Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by World Citizen View Post
Allowing the industry to self regulate it's costs hasn't worked out too well... has it?
no it hasnt

but putting the government in charge, certainly isnt going to work well either


it (private industry) or the government(singlepayer) cant regulate the cost of outside things

please read my rant (I apologize for its length) and try to see my point
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
Your style of writing makes it very hard for me to read your post.


With single-payer, there is just one entity that the bills are sent to, not thousands like in our country where we have lots of health insurance companies.

I am sorry if my posts are difficult to read

but even with single payer you cant control the costs

can you control the administrative costs....YES

but you cant control what an x-ray machine made in china costs
you cant control what johnson and johnson wants to charge for antiseptic


that is my point


most people only think with blinders on and they only see "oh insurance is too costly" or 'omg, look at what the doctor is charging' instead of seeing the WHOLE PICTURE.... most people only see the doctor pocketing that $70 for the office vist...they dont see that that xxx amount of dollars that the doctor charges has to cover NOT ONLY his salary, but the rent/mortgage, the taxes, his insurance, his electric bill, his employees, any equipment/supplies that he needs to make his SERVICE to you better
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:34 AM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,044,900 times
Reputation: 2949
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
no it hasnt

but putting the government in charge, certainly isnt going to work well either


it (private industry) or the government(singlepayer) cant regulate the cost of outside things

please read my rant (I apologize for its length) and try to see my point
again.... Doing nothing is not the answer.

In the age of computers, I do believe that single payer can do much to control costs.

As it is right now, you have thousands of individuals across the US who purchase supplies ... no one really knows what someone else may be paying for the same item.

Fear of the unknown and of change is the real boogyman that we're facing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:38 AM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,044,900 times
Reputation: 2949
Default The Writing on the Wall...

Anthem having the audacity to raise Individual policy rates by 39% THIS YEAR is just icing on the cake.

39% in a state where they know that the Republican governor is on their side.

39% when their profits are already through the roof!

Last edited by World Citizen; 02-09-2010 at 09:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,786,757 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
I am sorry if my posts are difficult to read

but even with single payer you cant control the costs

can you control the administrative costs....YES

but you cant control what an x-ray machine made in china costs
you cant control what johnson and johnson wants to charge for antiseptic


that is my point


most people only think with blinders on and they only see "oh insurance is too costly" or 'omg, look at what the doctor is charging' instead of seeing the WHOLE PICTURE.... most people only see the doctor pocketing that $70 for the office vist...they dont see that that xxx amount of dollars that the doctor charges has to cover NOT ONLY his salary, but the rent/mortgage, the taxes, his insurance, his electric bill, his employees, any equipment/supplies that he needs to make his SERVICE to you better
The government can negotiate these costs.

As for x-ray machines, I suggest you read: Amazon.com: Taming the Beloved Beast: How Medical Technology Costs Are Destroying Our Health Care System (9780691142364): Daniel Callahan: Books

No matter whats side of the aisle you find yourself, it's a great read.
This book is a great read as well: Amazon.com: The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care (9781594202346): T. R. Reid: Books

Though I am a huge single-payer proponent but I also like the German system as well: Most Patients Happy With German Health Care : NPR

The crazy part is that most of our medical spending is on the sickest 10%-20%.

As WorldCitizen keeps saying, doing nothing is not the answer.

Instead of trying to attack my sources and everything else, what solutions do you propose workingclasshero?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
The crazy part is that most of our medical spending is on the sickest 10%-20%.

As WorldCitizen keeps saying, doing nothing is not the answer.

Instead of trying to attack my sources and everything else, what solutions do you propose workingclasshero?

