U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-26-2010, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,091 posts, read 27,131,281 times
Reputation: 8053

Advertisements

CNSNews.com - Obama Transportation Secretary: ‘This Is the End of Favoring Motorized Transportation at the Expense of Non-Motorized’ (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/63290 - broken link)
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has announced that federal transportation policies will no longer favor “motorized” transportation, such as cars and trucks, over “non-motorized” transportation, such as walking and bicycling.
“Some in the highway-supporters motorist groups have been concerned by your livability initiative,” said the moderator at the National Press Club event. “Is this an effort to make driving more torturous and to coerce people out of their cars?”

“It is a way to coerce people out of their cars,” said LaHood.

The moderator later asked: “Some conservative groups are wary of the livable communities program, saying it's an example of government intrusion into people's lives. How do you respond?”

“About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people's lives,” said LaHood. “So have at it.”
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2010, 07:21 PM
 
404 posts, read 1,465,544 times
Reputation: 219
people will always drive cars. this promotes walking and bicycling. two things our fat ass country could use more of. and its good for the bike and walking shoe business


/positive spin
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 08:02 PM
 
1,329 posts, read 3,396,756 times
Reputation: 986
What we need is a bureau of bovine and equine transportation, together with a bureau of bovine and equine scatology to deal with the by-products of non-motorized transportation.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 08:14 PM
 
404 posts, read 1,465,544 times
Reputation: 219
ideas flowing freely itt
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,091 posts, read 27,131,281 times
Reputation: 8053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhang Fei View Post
What we need is a bureau of bovine and equine transportation, together with a bureau of bovine and equine scatology to deal with the by-products of non-motorized transportation.
No, that won't work. PeTA doesn't like having animals used as beast of burden or being abused (their definition of abuse seems to get lower and lower). They'd prefer we ride bicycles made with recycled metal and recycled rubber. They'd also prefer we oil our bicycle chain with vegetable oil. No leather seats nor any leather on the handle bars. No plastic either unless it's made with biodegradable material. No rubber insulation in the handbrake or gear shift cables. In fact, no gears and no hand brakes. Just one gear and peddle brakes. No plastic reflectors. Use recycled metal for reflectors and a plastic like material made from corn byproducts. No paint on the bicycle. Too much toxic material in bicycle paint. Let mother nature recover her metal naturally through rust.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 10:07 PM
 
48,504 posts, read 93,391,344 times
Reputation: 18271
Well I can just see the persidentail bicycle now. Obama should satrt with himself;hillary and other riding bicycles.Start in Washington governmentfirst and then come see me in ten years if your still here is what I say.I still don't see investing money in chrysler and GM and favoring this policy;kind of stupid.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 10:16 PM
 
11,518 posts, read 50,718,628 times
Reputation: 16136
I'm waiting to see the "wheels of commerce" function with all the goods needed for society transported by coerced bicycle transport.

Of course, the power elite in D.C. won't be subject to these regulations, any more than they've exempted themselves from the regs in their latest work of legislation.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,091 posts, read 27,131,281 times
Reputation: 8053
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Well I can just see the persidentail bicycle now. Obama should satrt with himself;hillary and other riding bicycles.Start in Washington governmentfirst and then come see me in ten years if your still here is what I say.I still don't see investing money in chrysler and GM and favoring this policy;kind of stupid.
So would that be a Huffy or a Schwinn?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2010, 10:18 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,091 posts, read 27,131,281 times
Reputation: 8053
Remember those triangle orange flags mounted on bicycles to help drivers see that there's a bicycle coming out from between parked cars? For Obama, it would be an American flag on the pole and his secret service agents jogging along side in their dark suits. Hillary would be riding wearing one of her pants suits.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2010, 03:07 AM
 
Location: Eastern Missouri
3,046 posts, read 6,002,501 times
Reputation: 1392
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailordave View Post
CNSNews.com - Obama Transportation Secretary: ‘This Is the End of Favoring Motorized Transportation at the Expense of Non-Motorized’ (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/63290 - broken link)
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has announced that federal transportation policies will no longer favor “motorized” transportation, such as cars and trucks, over “non-motorized” transportation, such as walking and bicycling.
“Some in the highway-supporters motorist groups have been concerned by your livability initiative,” said the moderator at the National Press Club event. “Is this an effort to make driving more torturous and to coerce people out of their cars?”

“It is a way to coerce people out of their cars,” said LaHood.

The moderator later asked: “Some conservative groups are wary of the livable communities program, saying it's an example of government intrusion into people's lives. How do you respond?”

“About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people's lives,” said LaHood. “So have at it.”

well, there you have it. He actuly knows they are violating the Constitution and thinks it's no big deal. What a dirtbag
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top