in the Senate that gives the party 41 seats really changed things for many of them.

I think that the very reason for those changes is the fact that politicians really can read the numbers in polls, and the most serious polls for them are election results.

Great Scott! by Thomas Sowell on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent
Great Post.

I would like Obama to just come clean. You can't do a 180 like he did and rationalize it by unvieling this terrific jobs agenda as if it was planned all along. Where has it been? Why wasn't he agressively pursuing jobs on all those TV appearances and the 199 speaches he had to desperately schedule for our sake? Obama had to save us before the doctors tore out all our childrens tonsills. I truly believe he seriously is aloof.

I have written before about this "Roosovelt Watermark" he wants attributed to "Changing America" on his limited watch. He longs for a lost father figure to replace his untoward childhood and the hollow relationgship being raised by his white family.

The twinky defense is old. Obama is having a "Scott Brown Moment"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 08:38 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,151,733 times
Reputation: 6195
Default Great Scott!!


Brad! Janet! Dr. Scott! Rocky!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 08:40 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,845,032 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexus View Post
An unlikely win like this fails to do two things:

1) It fails to erase the knowledge this country has that after 8 years of Bush and Republican control, Republicans are clueless across the board on all issues foreign and domestic. Regressives are no longer qualified to be a major political party. When you are in office, you send the country into near Depressions, run up record deficits, get into people's pockets NOT by more taxes but by deregulation so that businesses and banks can charge more fees, pay less for more of your time. When you are in control and required to help the country, you lie to go to war,apply the incorrect kind and amount of force during the war, and ultimately cause this country to bleed to death by the losing effort. So Brown's win merely means that there is yet another clueless conservative senator now.

2) It fails to diminish president Obama in any way. Obama is a man who reaches across the table, listens to the other side, develops solutions that work. He's now successfully digging this country out of a hole that took the Republicans 8 years to get us into. A win by Brown does nothing to hamper Obama.

...so dream on Regressives. Over 8 years, you were clueless and to no one's surprise, you all still are.
lol For a republican to win in Mass it appears to do just that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:22 AM
 
1,224 posts, read 1,287,005 times
Reputation: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
When Scott Brown won the Senatorial election in Massachusetts last week many Democrats in DC made some severe changes in how they perform their duties. A Republican winning one seat in the Senate that gives the party 41 seats really changed things for many of them.

I think that the very reason for those changes is the fact that politicians really can read the numbers in polls, and the most serious polls for them are election results.

Great Scott! by Thomas Sowell on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent
I'm glad that Sowell shares my feelings about Obama's egomaniacal healthcare agenda. I honestly feel that Obama could care less how his policies affect this nation as long as his name is forever associated with the legislation. I concur with the posters assessment of a Roosevelt watermark that is sought by Mr. Obama.

Apparently the Massachusett voters hated their state-controlled healthcare system enough to take a slap at the federal program promised by Obama,...by electing Brown. They were saying,..."...can you hear me now?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:26 AM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,138,039 times
Reputation: 2908
82% of those voting for Brown did so because they wanted him to work with the Democrats. They didn't vote for him because he was Republican, they voted for him because he'd do the job. I agree with Alexus that this does nothing to Obama, except, of course, in the minds of partisan people who can't think in anything other than black and white.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Hawaii
1,688 posts, read 4,299,250 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
82% of those voting for Brown did so because they wanted him to work with the Democrats. They didn't vote for him because he was Republican, they voted for him because he'd do the job. I agree with Alexus that this does nothing to Obama, except, of course, in the minds of partisan people who can't think in anything other than black and white.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top