I agree that doing nothing is not the answer

I have said for years get rid of the insurance companies as far as covering every sniffle someone has...I believe going back to a "hospitalization" tpye of insurance might work

as far as reducing the actual cost, I am not sure what can be done

do we want to regulate what someone can make...ie a set wage for a doctor....would that be set by region(area).....would that be set by competence??? ie are we going to pay a really great doctor the same as we would pay a quack???

if we can control electric costs that would help...but until the government is out of the pocket of the elecrtic/power companies that wont happen.....I have said a while ago , that will all the stimulus/bailout monies that we spent we could have put a solar elecrtic system on every single house in america...the effect would be a true elecrtic grid, powered by the people, and the elimination of electric companies...did our government even THINK ABOUT IT...not that I know

even with the costs of machines, we cant really control that, unless we take over all the manufacturing companies too.....even then if it cost them $100 to make then we cant expect them to sell it for $99

I am not saying I have the answers...that is why I am ASKING the questions....JUST HOW can/will we control costs. in a field that costs are ever spiraling upward?????

in a singlepayer system we are RELYING on the taxpayer, many 55-65 year olds are only working in order to have health insurance, before medicare kicks in at 65.....adding single payer system we will see many people retire....curently SS is hurting,,,less people are working..meaning less money coming into the government...right now we cant even have our government operating without a defecit (spending more than is coming in) and our debt is crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 10:22 AM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,044,900 times
Reputation: 2949
workingclasshero,

The kind of coverage you've described is group coverage. Group coverage is something that is really becoming hard to come by for most Americans.
Employers are discontinuing it -- some are even demoting long time employees to keep from paying it -- and many are hiring new employees only as temporary and seasonal to keep from paying for Health Care Coverage.

People having a $5000 deductible on an Individual policy (like I have) in order to afford insurance is, in effect, already doing what you've suggested - "hospitalization type insurance."

I pay almost $300 per month for a policy like that. In effect I pay for everything --if I go to the doctor. (I don't go.)
I pay almost $3,600 per year for a policy that I don't use. I can't afford to use my insurance because the deductible is so high.
Even with insurance, a major illness will be catastrophic for me.

If you read through the Maine forum's discussion, many other people have already purchased $5000 deductible policies trying to "stay insured".
Facing Anthem's proposed 2010 increases, many of them will probably become uninsured. Hopefully, they don't have pre-existing conditions or other health problems.
If they do, they'll have to sell what they own to keep paying Anthem.

This year... not some time in the future.... with our economy in it's current state and so many people out of work,
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield is planning to raise Individual policy premiums by 20-40%.... nationwide.

Luckily, you and I are not the ones who have to come up with the solution.

But, instead of digging in our heels, screaming how it can't be done... white knuckled from our fear of change.... maybe we should support our elected officials and allow them to do their jobs.

The truth is, our current health care system is in trouble.
Left to self regulate, health care costs and the cost of insurance have skyrocketed and are completely out of control.

We need to learn from history that self regulation only helps those people who are making money from the lack of regulation.
They may pretend to have your best interest at heart... but the truth is, it's all about money.

I once worked as a secretary in a Health Insurance Brokerage firm. I've also worked as a secretary in a Worker's Compensation division of a major Health Insurance Provider and as an Office Manager in a small business where I had first hand knowledge of Employee Health Insurance cost... what is your background?

Last edited by World Citizen; 02-09-2010 at 11:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 11:54 AM
 
6,734 posts, read 9,340,799 times
Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
How do you know that a single payer would operate on a 2% overhead?
See Medicare.

Canada's single payer coverage works on a 1% overhead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Marion, IA
2,793 posts, read 6,123,033 times
Reputation: 1613
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
Anthem Blue Cross Raises Premiums | CommonDreams.org



Anthem Blue Cross will be raising rates by 39% on March 1st.

Do any of you still want the kind of "system" where your insurer can raise rates at any moment?
whahahahaaaaa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2010, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzie679 View Post
See Medicare.

Canada's single payer coverage works on a 1% overhead.
We are not Canada - we have a MUCH bigger population than Canada - with FAR MORE health care facilities than Canada

And, Medicare is a bad example - in their limited coverages - and the fact that under their program - seniors are losing doctors. More and more doctors are REFUSING TO ACCEPT medicare.

Sorry, the references you provided are not examples of proof of the 2% overhead - not even close
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top