Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He rammed the guy in the rear, the bumper sticker is in the rear, so you assume he was specifically targeting the bumper sticker. I'm not defending the idiot's actions at all. I'm questioning the reason for the road rage because no where in the article does it give any quote from the police or the attacker. The victim driver is assuming the bumper sticker is the reason for the rage. Of course, it couldn't possibly be something he may have done while distrated from having kids in the vehicle. It may well be the Obama sticker but until the article quotes the rager or the police,...I'll hold off on blaming a bumper sticker.
The vehicle was not exactly rammed...the alleged victim stated he saw the driver speed toward his vehicle and he slammed on his brakes, forcing the vehicle to hit the rear of his car.
This driver had his 12 year old daughter in the car and slams on his brakes. The driver wanted the vehicle to hit him, his actions put his daughter in danger.
The vehicle was not exactly rammed...the alleged victim stated he saw the driver speed toward his vehicle and he slammed on his brakes, forcing the vehicle to hit the rear of his car.
This driver had his 12 year old daughter in the car and slams on his brakes. The driver wanted the vehicle to hit him, his actions put his daughter in danger.
You are supposed to have complete control of your vehicle at ALL times, period!!! He did not. Crash in Point!
Change in 2012!!! Change we really can believe in then!!!
The vehicle was not exactly rammed...the alleged victim stated he saw the driver speed toward his vehicle and he slammed on his brakes, forcing the vehicle to hit the rear of his car.
This driver had his 12 year old daughter in the car and slams on his brakes. The driver wanted the vehicle to hit him, his actions put his daughter in danger.
Wow I read the story but my reading comprehension must really suck.
You see when I read it I thought his daughter was 10 not 12. I thought the perp drove up behind him and bumped his car before he applied the brakes.
Then again I'm not trying to protect some wacko that tried to kill a 10 year old girl. Maybe I read it right.
Or maybe the victim forgot to signal before crossing into the rager's path thus cutting him off. All the article has is the victim's opinion on what caused the rager. Nothing from the police or the rager.
The ironic thing is that this happened on a public road or in Republican vernacular, a socialistic road.
Why are cons using products of socialism?
Providing roads for transportation, providing police, military, and fire fighting for defense, and maintaining water ways as part of transportation are all part of a government's job,...it's not a socialistic road.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Road rage, accident centers on Obama bumper sticker
