Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,574,845 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

This week two more Democratic White House hopefuls dropped out of the Sept. 23 Democratic debate to be co-hosted by Fox News Channel and the Congressional Black Caucus Political Education and Leadership Institute.

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Gov. Bill Richardson, D-NM, are the latest to boycott the event, to be held in Detroit, because of the perceived bias of Fox News Channel.

Says Dodd spokeswoman Christy Setzer: "Given the current lineup of candidates, we feel we cannot have a full debate on the real differences in this race that the American people deserve."
Former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, was the first to announce he wouldn't attend. Edwards deputy campaign manager Jonathan Prince proclaimed that "there's just no reason for Democrats to give Fox a platform to advance the right-wing agenda while pretending they're objective."

Political Punch
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:10 PM
 
9,888 posts, read 10,818,311 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
This week two more Democratic White House hopefuls dropped out of the Sept. 23 Democratic debate to be co-hosted by Fox News Channel and the Congressional Black Caucus Political Education and Leadership Institute.

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Gov. Bill Richardson, D-NM, are the latest to boycott the event, to be held in Detroit, because of the perceived bias of Fox News Channel.

Says Dodd spokeswoman Christy Setzer: "Given the current lineup of candidates, we feel we cannot have a full debate on the real differences in this race that the American people deserve."
Former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, was the first to announce he wouldn't attend. Edwards deputy campaign manager Jonathan Prince proclaimed that "there's just no reason for Democrats to give Fox a platform to advance the right-wing agenda while pretending they're objective."

Political Punch
What a joke this is, how are any of these yahoos gonna handle a hostile foreign country if they are afraid of big bad fox news,??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Northern MN
592 posts, read 2,809,195 times
Reputation: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
T

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Gov. Bill Richardson, D-NM, are the latest to boycott the event, to be held in Detroit, because of the perceived bias of Fox News Channel.

Says Dodd spokeswoman Christy Setzer: "Given the current lineup of candidates, we feel we cannot have a full debate on the real differences in this race that the American people deserve."
Former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, was the first to announce he wouldn't attend. Edwards deputy campaign manager Jonathan Prince proclaimed that "there's just no reason for Democrats to give Fox a platform to advance the right-wing agenda while pretending they're objective."

Political Punch
I don't see it as them boycotting Fox news, rather boycotting a media event which they do not control. If there was a chance they could play a part in the questions asked or the context of the questions, they'd bite in a nanosecond. What a shame there is such fear of truth and responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:12 PM
 
1,135 posts, read 3,981,104 times
Reputation: 673
I think so...

I think going on FOX cheapens your cause.
You would lose a certain amount of credibility dignifying
what has been proven to have an agenda.
Its would be like going on Springer to argue your parental rights
or something like that. It just lessens any seriousness or urgency
of the stuff that needs to be discussed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,208,139 times
Reputation: 7373
Based upon Fox's clear historical bias I have no problem with the Dems staying away.

The avoidance has no relationship to handling a hostile foreign country, that is just plain silly.

Last edited by NewToCA; 06-02-2007 at 04:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:53 PM
 
1,135 posts, read 3,981,104 times
Reputation: 673
wUt y0u SeD, NewtoCA,

From my viewpoint, the charlatans who peddle thier
wares on FOX are the ones who are having problems
handling hostile foriegn and domestic countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 04:56 PM
 
2,433 posts, read 6,676,051 times
Reputation: 1065
They can get away with this for now, sense this is just the primary. But this is actually a huge mistake on the part of democrats. The Factor, for example, is the nations leading cable news program and they have a huge audience that includes many, many moderates. And no one will win the 2008 presidential election without the support of the moderates. Everyone knows democrats watch CNN in huge numbers, and republicans watch Fox in the same way. But the moderates watch both hoping to get information from both sides of the political spectrum. The democrats that choose not to go on Fox are actually choosing not to get their message out to millions and millions of potential supporters. Many of them moderate republicans who are just about fed up with the way things are going in Washington right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,208,139 times
Reputation: 7373
There are sufficient outlets to get out messages without using Fox. If anything noteworthy is said by any candidate about any subject, Fox will need to broadcast it too. I'm not concerned with moderates needing to be influenced by Fox, I don't see this as critical to the election. When candidates are selected, the process will include Fox only as part of a larger distribution network. Fox can air what it chooses, but hurts their own credibility further if obviously selective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Northern MN
592 posts, read 2,809,195 times
Reputation: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkeye48 View Post
They can get away with this for now, sense this is just the primary. But this is actually a huge mistake on the part of democrats. The Factor, for example, is the nations leading cable news program and they have a huge audience that includes many, many moderates. And no one will win the 2008 presidential election without the support of the moderates. Everyone knows democrats watch CNN in huge numbers, and republicans watch Fox in the same way. But the moderates watch both hoping to get information from both sides of the political spectrum. The democrats that choose not to go on Fox are actually choosing not to get their message out to millions and millions of potential supporters. Many of them moderate republicans who are just about fed up with the way things are going in Washington right now.
Shhhhhhhhhhh....don't tell them the secret for the GOP to win again You know its another Bush conspiracy, right after he ropes the moon and sells all his oil, he's gonna sell Fox to the Dems so they can control another network..come on Hawk, you promised you wouldn't tell.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2007, 08:31 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,464,947 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
What a joke this is, how are any of these yahoos gonna handle a hostile foreign country if they are afraid of big bad fox news,??
It isn't fear, but an unwillingness to dignify the network by appearing on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top