Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know what this kind of thing is going to lead to right? The Federal Occupying Force is going to pass a "law" to prohibit discrimination against looters, thieves, and thugs.
Just because you are unaware of people not contributing to the benefit of collectivists does not mean that it doesn't occur. I personally avoid doing anything that would benefit known collectivists in any way whatsoever. I have no responsibility to help my enemy.
So you have no proof of the statements made, and in your fear or anger or something, you're making things up and saying "it could happen" - that's neither discussion nor rational.
It is not my problem if you choose not to read the new law. Look it up for yourself. It is there.
I notice you only challenge me and not the poster who states everything stays the same. Why is that? Blinded by your bias perhaps?
You made an assertion that you can't prove so you're trying to discredit the person who asked the question.
Very interesting.
It doesn't exist, that's why you can't find it.
Nice try though, no points.
I've seen it all now. I guess he's protected by the first amendment freedom of speech. I wonder how the medical board will handle this situation. His wife is a lawyer so I assume he consulted with her before posting this sign.
So you have no proof of the statements made, and in your fear or anger or something, you're making things up and saying "it could happen" - that's neither discussion nor rational.
Actually, I was addressing that there is indeed a deep hatred of looters, thugs, and thieves among those who prefer freedom rather than collectivism.
I've seen it all now. I guess he's protected by the first amendment freedom of speech. I wonder how the medical board will handle this situation. His wife is a lawyer so I assume he consulted with her before posting this sign.
"The outspoken Grayson described Cassell's sign as 'ridiculous.'
"'I'm disgusted,' he said. 'Maybe he thinks the Hippocratic Oath says, "Do no good." If this is the face of the right-wing in America, it's the face of cruelty…Why don't they change the name of the Republican Party to the Sore Loser Party.'"
If he happens to perform abortions he's already used to being on guard.
Urologists usually don't deal with FEMALE reproductive organs, lol.
Male yes, urinary yes, female no.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
