Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2010, 09:15 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,593,793 times
Reputation: 1080

Advertisements

"Yes, the Health Care Bill Really Does Pay for Itself," repeats CBO

In the merry ol' land of oz...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2010, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,700,795 times
Reputation: 14818
How they got there:

How Health Care Costs and Goals Came Out Right for Obama - NYTimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
If it paid for itself then why are we paying MORE ?
Nothing in the government pays for itself because the government doesn't generate money..it takes OUR money.

The government cannot create jobs (except within itself) and the government does not generate money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 10:43 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,682,324 times
Reputation: 1962
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
The CBO has a new score of the final Senate healthcare bill, with all its amendments included, and it hasn't changed much. Over the next decade they estimate that it would lower the federal deficit by $118 billion.

But isn't this just smoke and mirrors because the bill raises taxes for ten years but only spends money for six? Nope. It also reduces the federal deficit in the full decade after 2019.
Yes, the Healthcare Bill Really Does Pay for Itself | Mother Jones

The March 11, 2010 CBO report, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc...ter_HR3590.pdf:
CBO expects that the proposal would generate a reduction in the federal budgetary commitment to health care during the decade following 2019; that judgment is unchanged from CBO’s previous assessment.
At the expense of WHOM!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
...

Last edited by sanrene; 03-19-2010 at 12:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
washingtonpost.com

More confirmation that the numbers from the CBO are based on "assumptions" and "promises".

Quote:
The CBO is required to assume that Congress will do what it promises. So, for example, Congress promises in the measure to cut several hundred billion dollars in Medicare spending. Sometimes such promises have come to pass. Other times, as in the current difficulty with scheduled cuts in Medicare reimbursements for doctors, they are put off because of a public -- or politically connected -- outcry.
How likely is it the Cadillac tax will be implemented in 7 years? How likely the reimbursement rate for doctors and hospitals will be cut?

Willful ignorance to deny these facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 06:01 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 10,412,481 times
Reputation: 2881
The CBO assumes that based on cuts proposed to the Medicare program. We all know that will not happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 06:54 PM
 
1,062 posts, read 1,018,732 times
Reputation: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
washingtonpost.com

More confirmation that the numbers from the CBO are based on "assumptions" and "promises".



How likely is it the Cadillac tax will be implemented in 7 years? How likely the reimbursement rate for doctors and hospitals will be cut?

Willful ignorance to deny these facts.
Exactly. Medicare cuts? If they don't happen (likely), the CBO numbers are wrong. If they do happen (very unlikely), plan on seeing a whole lot of "No Medicare patients accepted" signs.

So to those who support this plan, which do you prefer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,240,443 times
Reputation: 6243
Default Assumptions

Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
The CBO has a new score of the final Senate healthcare bill, with all its amendments included, and it hasn't changed much. Over the next decade they estimate that it would lower the federal deficit by $118 billion.[/i]
First, they are loading up on new taxes to the tune of over $1 trillion. Great for the economy. But the real rub is that they are assuming that they will actually get to tax all "cadillac" health plans (those that are more expensive than average, for a variety of reasons) at 40%, and there will be absolutely no reduction in the number of those plans. Anyone who thinks businesses will continue to offer plans that get taxed at 40% deserves the title "Democrat".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2010, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
The CBO has a new score of the final Senate healthcare bill, with all its amendments included, and it hasn't changed much. Over the next decade they estimate that it would lower the federal deficit by $118 billion.

But isn't this just smoke and mirrors because the bill raises taxes for ten years but only spends money for six? Nope. It also reduces the federal deficit in the full decade after 2019.
Yes, the Healthcare Bill Really Does Pay for Itself | Mother Jones

The March 11, 2010 CBO report, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc...ter_HR3590.pdf:
CBO expects that the proposal would generate a reduction in the federal budgetary commitment to health care during the decade following 2019; that judgment is unchanged from CBO’s previous assessment.
Or maybe not...


Medicare fix would push health care into the red - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Medicare-fix-would-push-apf-2700343586.html?x=0&.v=2 - broken link)

I am sure in light of this new information you will change your mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top