Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Feb. 3 (Bloomberg Multimedia) -- The U.S. may lose 824,000 jobs when the government releases its annual revision to employment data on Feb. 5, showing the labor market was in worse shape during the recession than known at the time.
Feb. 3 (Bloomberg Multimedia) -- The U.S. may lose 824,000 jobs when the government releases its annual revision to employment data on Feb. 5, showing the labor market was in worse shape during the recession than known at the time.
Well the military can always use more troops so there's an option, that's one way the average man can benefit from government depending upon how u look at it.
Well the military can always use more troops so there's an option, that's one way the average man can benefit from government depending upon how u look at it.
If only we had money for them. Oh well, we could confiscate gold from private citizens and redistribute among the troops as compensation. Would the military be considered "the enemy" among the people in such a case?
If only we had money for them. Oh well, we could confiscate gold from private citizens and redistribute among the troops as compensation. Would the military be considered "the enemy" among the people in such a case?
Not if the people become soldiers. We do have money for military, Obama is freezing spending, except on essentials like homeland security and healthcare, we the people need to be taken care of.
Not if the people become soldiers. We do have money for military, Obama is freezing spending, except on essentials like homeland security and healthcare, we the people need to be taken care of.
Tax revenues are insufficient to pay for the military + SS + medicare alone.
Feb. 3 (Bloomberg Multimedia) -- The U.S. may lose 824,000 jobs when the government releases its annual revision to employment data on Feb. 5, showing the labor market was in worse shape during the recession than known at the time.
The title of this article is deceptive. It says the US "may lose" jobs, as if this event has yet to happen. But the article is actually talking about the annual revision of the jobs report covering the period from part of 2008 to part of 2009. It's about an event that has already happened during a time when Obama was not even president.
The title should have read "US May Have Lost 824,000 Jobs...."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
