Sarah Palin risks "Death Panels" for her own grandson! (interview, how much)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes. The father of the child is of native American heritage. Some Alaskian tribe but I cannot remember the name off-hand. Yup'ik ancestry. I guess they are not exactly considered American indian but native Alaskian tribes.
Last edited by dcsldcd; 02-21-2010 at 08:52 AM..
Reason: additional info.
The point is not whether or not Bristol can afford to bring her child to a private doctor or if she is legally entitled to get socialized care for him. The point is that Sarah Palin speaks of "death panels" and if she truly believed in the inadequacies of socialized programs, why wouldn't she insist that her grandson be taken to a facility that she can well afford to pay for? You must see the hypocrisy.
Well by your protestations I would have to assume you think all native indians are nothing but a bunch of worthless losers because they accept the programs they are entitled to by the wrongs of yesterday. Nice
Be careful when you A*S*S*ume. The above is just spin.
The dangers of "death panels" were explained to Americans on Sarah Palin's Facebook page. Oh, sweet Lord, she must not sleep at night...her grandson could be the next victim of "socialized medicine".
Recently released documents from the custody battle show clearly Tripp Palin Johnston has socialized health care through Indian Health Services and the Alaska Native Medical Center.
Palin's family has federally funded health care afforded to them...but if you had it Barack Obama might kill you. Put this on the list of Palin's Greatest Hypocritical Hits...volume 97.
And hasn't Palin made millions of dollars this year? Why is she taking public assistance for her family? Why should the public be paying for the health care of a millionaire's grandson?
One more brick in the wall of self-serving hypocrisy that Palin continues to build around herself...
The point is not whether or not Bristol can afford to bring her child to a private doctor or if she is legally entitled to get socialized care for him. The point is that Sarah Palin speaks of "death panels" and if she truly believed in the inadequacies of socialized programs, why wouldn't she insist that her grandson be taken to a facility that she can well afford to pay for? You must see the hypocrisy.
Only the father of the baby and the baby would be legally entitled to any indian programs. What I see and the only real facts anyone has is Sarah Palin is not the parent and cannot insist anything. Where is the hypocrisy?
I live where there are many indians and some very wealthy indians they cntinue to accept the programs they are entitled to. It;s a personal preferance and none of our business. We all know this thread has nothing to do with this baby but is nothing more than another very lame attempt to attack Sarah Palin. It's the usual display of Palin Derangement Syndrome.
Only the father of the baby and the baby would be legally entitled to any indian programs. What I see and the only real facts anyone has is Sarah Palin is not the parent and cannot insist anything. Where is the hypocrisy?
I live where there are many indians and some very wealthy indians they cntinue to accept the programs they are entitled to. It;s a personal preferance and none of our business. We all know this thread has nothing to do with this baby but is nothing more than another very lame attempt to attack Sarah Palin. It's the usual display of Palin Derangement Syndrome.
You continue to miss the point. Palin railed against gov't controlled health care, yet she allows her precious grandson's health decisions to be determined the same gov't health care that she demonized, over and over again.
Do you really think that Palin is not "insisting" on everything that goes on in Bristol's life?? You can almost see the strings attached to the girls arms...
You continue to miss the point. Palin railed against gov't controlled health care, yet she allows her precious grandson's health decisions to be determined the same gov't health care that she demonized, over and over again.
Do you really think that Palin is not "insisting" on everything that goes on in Bristol's life?? You can almost see the strings attached to the girls arms...
No YOU miss the point. Palin is NOT in the position to allow anything. SHE is NOT the parent and since YOU nor anyone else lives with any of the Palins, what you know is pure imagination driven by hatred.
Only the father of the baby and the baby would be legally entitled to any indian programs. What I see and the only real facts anyone has is Sarah Palin is not the parent and cannot insist anything. Where is the hypocrisy?
I live where there are many indians and some very wealthy indians they cntinue to accept the programs they are entitled to. It;s a personal preferance and none of our business. We all know this thread has nothing to do with this baby but is nothing more than another very lame attempt to attack Sarah Palin. It's the usual display of Palin Derangement Syndrome.
It's not a lame attempt. Here's this woman who speaks out against socialized healthcare, how horrible and awful it is, yet wouldn't be smart enough to tell her daughter..."Y'know Bristol, if you enroll Trip, Trig (or whatever the hell his name is) in this program, it's going to make me look really bad". I mean you cannot speak out against something like this and then have your own family enrolled in it. I do not have "Palin Derangement Syndrome", (you know that the fact you titled that is just too creepy), but I do see the overt hypocrisy.
No YOU miss the point. Palin is NOT in the position to allow anything. SHE is NOT the parent and since YOU nor anyone else lives with any of the Palins, what you know is pure imagination driven by hatred.
Well, you ARE the expert on pure imagination being driven by hatred....
It's not a lame attempt. Here's this woman who speaks out against socialized healthcare, how horrible and awful it is, yet wouldn't be smart enough to tell her daughter..."Y'know Bristol, if you enroll Trip, Trig (or whatever the hell his name is) in this program, it's going to make me look really bad". I mean you cannot speak out against something like this and then have your own family enrolled in it. I do not have "Palin Derangement Syndrome", (you know that the fact you titled that is just too creepy), but I do see the overt hypocrisy.
How do you know what she did or didn't tell he daughter?!!!!! Is everyone on the left seers or something? What a feat to be able to be all knowing when you have no personal contact to know a d*mn real fact!
Insanity. Pure insanity driven by hatred.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
