Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:43 PM
 
1,770 posts, read 2,897,517 times
Reputation: 1174

Advertisements

What do you think we need?
I have this theory based entirely off of nothing that if we increased the minimum wage to something that IS livable, that we may have less poverty. Less welfare cases. Etc.

I understand everyone's life is different. What one may think is a good wage, someone may think it's crap.

The min wage I believe in NJ is like $7.75. Let's say they slightly doubled it to $15. $15 an hour, IMO, is something that is livable. Especially in a dual income home. There would be no need for welfare, there would be enough for these people to pay their rent (or mortgage), pay their bills, and even have money left over to buy stuff. Buying stuff is a good thing. It stimulates the economy.

If more people have disposable money, then more people will be out there spending money. This way, the companies that DO pay the crappy min wage now..would eventually make up for now doubling the salaries of their workers.

I mean, it makes sense to me. But what about someone else?
Or is this a system to make people feel better about themselves compared to other people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:50 PM
 
1,842 posts, read 1,708,271 times
Reputation: 169
Well your theory isn't that new. The minimum wage back in 1968 was about 1/2 of the average wage back then or about what you are suggesting adjusted for inflation. The trickle up theory. Not a bad one and it does work.

We need to insist that our trading partners pay their workers better so that we can export our goods to them as well as import goods from them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
So you've only discussed one side of this equation. How's about the business owner ?
How does he manage double the hourly rate and still survive ?
Talk about the full idea for both employer and employee. One sided does not give a complete solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,507,748 times
Reputation: 1450
This will never work.

Anyway, why should someone make a "livable" wage. You make what is deserving of the job. Not what people think is "livable"

By your logic I should pay the neighbor kid $15 an hour to mow my yard? Nonsense.

It aint an employers job to pay someone a "livable" wage. It's an employers job to compensate the emplyee for services rendered. Whether the employee can live on that is not of concern to the employer.

By your logic we could also just lower the price of all goods and services. I mean, I can't afford a new Mercedes but I need it to make my life more "livable." Should we lower the price of all Mercedes to $10,000? How many Mercedes would get made?

Your plan of requiring $15 hour for people would probably lead to 60 percent unemployment. Maybe more.

The average employer $5 per hour per employee abiding with government regualtion and taxes. That means that almost everyone in this country is already making $15 an hour. It's just their rightful compensation is going to the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,507,748 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0tmess View Post
What do you think we need?
I have this theory based entirely off of nothing that if we increased the minimum wage to something that IS livable, that we may have less poverty. Less welfare cases. Etc.

I understand everyone's life is different. What one may think is a good wage, someone may think it's crap.

The min wage I believe in NJ is like $7.75. Let's say they slightly doubled it to $15. $15 an hour, IMO, is something that is livable. Especially in a dual income home. There would be no need for welfare, there would be enough for these people to pay their rent (or mortgage), pay their bills, and even have money left over to buy stuff. Buying stuff is a good thing. It stimulates the economy.

If more people have disposable money, then more people will be out there spending money. This way, the companies that DO pay the crappy min wage now..would eventually make up for now doubling the salaries of their workers.

I mean, it makes sense to me. But what about someone else?
Or is this a system to make people feel better about themselves compared to other people?
Let's say you go to the local Applebees for dinner, order $25-30 worth of food, and you're there for an hour, which isn't unreasonable amount of time.

Do you leave a $15 tip? And why not? Doesn't the person at Applebee's need a "livable" wage? Or do you give them what you think the job deserved?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
min wage jobs are mostly entry level or go nowhere service jobs. When people make those jobs their careers then you have troubles. You cannot raise a family being a McDonald's cashier..sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
I honestly don't think there should be a minimum wage. If a company isn't paying you enough money to do your job, then get another one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 04:59 PM
 
3,261 posts, read 5,305,051 times
Reputation: 3986
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0tmess View Post
What do you think we need?
I have this theory based entirely off of nothing that if we increased the minimum wage to something that IS livable, that we may have less poverty. Less welfare cases. Etc.

I understand everyone's life is different. What one may think is a good wage, someone may think it's crap.

The min wage I believe in NJ is like $7.75. Let's say they slightly doubled it to $15. $15 an hour, IMO, is something that is livable. Especially in a dual income home. There would be no need for welfare, there would be enough for these people to pay their rent (or mortgage), pay their bills, and even have money left over to buy stuff. Buying stuff is a good thing. It stimulates the economy.

If more people have disposable money, then more people will be out there spending money. This way, the companies that DO pay the crappy min wage now..would eventually make up for now doubling the salaries of their workers.

I mean, it makes sense to me. But what about someone else?
Or is this a system to make people feel better about themselves compared to other people?
Bad idea and it will have IMO the opposite results.

Wage is a cost to the manufacturer / distributer / smalll business owner - so when you force a wage increase they will raise the prices of the products and services they sell ---> So that "new higher" wage is no longer livable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 05:01 PM
 
1,770 posts, read 2,897,517 times
Reputation: 1174
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
This will never work.

Anyway, why should someone make a "livable" wage. You make what is deserving of the job. Not what people think is "livable"

By your logic I should pay the neighbor kid $15 an hour to mow my yard? Nonsense.

It aint an employers job to pay someone a "livable" wage. It's an employers job to compensate the emplyee for services rendered. Whether the employee can live on that is not of concern to the employer.

By your logic we could also just lower the price of all goods and services. I mean, I can't afford a new Mercedes but I need it to make my life more "livable." Should we lower the price of all Mercedes to $10,000? How many Mercedes would get made?

Your plan of requiring $15 hour for people would probably lead to 60 percent unemployment. Maybe more.

The average employer $5 per hour per employee abiding with government regualtion and taxes. That means that almost everyone in this country is already making $15 an hour. It's just their rightful compensation is going to the government.
Hmm.
First of all, you don't hire the neighbor kid to mow your lawn so minimum wage does not apply to this. Anything "under the table" does not apply.

What's wrong with wanting to have people earning a livable wage? $15 was a ballpark number, not like something I proposed. If more people made more money, there would be more money out there being spent! This is how an employer could make up for that.

No, why would anyone propose anything like dropping the price of a Mercedes? Lowering prices on anything has nothing to do with it at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0tmess View Post
Hmm.
First of all, you don't hire the neighbor kid to mow your lawn so minimum wage does not apply to this. Anything "under the table" does not apply.

What's wrong with wanting to have people earning a livable wage? $15 was a ballpark number, not like something I proposed. If more people made more money, there would be more money out there being spent! This is how an employer could make up for that.

No, why would anyone propose anything like dropping the price of a Mercedes? Lowering prices on anything has nothing to do with it at all.
That's not quite how business works. Paying that $15/hour may put the business operating at a loss for each item. The more you sell the greater the loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top