Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not exactly. The Heller case allowed individuals to maintain certain types of handguns (mainly revolvers) in their residence as long it is either disassembled or locked away.
Long guns not owned prior to the 1970s and other firearms are still banned. At least for law abiding people.
Not exactly. The Heller case allowed individuals to maintain certain types of handguns (mainly revolvers) in their residence as long it is either disassembled or locked away.
Long guns not owned prior to the 1970s and other firearms are still banned. At least for law abiding people.
So non law abiding people are allowed to own long guns?
So non law abiding people are allowed to own long guns?
That's why they're considered non-law abiding.
One thing I should have mentioned about hand gun ownership in DC is that the prospective owner has to go through an extensive background check, fingerprinting and multi-hour training.
As old as I am the obtuseness of the anti-gun contingent never ceases to amaze me.
gun laws in dc are meaningless....the problem is virginia where basically if your crazy can still obtain a gun with limited id and cash....thats a 10 minute drive for these clowns....
Yes, AK's are banned in D.C. but they aren't banned in Virginia and the last I checked the distance between the two was less than the range of a .22. So your attempt to argue that gun control doesn't work is a bit specious.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.