Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So why is a "THE" Militia a bad thing? Oath keepers included in this question. Our country was founded by, backed by and owes it freedom to them. No I don't mean the super right wing that the media reports "ONLY" on.
Need prood that a Gov. agency can violate any law they so choose. Look at what the state and local Gov. did in New Orleans [sp?] House to house, block by block with out any legale warrents there LEO agents , by force of arms searched for and took any and all legal firearms they saw.
And you call that American justice.
Free Men have Firearms
Slaves do not
Because the far left wants a government controlling all aspects of life, and an armed population, can resist such tyranny. Look at the UK, etc., to see what they want to do here...
Because we were fighting for independence as a nation. These people do this just because they disagree with the president. Very cowardly and unpatriotic IMO.
Several things Obama has supported over the years, run counter to our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty. Things that make what the founders fought over look tiny in comparison.
Total Crap, most Police agencies won't hire anyone who ties themselves to Oafkeepers. Any good Police Officer knows he will lose his job the minute he starts deciding which laws he will enforce. Likewise with the Military, are Commanders supposed to negotiate with their men over which orders they will follow. I am a retired Police Supervisor and am also retired from the Army, anone who is dumb enough to follow these radicals will soon be on the outside looking in
Several things Obama has supported over the years, run counter to our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty. Things that make what the founders fought over look tiny in comparison.
In the past, he has argued for a total handgun ban, total ban on semi-auto firearms, registration, ban of concealed carry nationally, then there's his ideas for cap and trade, ideas to sign us onto more UN treaties that take away some of our sovereignty (he did give INTERPOL the right to operate in the US), his ties to ACORN and various marxists is rather disturbing, he suggested in the past the Constitution is flawed because it doesn't allow for the sort of socialism he supports, and there's others but these will suffice.
In the past, he has argued for a total handgun ban, total ban on semi-auto firearms, registration, ban of concealed carry nationally, then there's his ideas for cap and trade, ideas to sign us onto more UN treaties that take away some of our sovereignty (he did give INTERPOL the right to operate in the US), his ties to ACORN and various marxists is rather disturbing, he suggested in the past the Constitution is flawed because it doesn't allow for the sort of socialism he supports, and there's others but these will suffice.
People on all sides have argued for handgun bans. Though I'm a liberal I'm for the 2nd ammendment, but this argument is nothing new. And how exactly is cap & trade and UN treaty signings unconstitutional?
In the past, he has argued for a total handgun ban, total ban on semi-auto firearms, registration, ban of concealed carry nationally, then there's his ideas for cap and trade, ideas to sign us onto more UN treaties that take away some of our sovereignty (he did give INTERPOL the right to operate in the US), his ties to ACORN and various marxists is rather disturbing, he suggested in the past the Constitution is flawed because it doesn't allow for the sort of socialism he supports, and there's others but these will suffice.
Not to speak of his comments ' clinging to our guns and religian ' of course he wasn't talking about the muslims when he said it . [ Not all muslims, just the ones who radicals or take the quran literily. ]
People on all sides have argued for handgun bans. Though I'm a liberal I'm for the 2nd ammendment, but this argument is nothing new. And how exactly is cap & trade and UN treaty signings unconstitutional?
They require 2/3 vote in the congress and cannot be signed by a president directly. Also, they can only apply to trade and armistices, not for enforcing international law. The UN has no jurisdiction to enact laws in America.
People on all sides have argued for handgun bans. Though I'm a liberal I'm for the 2nd ammendment, but this argument is nothing new. And how exactly is cap & trade and UN treaty signings unconstitutional?
It's not just Obama, this started long before he was causing race divisions in Chicago . Bush ws just as bad but knew he didn't have the clout to back up his agenda, because he couldn't use the race card .
We have many blacks waking up to the hustlers butthey are called ' Uncle Toms '.
It is a shame Allen keys or Tom Tancredo didn't even get a chance to speak in the election .
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
