Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well of course she would, then she would sit back carping about how 5-6 million jobs were lost because Obama did nothing to intervene. The Sanreneian School of Political Economy is that any bad news is good news.
So insulting someone is the way to positive outcomes of discussion? please refrain from childish conjecture in an otherwise serious thread. It's not helping Obama's approval rating one Iota.
Knowing what we know now and the technology we have, acting like a frog in increasingly hot water is not the best thought process to have. It's like a person knows fire burns but jumps in the pit anyway hoping for water to be splashed upon them one day.
God I love those Real Americanâ„¢ back porchie you betcha golly wow ways of saying a lot while saying nothing all at the same time.
So, if you don't mind the eastern elitisms, is your argument that Facebook, blogs and Twitter have replaced good old fashioned historical research?
If I were a patient man, and you were a reasonable one, I would attempt to discuss the merit of the various projects, but I am not patient and you are not reasonable so suffice it to say; when it comes to putting people to work, it doesn't matter whether it is pork, pork rinds, or pork chops since the purpose is provide jobs.
If I would rather save $24,000 per clunker, etc., then unreasonable is a good thing.
In fact, I'd say that the voters who cleaned Coakley's clock in MA recently, were glad to be labeled as "unreasonable".
The politicians who drove California's budget into the ground considered themselves "reasonable".
Your way of thinking is not patient either. Its actually what would be described as "selfish". Very much like Pelosi, Nelson, Reid, Boxer, Biden, Etc.. All folks who consider themselves reasonable and patient.
Didn't someone say that Reid had the "patience of Job"?
So insulting someone is the way to positive outcomes of discussion? please refrain from childish conjecture in an otherwise serious thread. It's not helping Obama's approval rating one Iota.
You are new here, some of us have long standing relationships, so until you learn the dynamics of those relationships, I would suggest butting out.
You are new here, some of us have long standing relationships, so until you learn the dynamics of those relationships, I would suggest butting out.
I'd say they should hang around. Maybe they have been following longer than some folks have been posting. They may know us, or you, better than we think. On one forum, I recall one guy posting, indicating he was even following others posting at other forums. Almost like studying them. I doubt this person is like that. But there are all kinds for sure.
Thats if one has the ability to dream.. Reagan won popularity by doing the OPPOSITE of everything Obama is doing.. Cutting taxes, decreasing regulations etc.
No - Reagan won popularity by boosting the economy - and he did this through cutting taxes and increasing government spending - same thing Obama has done (in Reagan's case it was largely due to the increased military spending of his arms build up).
Your way of thinking is not patient either. Its actually what would be described as "selfish". Very much like Pelosi, Nelson, Reid, Boxer, Biden, Etc.. All folks who consider themselves reasonable and patient.
I've only read 2 of his posts and I picked up on that.
No - Reagan won popularity by boosting the economy - and he did this through cutting taxes and increasing government spending - same thing Obama has done (in Reagan's case it was largely due to the increased military spending of his arms build up).
Ken
You post is based on facts, not rhetoric.
Easy facts to research for anyone that wants to know the truth.
No - Reagan won popularity by boosting the economy - and he did this through cutting taxes and increasing government spending - same thing Obama has done (in Reagan's case it was largely due to the increased military spending of his arms build up).
Ken
During the 1980s Reagan enacted Mundell’s three-legged approach. He slashed tax rates on the supply-side and was not afraid to run budget deficits in the Keynesian mold.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
True... same things that Obama's done...
