Quote:
Originally Posted by NYChistorygal
Still waiting.
|
I think the better question is why would anyone automatically consider the Government to be 100% trustworthy and truthful? That seems like much more of a stretch.
In any case, this is about having a grasp of history, and being able to apply logic in a contextual manner. Of course, if you are knowledgeable about all of the facts, you really don't need to be a friggin genius to get the idea that something is rotten in Denmark.
A simple example; there is nothing overly unusual about married couples having arguments, or having financial difficulties. There is nothing unusual about having a life insurance policy on your spouse. And it's not immediately cause for suspicion to have a spouse fall victim to an accident causing death. Individually, nothing is overtly out of place. But in combination, an entirely different picture emerges. And that's what we are dealing with here in 911. We have Bill and Mary fighting over Bill's huge accumulation of gambling debt which has caused a financial crisis. Mary accidentally drowns in the backyard swimming pool. As a cursory investigation finds ... Mary was a world class swimmer, and was never known to swim, wearing her street cloths and shoes. It is further discovered that Bill had just recently taken out a 5 Million life insurance policy on Mary. And, a fresh blood stain was found partially cleaned up in the couple's bedroom. When interrogated, Bill claims he had nothing to do with her death, that it was much more likely that 19 Arabs with box cutters drowned her because they hated her shoes.
But seriously, first, the historical foundation for false flag events to promote a political agenda is very common and prevalent among governments, including such acts by the US Government are well documented. That you aren't familiar with this is simply a sign that you are not as knowledgeable and aware as you think you are. Those examples I mentioned that you claim no familiarity with might be something you should look into, if you truly want to become more knowledgeable.
Aside from the well documented examples of such staged events conducted for political purposes .. there is a list of inconsistencies regarding 911 that far exceed the levels of mere coincidence. Individually, many could be explained away as irrelevant or coincidental. But, combined, they can not be. And these things don't simply go away because YOU call them conspiracy theories.
The crime itself is in fact, a conspiracy, as defined by two or more individuals conspiring to commit a crime. The government's official story is simply another conspiracy theory, albeit with more holes than a sieve.
Some of these "inconsistencies and questionable coincidences" are as follows (a brief list, not inclusive)
1) The owner took possession of the collapsed buildings victimized by the attack in a near timeframe before the event, and profited greatly.
2) No buildings of such type have ever collapsed due to fire (Building 7 was not hit by an aircraft).
3) No other buildings collapsed that day, even though many were more severally damaged and experienced greater subsequent fire damage. Only those owned by Mr. Silverstein suffered total collapse of a nature extremely similar to controlled demolition.
4) The Pentagon was running exercises emulating hijacked aircraft ramming buildings in Washington DC and NY on the morning of 911, just as the real events were unfolding (keep in mind that the officials claimed afterward that no one ever imagined that terrorists would use airplanes as weapons). These exercises not only prove that claim a lie, but most likely contributed in the failure of NORAD and the FAA to scramble interceptors in time to prevent the attack, due to the number of fantom radar contacts on their screens as part of those exercises under the command of Dick Cheney. And why is the Vice President commanding military exercises?
5) Rules governing the intercept of aircraft off course and without cockpit communications with air traffic controllers where not followed on 911, even after 2 planes had already impacted both Towers. The flight that allegedly struck the Pentagon occurred well after it was clear that an attack was underway, yet still no intercept of that plane? Given that the Pentagon is the most defended building ... and most surveilled as well, Andrews AFB located 7 miles from the Pentagon launched no aircraft until well after the events were concluded. Jets that were scrambled to protect the Pentagon came from Langley AFB, approx. 120 miles away? Something is very wrong here.
6) ODIGO, an Israeli based instant messaging company sent warnings two hours prior to the attack to it's members at the WTC.
7) The "Dancing Israelis" arrest and data has been classified. The Israelis themselves claimed they were there to document the event. Both 6 & 7 show prior knowledge of the attacks.
8) An inexplicable and highly abnormal volume of "put options" on ONLY American and United Airlines stock just prior to the attacks also suggests foreknowledge of the attacks.
9)The accelerated removal of debris and subsequent destruction of potentially valuable evidence associated with the greatest crime in US history is both illegal, and inexplicable.
10) FEMA on-site the night before the event for another "exercise".
11) The immediate confiscation of surveillance camera tapes from surrounding areas overlooking the Pentagon, along with all of the Pentagon cameras, and yet not one clear video or still shot of a Jumbo Jet crashing into it is available?
12) Though the government claims it never imagined or considered that terrorists would use jets as missiles ... those exact scenarios were the basis for the drills that morning, as well as other drills conducted a year earlier?
13) Though the official story has it that the planes and their black boxes vaporized in the blaze, one of the "hijackers" passports was found virtually unscathed amongst the debris in NY?
14) By the very next day, ALL of the alleged hijackers were identified, with pictures? Cars belonging to the hijackers were found as were plane manuals and Korans inside their luggage found in these cars? ... these suicide terrorists actually packed their bags before their trips to heaven and 17 virgin paradise? Then later, several of those hijackers identified began surfacing alive, claiming they had nothing to do with this event and were no where near the United States that day?
15) The FBI still hasn't listed Osama Bin Laden as wanted for the crime of 911. When asked why, the FBI claims that they don't have sufficient evidence to do so?
16) The Bush administration blocked efforts to even conduct an investigation, and refused to testify under oath? Bush wouldn't even be interviewed by a committee alone, and was joined by Dick Cheney to which neither would testify under oath?
17) Multiple FBI counter terrorist field agents complained about higher ups blocking their investigations of terrorists prior to 911.
18) some of the alleged hijackers received flight training at US military facilities, and at least one was known to have lived in a house rented by the CIA?
19) Mohamed Atta received $100,000 wire from a Pakistani ISI head, General Ahmad on 9-10. And as reported by the NY Times, General Ahmad also met for breakfast on the morning of 911, (while the attacks were occurring) with the two subsequent Co-Chairmen of the Joint-Intelligence Committee investigating the 9/11 attacks, Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) and Representative Porter Goss (R-FL)?
Additionally, three days after the attacks on September 14, the New York Times also reported that members of the Bush Administration met with General Ahmad, again. Those officials were: CIA Director George Tenet; Secretary of State Colin Powell; Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage; Under-Secretary of State Marc Grossman, and our current Vice President, Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) -- Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
I could list 50 more significant ones ... but if the above doesn't trigger your mind to question the validity of the official story, then neither would a video tape confession.
No one knows EXACTLY what happened on 911. And it's not likely that anyone could answer every question that would satisfy everyone regarding minute details, aside from the perpetrators themselves. So don't bother asking me silly questions like ... Well if that's true, why this ... or explain that ... because likely, no one can.
However, that certain elements of the US Government and US intelligence, along with Israeli intelligence were complicit in the financing and operational coordination of the 911 attacks is without question the only plausible explanation to many of these issues listed that we DO KNOW ABOUT. From the Pentagon exercises being run by Cheney, to the failure of the most sophisticated Air Defense Infrastructure in the world that allowed three hijacked jets to reach three targets unmolested.
We have US Officials meeting with bag man General Ahmed on several occasions prior to 911, on 911, and just after 911 is a smoking gun, especially considering that the 911 commission investigating the attacks dismissed the entire line of questioning about who funded 911 as not overly important, so it wasn't addressed.
In addition, some of the committee members complained bitterly about what a sham the entire investigation and subsequent report was.
What is clear is that Osama Bin Laden, and 19 arab hijackers couldn't have possibly managed to pull this off without a great deal of assistance from high level players.
It is simply not plausible.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
