Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,306,667 times
Reputation: 1176

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
ny belief is that no politician except the potus needs any type of secret service protection, and that the potus should also have to carry a firearm to help protect himself.
I agree.
The savings to America would tremendous and politicians would be less prone to engage in criminal activities. The womb of security details also adds to their entitlement mentality.
Let em hire their own security if they feel the need.


Anyway, always glad to see a parasitic lawyer (Hillary) getting sued.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:42 AM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,521,526 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by allydriver View Post
I agree.
The savings to America would tremendous and politicians would be less prone to engage in criminal activities. The womb of security details also adds to their entitlement mentality.
Let em hire their own security if they feel the need.


Anyway, always glad to see a parasitic lawyer (Hillary) getting sued.

Where was this arguement during any of the elections? The 2008 election bought out all of the crazies or did you forget? I'm not just talking about Crazies against the Democratic Candidates, but also the Republican Candidates. S
hould they hire their own security? Maybe but the past election was not your typical election you had a Bi-racial candidate and two women, that alone was just a mixture for the uglies to come out.

And by the way, Government official will have police protection, should they pay for their own security team as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:49 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,281,516 times
Reputation: 7364
Unfortunately, police die in the line of duty all the time. How is it Hillary's fault that this man had an accident? Either the family is letting their grief cloud their judgment so they can't get closure, or they have dollar signs in their eyes, planted there by some ambulance chaser lawyer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching
ny belief is that no politician except the potus needs any type of secret service protection, and that the potus should also have to carry a firearm to help protect himself.
That's just naive and shortsighted to say that. Without Secret Service protection, you'd be making high ranking officials and their families sitting ducks to be kidnapped and/or killed by terrorists. We'd never have a stable government again. We don't need that kind of drama here in America.

Last edited by Wayland Woman; 02-24-2010 at 10:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:56 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,158,597 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
There are a lot of kooks out there who want to kill a politician for fame and glory. The SS wouldn't provide the protection unless it was necessary.


doesnt matter, not the publics problem. if a politician is so worried about their safety, then let them handle and hire their own security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,316 posts, read 120,386,609 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
doesnt matter, not the publics problem. if a politician is so worried about their safety, then let them handle and hire their own security.
See post #13. It is the publics (sic) problem to protect people who want to run for elective office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:59 AM
 
Location: just here
1,773 posts, read 1,262,041 times
Reputation: 438
You guys are so full of it, if this was one of your beloved republican, conservative what have you high-ranking politicians you'd be crying foul about this right now & the thought of them providing their own security would never be crossing your mind. Why are some people on here so obviously biased just to be jacka*ses? You're not even logical & you sound totally delusional.

This family is clearly blinded by grief & not thinking straight. There's no reason to sue a politician for an accident that was clearly not their fault. Sane & rational people understand this, others do not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 10:03 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,158,597 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Unfortunately, police die in the line of duty all the time. How is it Hillary's fault that this man had an accident? Either the family is letting their grief cloud their judgment so they can't get closure, or they have dollar signs in their eyes, planned there by some ambulance chaser lawyer.

That's just naive and shortsighted to say that. Without Secret Service protection, you'd be making high ranking officials and their families sitting ducks to be kidnapped and/or killed by terrorists. We'd never have a stable government again. We don't need that kind of drama here in America.

drama? we already have drama in washington dc, each and everytime politicians violate our rights.

I am still in the belief that if politicians want protection, then let them supply it for themselves.

potus should be the only one getting secret service protection.

former potus that have been out of office less than 4 years should also get it, but anything more than 4 years is their cost and not with the secret service.

this also applies to the veeps as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 10:05 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,158,597 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by wedjat View Post
You guys are so full of it, if this was one of your beloved republican, conservative what have you high-ranking politicians you'd be crying foul about this right now & the thought of them providing their own security would never be crossing your mind. Why are some people on here so obviously biased just to be jacka*ses? You're not even logical & you sound totally delusional.

I dont care if the politician in question is a democrat, republican, foriegn head of state or any other politician, if they are not the potus or vice potus or left the office of potus in the last 4 years, then they can provide protection for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 10:08 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,158,597 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
See post #13. It is the publics (sic) problem to protect people who want to run for elective office.

I know it is the publics problem to protect our politician scum, but it doesnt mean it is right.

as far as the line "terrorism" goes, if they dont like it, then get out of the fire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 10:10 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 36,953,982 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
local cops usually team up with secret service to provide protection to politicians. but my belief still stands on the use of secret service for a protection detail on politicians.
Former First Ladies like former Presidents are afforded Secret Service protection for life and if history is our guide, it is more than justified.

Also, let me point out that presidential motorcades are rather large as they contain not only the candidates, the traveling press but local and state officials as well, so, just like long funeral corteges, they require special assistance from motorcycle patrols whose main responsibility is to provide the safe and efficient movement of a large number of cars through traffic.

The officers family has little standing with regards the Sec Clinton as a defendant, but it makes good press.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top